The Rabbinical Court Testimony

0:00 in people, that means that you have a virus that cannot be contained by vaccine, whereas

0:08 the population is mounting an increased pressure on the virus.

0:15 Why is this?

0:16 Well, because you're vaccinating literally large cohorts of the population, the immune

0:23 pressure will mount in the population, and normally that immune pressure will kill the

0:30 virus and eliminate the virus, but here it is not happening because these vaccines have

0:34 no sterilizing capacity, they cannot eliminate the virus.

0:38 So basically what is happening is that if you mass vaccinate a population with vaccines

0:47 that cannot contain the spread of the virus, what you are going to get is an enhanced propagation

0:55 in fact of more infectious variants.

0:58 So how does that happen?

1:00 Well, the vaccines of course do not cause the emergence of new mutants, mutants are all

1:08 of the place all the time, but because the population is mounting an immune pressure

1:15 on the virus, only the variants that are more infectious and that can overcome this immune

1:21 pressure will start to proliferate because they have a fitness advantage, they have a

1:26 competitive advantage towards the original strains that were less infectious.

1:33 Now if that happens in one person, that is not the problem, but if now this virus can

1:39 be transmitted to another person within exactly the same situation because he or she also

1:45 got vaccinated and is mounting immune pressure, then this virus increasingly gets a competitive

1:51 advantage in the population and that is how we see for example that since mass vaccination

1:57 started, we had a full minute propagation of more infectious strains.

2:02 Of course, the more infectious strains existed already before and they were circulating,

2:07 but never have we seen such a full minute propagation of the more infectious strains

2:12 since the mass vaccination-- >> Recording in progress.

2:16 >> Sorry, go, yeah, yeah, and load, oh sorry, like this, okay, you want to do, yeah, okay,

2:41 yeah, so yeah, no problem, so what does that mean?

2:48 Well, that means that the more you exert pressure as a population on the virus, the more the

2:55 virus is going to exploit its evolutionary capacity to basically overcome the pressure

3:04 that the population is putting on the virus and that will ultimately lead literally to

3:10 resistance of the virus to the vaccines and these are not my words since March of this

3:17 year 2021, molecular biologists, molecular epidemiologists, I should say, have been monitoring

3:26 the evolutionary progress of the virus and they have found that the virus is increasingly

3:35 developing mutations in the spike protein which is exactly the protein that the population

3:42 is exerting immune pressure upon and as everybody knows, the S protein is responsible for infectiousness.

3:52 So in other words, the virus continues to evolve mutations to become more and more infectious

4:00 or to provide a competitive advantage to more infectious variants.

4:06 Ultimately, and this is already going on, this has been clearly proven by the molecular epidemiologists,

4:14 ultimately there are going to be an increasing amount of mutations in the domain of the spike

4:22 protein that is responsible for recognizing, for being recognized by antibodies that can

4:30 neutralize the virus.

4:32 So first of all, if the virus can resist antibodies that prevent its infectivity, that means that

4:41 more infectious strains can get a competitive advantage.

4:45 If now on top of this, the virus is increasingly developing mutations that can escape from

4:52 the neutralizing antibodies, then we are really going to, or the virus is already evolving

4:59 towards a situation where it becomes literally resistant to the vaccines where these antibodies

5:04 can no longer neutralize the virus and that is of course a very dramatic situation.

5:12 Why?

5:13 You could say, well, the vaccine doesn't work anymore, that's it, no.

5:18 It's much worse than that because despite the fact that the antibodies of the vaccine

5:25 would no longer be capable of neutralizing the virus, they can still bind to the virus.

5:33 They can still bind to the virus and by binding to the virus, they can out-compete what we

5:39 call the innate antibodies.

5:41 The innate antibodies are the antibodies that especially youngsters and kids are provided

5:48 with and which naturally protect them from the disease and from infection.

5:55 Remember, COVID-19 is not a childhood disease.

6:01 So when the virus came into one strain originally, the vast majority of the healthy population

6:07 and certainly the children were protected, although they had never seen the virus before.

6:13 How can that be?

6:14 This can only be explained by the innate antibodies.

6:18 Now when you have spike-specific antibodies, for example, induced by the vaccine from these

6:26 antibodies, despite the fact that they can, for example, no longer neutralize, they strongly

6:32 bind to the virus and they prevent the innate antibodies from binding.

6:38 Because the innate antibodies can no longer bind to the virus, they can no longer eliminate

6:43 the virus because innate immunity provides sterilizing immunity.

6:49 When a kid gets infected with a virus, it will eliminate the virus and many of the children

6:55 will not even share the virus because this innate immunity is sterilizing.

7:02 Secondarily, it can recognize whatever variant.

7:05 It does not discriminate against any variant, no matter how infectious that variant is.

7:11 So we end up with a situation where first of all, and this is already evolving, that

7:18 we will have an increasing resistance of the virus to the vaccinal antibodies so that it

7:25 can no longer be neutralized, whereas these antibodies will be able to suppress the innate

7:35 antibodies that are normally responsible for protection, for example, in young children

7:40 or in children in general and in healthy people.

7:44 And because of that, we literally lose like every kind of protection, not just against

7:53 SARS-CoV-2, but in fact, all coronaviruses, because the innate antibodies, they can not

8:00 only recognize all kinds of SARS-CoV-2 variants, but even all kinds of different coronaviruses.

8:08 So the third problem is that nowadays, vaccines, they are sitting on antibodies, on vaccinal

8:17 antibodies that are pretty useless because they can no longer neutralize, but the fact

8:23 that they are still vaccinated will still promote the propagation of more infectious

8:30 variants, and that is exactly...

8:32 So in other words, they are an excellent breeding ground for the more infectious variants, which

8:38 is exactly, but exactly the opposite of what these vaccines were originally supposed to

8:44 do, mainly to induce herd immunity.

8:49 You can only have herd immunity provided you have a kind of immunity in the population

8:54 that is capable of reducing transmission in the population.

8:59 Now, this mass vaccination is having exactly the opposite effect.

9:04 It is increasing the infectivity rate.

9:06 And if you look at countries, for example, who have been very aggressively introducing

9:11 these mass vaccination campaigns, for example, like the UK, for example, like the US, for

9:15 example, like Israel, what you will see, and you can look at this curves in the world in

9:20 that.

9:21 It's very, very easy.

9:22 You simply look at the curves, phases, and you will see that the baseline of the infectivity

9:29 does no longer go down to the baseline, to the X-axis, so it never, ever joins the zero

9:37 axis again.

9:38 It stays way above the level that was reached about six months or one year ago.

9:45 So in other words, the average baseline on which the waves are dancing, of course, remains

9:51 very, very high.

9:52 This clearly illustrates that with enhanced mass vaccination, you increase infectious

9:59 pressure in the population.

10:01 And that is, of course, very, very detrimental and will do anything else but inducing herd

10:08 immunity.

10:09 So it's from a viewpoint, not just of individual health, that people would no longer be individual

10:14 protected, but also from public health, it goes completely, completely against the principle

10:20 of inducing herd immunity, which was, in fact, the overall objective of this mass vaccination

10:24 campaign.

10:25 So from a public health viewpoint, this is also a major, major issue.

10:29 I'll stop there and leave it over for questions.

10:41 Sorry, can people hear me?

10:51 Oh, sorry, I thought I lost you, I was so silent the whole time.

10:57 Specifically, what is your opinion on vaccinating children and the idea of forcing children

11:06 to vaccinate?

11:07 It was always optimal, but I understood that you were asking me what is my opinion about

11:22 vaccinating children and whether that would be potentially beneficial or rather harmful.

11:31 Well, my opinion of this is very clear, first of all, as I already told, COVID-19 is not

11:41 a child group disease.

11:42 I mean, same for, for example, influenza.

11:46 Would we ever vaccinate massively children against the flu?

11:50 No.

11:51 Why wouldn't we do that?

11:52 Because the flu, just like COVID-19, is a disease of vulnerable people.

11:57 You suppress people, elderly people, people with underlying diseases, comorbidities, etc.

12:02 is exactly the same situation for both diseases.

12:05 So that means that naturally speaking, the young people, and I'm literally speaking of

12:13 people below the age of 40, right?

12:16 So and certainly children, they are protected through natural antibodies.

12:22 And even though we have, we are now dealing with enhanced circulation on more infectious

12:29 variants like the Delta variant, we still see that the morbidity rate in children and

12:37 youngsters in general is very low, is very low.

12:41 And so, and the mortality rate is of course even much, much lower.

12:48 So that is one thing that children are still protected by their innate immunity.

12:54 They don't have really a problem.

12:57 But the second, the second issue is that, or the second advantage of not vaccinating

13:04 children is that this innate immunity constitutes, of the younger people, constitutes a huge reservoir

13:14 of viral clearance, of virus elimination in the population.

13:18 That's why I was saying innate immunity induces sterilizing immunity.

13:24 And the advantage is this innate immunity is not specific for any kind of variant.

13:34 It's very broad, and therefore, and that is very important, in contrast to vaccine induced

13:41 immunity, the innate immunity will not discriminate against any variant.

13:48 It will never ever promote, for example, or naturally select a more infectious variant.

13:56 It does the same job for all the variants.

13:59 It eliminates the variants, non-specific immunity is not discriminating.

14:07 And that is a huge, so no more infectious variants will have a competitive advantage.

14:12 So now what happens, what happens if we vaccinate the children?

14:16 Well, first of all, as I already mentioned, vaccinate antibodies, no matter whether they

14:24 work or not, even if they do work very well, they will out-compete the innate antibodies.

14:31 So that means that all of a sudden, by vaccinating children, we will replace this broadly protected,

14:40 sterilizing immunity that children and youngsters have by vaccinal antibodies, which we know

14:48 the efficacy of which is progressively declining.

14:53 And on top, since vaccinal antibodies have been primed, so that means they have a long

15:01 duration, they have a longevity of several months, they can almost permanently suppress

15:09 the innate antibodies.

15:10 So the innate antibodies are not competitive for binding to the spike protein compared

15:19 to the vaccinal antibodies.

15:20 But on top, as I was saying, vaccinal antibodies are antibodies that result from a total pruning

15:26 of the immune system.

15:27 Remember, you get two shots, your body must have seen the antigen very abundantly.

15:33 And that means that these innate antibodies will be suppressed over a longer time.

15:38 And even if your vaccinal antibodies decline, remember, we are dealing with a highly infectious

15:44 variant that is circulating.

15:47 So the infectious pressure is very high, which means that the likelihood that as a vaccinee

15:52 or any person in this population, the likelihood that you encounter again the virus will be

16:00 very, very high.

16:02 Each time this happens, your vaccinal antibodies will be boosted again, and you will again

16:07 severely suppress the innate antibodies.

16:10 So in other words, what is happening is that we are replacing a broadly protective immune

16:17 response that that tremendously contributes to herd immunity by an immune response that

16:25 has decreasing efficacy.

16:28 And when, for example, the resistance falls, there is nothing left because these antibodies

16:33 still manage in a durable fashion to suppress the innate antibodies that would normally

16:40 broadly protect against all coronaviruses.

16:43 So what we are talking about here is a catastrophe as well from an individual health viewpoint

16:51 as from a public health viewpoint.

16:55 Over.

16:57 Okay, so in another interview, you mentioned that it's important that the kids are not

17:09 vaccinated from a public health standpoint, but also like the one of the best things we

17:15 could do is to have new children that come into the world that can like be a sponge.

17:20 Could you explain that?

17:22 Sorry, I'm not sure I got this.

17:27 I mean, the acoustics are optimal.

17:31 So I got the first part of your, of your question, but not sure the second part, how you were

17:38 talking about children.

17:39 Yes.

17:40 Children and why new babies are useful to be like a sponge from a public health standpoint.

17:49 Absolutely.

17:50 Absolutely.

17:51 That is all the children and the young, healthy and unvaccinated people, indeed, I consider

18:01 them, I often call them the vacuum cleaners or the sponge, indeed, because thanks to their

18:08 innate antibodies, if you introduce them in a population, remember they come with highly

18:14 functional innate antibodies that have sterilizing capacity that have not been replaced or outcompeted

18:22 by vaccinal antibodies.

18:24 They can now all of a sudden absorb a lot of virus and they will not, they will eliminate

18:30 it.

18:31 There may be some of them, some of them may be shedding for a few days, low quantities,

18:37 but then they will ultimately eliminate the virus.

18:40 And the nicest example of this is when Boris Johnson decided in July of this year to lift

18:52 the infection prevention measures or the lockdown measures.

18:56 And what happened, what happened, well, the non-vaccinated, the unvaccinated people, these

19:01 were primarily the younger age group still, not all of the population was vaccinated back

19:07 in July.

19:08 So there was still a large part of the population, essentially the young healthy population that

19:14 was unvaccinated.

19:16 And all of a sudden they started to intermingle again and to have social contact, society was

19:21 opened up again.

19:23 And what you saw was just tremendous effect of a diminishment of the infectivity rate

19:29 in the population within two weeks.

19:32 So again, if you look at the curve, just cases of the UK in after July 21, you saw a dramatic

19:42 decrease in the infectivity rate that happened within just two weeks.

19:47 So that is illustrating how the influx of young and healthy people that have a huge reservoir

19:55 of innate antibodies that can mediate sterilizing immunity, again, that's why it's not a childhood

20:01 disease.

20:02 And while all young and healthy people, especially youngsters and children, are protected against

20:07 this disease, that this has a very beneficial impact on reducing the infectious pressure

20:14 in the population and literally eliminating the more infectious variants without the vaccinol

20:20 antibodies or just doing the opposite, generating a breeding ground for more infectious variants.

20:27 And again, as I was saying before, you can see in all those countries, especially in

20:32 those who had a very aggressive immunization strategy, that the infectious pressure in

20:38 the population, the infectivity rate, went up and remained very, very high.

20:43 And it don't vanish anymore to bring this pressure down to the levels that existed back,

20:51 let's say, six months or one year ago, overly.

20:57 One more thing.

20:58 Would you be able to explain the, I saw a diagram of what happened in Israel.

21:03 There were three spikes in Israel.

21:09 From your understanding, why, you know, which direction is this going and why is it important

21:17 that they should actually be doing the opposite, not making the massive campaign that they

21:22 are in Israel?

21:23 Well, again, it's not very optimal, but I understand that you're asking me to explain

21:35 the evolution in Israel that we have seen with the several peaks.

21:41 And that I'm not sure, and that you may maybe be asking me also what my prediction is with

21:47 regard to where this is, how this is going to evolve.

21:52 Would that be correct?

21:53 Or?

21:54 Yes.

21:55 Yes.

21:56 Yes.

21:57 Yeah.

21:58 Yeah.

21:59 So what do you think in Israel, I'm sorry, I will start from the previous, not the last

22:05 week, but the one before the third, actually, that was very spectacular.

22:11 When this high rate of infection happened in Israel, you saw all of a sudden a dramatic

22:19 decrease.

22:20 And this was certainly not due to vaccination, because remember Israel started the vaccination

22:28 campaigns when the infection rate was at the highest level at the summit, approximately.

22:34 So it went down very, very rapidly.

22:37 And you will always see this.

22:40 This has nothing.

22:41 The vaccine cannot work that fast.

22:42 It went down within one or two weeks.

22:46 Exactly the same thing you have seen, for example, with the previous peak in India,

22:50 right?

22:51 It was a huge peak.

22:52 All of a sudden, within two weeks, it went down to zero, whereas only 3% of the population

22:58 was vaccinated.

22:59 So these declines are not due to the vaccine, but are simply due to the fact that when the

23:07 virus has exhausted, in fact, the susceptible population.

23:12 So that means the population that has not enough innate immunity, remember people who

23:16 have not enough innate immunity, they will get the disease, of course, and they will

23:22 develop antibodies.

23:23 But all this takes time, none of this is really responsible for a sudden decline.

23:29 What is responsible for a certain decline is when the virus has exhausted the susceptible

23:35 population, then it has to deal with all those who have sufficient innate immunity.

23:41 And when the virus hits this part of the population, as I was saying, because of their strong innate

23:47 immunity that the virus cannot break through, they will eliminate the virus.

23:52 These are the vacuum cleaners, right, the sponges.

23:56 And hence, the infection goes down dramatically.

24:01 So in Israel, you saw after the, I think, the third peak, that the baseline joined basically

24:09 the x-axis and went to zero.

24:12 So I think that the mistake that Israel made at that point was, again, to allow contacts

24:20 to open up society again, et cetera.

24:23 It's not because you don't measure any infectivity, because remember, most of the cases are people

24:32 who are occasionally or accidentally tested as a contact of a case or who have the disease,

24:41 who develop disease, et cetera.

24:43 But we should not forget that this virus, SARS-CoV-2, in contrast to SARS-CoV-1, is

24:51 very notorious for allowing asymptomatic infection.

24:56 So it is possible, it is possible, that people who don't have symptoms, and especially also

25:05 when they are vaccinated, that they can spread the virus.

25:09 And when they spread the virus, and they have, of course, contacts, because remember, the

25:14 society opened up again, then all of a sudden the infectious pressure can mount again in

25:21 that population.

25:23 And when it mounts at a level that is high enough to break through the innate immunity

25:30 of some people who have, in the meantime, become vulnerable, then you will again see

25:36 that the peak starts, and that you have, again, an enhanced rate of infection.

25:42 And Israel reacted pretty late, I mean, people continue to have contacts.

25:48 Once you have this infectivity that goes up, of course, it can go very, very fast.

25:53 So what is happening right now is that Israel was saying, well, you know, these people are

25:59 losing their vaccine protection.

26:02 So what we need to do is to give a booster immunization.

26:07 And although I perfectly concur that this would be the right thing to do in a normal

26:13 situation.

26:14 I mean, in a normal situation, it's outside of the pandemic, but here we are in the midst

26:20 of a pandemic.

26:21 So you have to take, one has to take into account that people are continuously threatened by

26:27 the virus, which is now highly infectious.

26:31 So the likelihood that you get infected is now much, much higher than at the beginning

26:35 of the pandemic.

26:37 And so when people have an increased risk of getting infected, that means that when you

26:45 vaccinate people before they will be able to mount their antibodies or to reach previous

26:53 types of antibodies, they will already be confronted with the virus, many of them.

26:59 So this is a suboptimal situation because they still happen to reach the high levels

27:06 of antibodies and they are already attacked by the virus.

27:10 So the virus encounters a new response that is suboptimal, and this is basically just

27:16 promoting, again, the propagation of more infectious strains, especially given the fact,

27:22 and I mean, we should really stress this, that the third boost, the third dose is still

27:28 the original vaccine.

27:29 It's still not adapted to the predominantly circulating variant, which is now the Delta

27:36 variant.

27:37 So this comes on top of this, that you continue to vaccinate with a vaccine that contains

27:44 a spike protein that is not matching the spike protein of the predominantly circulating variant,

27:56 which is now the Delta variant.

27:58 So this is just, all of this is just putting enhanced more and more immune pressure on

28:04 the virus.

28:06 And what we will see, and I'm personally 200% convinced of this, is by doing this, we will

28:14 simply enhance the resistance.

28:17 So what you will see is, of course, you will see a short-lived effect of this booster,

28:22 of course, a short-lived effect, but the peak is now declining.

28:28 And I tell you, it will not, it will not join the zero X axis, but it will maybe, and I

28:38 can say exactly, in one or two weeks from now, it will start to build a plateau.

28:44 And from this plateau, you will again, have a steep increase in cases.

28:50 And this is just the virus that even becomes more infectious still, because it has been

28:56 put under enhanced under increasing immune pressure, because you, you, you, you are going

29:03 to release again this antibody virus so that the pressure becomes higher than it was before.

29:10 And what I hope is that this will not suffice to already use complete resistance of the

29:18 virus to the vaccines, because then we are in a very miserable situation.

29:22 So that is my explanation of the evolution in Israel and where this is going to go.

29:28 Right.

29:29 Over.

29:30 Yeah.

0:00 Yeah.

0:00 Okay.

0:01 We have Dr. Eric Feintuch.

0:02 I'm going to be introducing Dr. McCullough.

0:05 He's joining us from Texas.

0:06 Dr. McCullough is an internist, a cardiologist, an epidemiologist.

0:11 He practices both internal medicine, including management of common infectious diseases,

0:16 as well as the cardiovascular complications of both the viral and the injuries developed

0:21 after the COVID-19 vaccine in Dallas, Texas.

0:26 Since the onset of the pandemic, Dr. McCullough has been a leader in the medical response

0:30 to the COVID-19 disaster and has published pathophysiological basis and rationale for

0:35 early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which is COVID-19 infection, the first synthesis

0:43 of sequence multi-drug treatment of ambulatory patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the American

0:50 Journal of Medicine, and subsequently updated reviews in cardiovascular medicine.

0:54 He has 46 peer-reviewed publications on the infection.

0:58 Dr. McCullough testified at the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government

1:03 Affairs and in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, the Colorado

1:08 General Assembly, and the New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the pandemic response.

1:13 Dr. McCullough has had one full year of dedicated academic and clinical efforts in combating

1:20 the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and in doing so, has reviewed thousands of reports, participated

1:25 in scientific congresses, group discussions, press releases, and is considered among the

1:31 world's experts in COVID-19.

1:34 Pleasure to have you here, Dr. McCullough.

1:37 Okay, thank you.

1:39 As introduced, I'm Dr. Peter McCullough.

1:40 I'm an internist, cardiologist, and trained epidemiologist in Dallas, Texas.

1:47 Thanks for having me to give my testimony.

1:51 I've given sworn testimony in the U.S. Senate, multiple states, Senate, and other houses

1:56 of legislation.

1:57 My first point is that we are experiencing widespread vaccine failure in the United States,

2:03 and the CDC has reported now, as of October 18th, we have 41,127 well-characterized fully

2:12 vaccinated adults with vaccine failure.

2:16 Of those, 85% of the deaths are in those over the age of 65 and 66% of the hospitalization.

2:24 That's not the universe of cases.

2:27 We know from CMS through the first week in August of 2021 that we have a large-scale

2:39 failure of the vaccines reported through the CMS reporting system, the Center for Medicare

2:50 and Medicaid Services, and in that report, we have now -- again, this is just through

2:57 August 10th, so this is two months behind -- CMS is telling us that we have 161,000 breakthrough

3:05 cases and 33,000 breakthrough hospitalizations, 10,000 of those reported in ICU, and this

3:13 is as the Delta variant has emerged to be 99% of the variants.

3:19 Sadly, 60% of all adults hospitalized with COVID-19 over age 65 are vaccinated, so it's

3:30 important for the audience to understand the vaccines are failing to prevent hospitalization

3:35 in adults, and the public health focus on children is taking attention away from our

3:43 seniors who are still getting COVID-19 despite being vaccinated and are suffering hospitalization

3:51 and death.

3:52 Now, among children, fortunately, this is a mild syndrome.

3:56 I'm a doctor.

3:57 I see these patients in my practice.

3:59 I can tell you childhood COVID-19 is oftentimes less severe than a common cold, and what we

4:05 know there, and from an analysis by Tracy Hogue and colleagues from the University of

4:11 Virginia, Davis, that a young person who takes the COVID-19 vaccine is more likely to be

4:17 hospitalized with myocarditis or heart inflammation and damage than be hospitalized with COVID-19,

4:25 the respiratory illness, so I think this is a very important revelation that the risks

4:31 of COVID-19 vaccination far outweigh any benefits in young individuals, and this will extend

4:38 down to children with ages 5 to 11 now where the risks of COVID-19, the respiratory illness,

4:46 are even milder than individuals in older age groups, so we have a situation now where

4:59 the CDC and FDA have reviewed about 200 cases of myocarditis or heart inflammation in June

5:07 of 2021, and they incorrectly concluded at that time that myocarditis was rare, and I

5:20 was on national TV, and I told Americans at that time as someone who I'm very experienced

5:27 myocarditis was in June, again, the CDC and FDA have 200 cases that they adjudicated as

5:37 we see here today through October is indicating. In June 2021, the CDC and FDA adjudicated

5:46 200 cases of myocarditis in children, and the CDC and FDA made two incorrect conclusions.

5:53 The first one was that myocarditis was rare, and I was on national TV, and I told America

6:01 at that time that that's an incorrect conclusion because we can't make any determination of

6:07 whether or not something's rare unless we check the entire population for it, and the

6:12 more conservative and appropriate phrase to use is tip of the iceberg, meaning that these

6:19 first 200 cases could evolve into a much larger number, and through October 15, 2021, I am

6:26 correct because now the CDC is telling us they have 10,304 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis,

6:35 and these are verified cases, I know because I have reported some of these cases, and the

6:40 CDC calls the doctor and goes through all the data to make sure that these are valid

6:46 cases of myocarditis. The CDC and the FDA also said that myocarditis was rare, and this was

6:54 incorrect because 90% of the cases the CDC and FDA evaluated were hospitalized. When

7:02 a patient is hospitalized in a research study or clinical investigation, this is called

7:08 a serious adverse event. We never call serious adverse events. We never call them mild. In

7:15 fact, that's a completely incorrect, and it's basically a wrongful conclusion that these

7:21 cases are mild. We now know the CDC had 90% hospitalized, 20% of the young individuals

7:31 had abnormal echocardiograms, and had probably signs and symptoms of heart failure, required

7:37 treatment for the prevention or incipient heart failure. This has been my experience

7:41 in clinical practice, and now in the HOGE analysis from University of California, Davis

7:46 using v-safe and VAERS, tracing HOGE also found 86% of these young individuals required

7:53 hospitalization with the exact same pattern that the CDC saw back in June. So I'm telling

7:59 you at this point in time, the FDA warnings on Pfizer and Moderna should be heated by

8:06 children and parents in that the COVID-19 vaccine should not be administered to these

8:12 individuals. And I can tell you, Sweden and Denmark agree because they have halted these

8:18 products for young individuals under age 30 because the risk of myocarditis outweighs

8:24 any possible benefit of vaccination in young individuals. Those are my prepared statements.

8:31 My question is, what are the percentage overall by older people, let's say 70, 80 years old

8:38 people? Would you say that the risk of the virus is outweighing the risk of the vaccine?

8:48 Let's say you give an older age, 90 years old.

8:55 Just to clarify, the risks of the vaccine are greater than the risk of having a younger

9:02 person get the respiratory infection because that young individual, the infection is almost

9:09 always mild. And even if there's severe symptoms, they're easily treatable and hospitalization

9:14 can be avoided. So the vaccine offer more harm to children than going the vaccine and

9:23 taking it.

9:28 Is there an elderly age? Well, is there an age that you could say that the risk of the

9:32 virus is bigger than the risk of the vaccine? That's in 90 years.

9:38 I mean, the analysis by Kostoff colleagues, that's been published, and these papers are

9:46 sitable. I can send them to David or Brucha. I can tell you the Kostoff analysis at all

9:52 age groups found a higher chance of death with the vaccine than taking your chances

9:58 of getting COVID-19 and dying of COVID-19. Because the vaccines don't work now and they

10:05 don't stop Delta, there's a greater chance of harm than any benefit of vaccination.

10:11 Yes, for those who are susceptible, I do believe the vaccines previously had some prevention

10:18 against hospitalization. And that was shown with the now extinct wild type alpha, beta

10:25 and gamma variants in a paper published in MMWR in mid-September by the CDC. So with

10:31 a legacy variants, there was some benefit, but now there are no papers demonstrating

10:36 any benefit of vaccination in the Delta variant. And the vaccines appear to have a very transient

10:44 effect on anything with respect to Delta. That's the reason why in Israel, the vast

10:50 majority of people hospitalized with COVID are fully vaccinated. Now the same thing is

10:56 seen in the UK. The UK is following Israel with the same pattern and the United States

11:01 is following the UK that the vaccines are failing and those who are vaccinated are being

11:07 hospitalized with COVID-19. No, that's incorrect. There's more fully vaccinated who are being

11:15 hospitalized and dying than unvaccinated. And the reason why that's the case is many of

11:20 the unvaccinated have already had the respiratory infection and they've survived it. So they

11:25 can't get COVID-19 a second time. If a person had the infection, is there a greater risk

11:33 if they take the vaccine? If they had an infection and now they take the vaccine, are they at

11:44 greater risk for adverse events? Yes. So someone who's had the respiratory infection, they

11:51 can't get a second respiratory infection. So they can't have any benefit from the vaccine.

11:57 And the FDA and the pharmaceutical companies agree because they excluded these patients

12:02 from the trials. And there are three papers. Raw, Cramor and Methudias all show excess

12:09 harm that occurs when a COVID recovered patient makes the vaccine. So under no circumstances

12:17 should a COVID-19 recovered patient take a vaccine. There's no opportunity for benefit

12:23 and just a chance of getting it done. What you say percentage wise, how does it outweigh

12:33 the risk of the vaccine and the risk of the virus by elderly people? You have some percentage

12:40 that's good. The CDC, the CDC is not reported to America

13:00 on the safety of the vaccines. The CDC is yet to give a monthly report on the relative

13:06 safety of the vaccine. And the CDC is not telling America who is dying after the vaccine.

13:13 But we have analyses from McLacklin, from Queens and London, and from Rose from Canada

13:19 that have shown of the deaths that occur after the vaccine, 50% occur within 48 hours and

13:27 80% occur within a week. And the McLacklin analysis shows, unfortunately, those who are

13:33 dying with the vaccine are the elderly. And so in a striking fashion. And so the analysis

13:42 by Kostoff and colleagues published in toxicology report, unfortunately, finds that at every

13:48 age group, the chances of dying with the vaccine are greater than the chances of risking COVID-19

13:56 and contracting COVID-19. Now that the CDC is telling us that in the elderly, when they

14:01 get COVID-19, the vaccines do not stop hospitalization and death. We can't advise the vaccines through

14:08 any age group and be confident that the benefits outweigh the risks. There are no data right

14:13 now in any age group or comorbidity group that indicate that the benefits outweigh the

14:20 risk of vaccine. It's just the opposite. The risks of death overall, and then the risks

14:25 of myocarditis in young people outweigh any benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine. Well, I

14:32 can tell you, we can look at other reports. So for example, in a low prevalence country

14:39 like Taiwan, Taiwan public health officials are indicating there's more vaccine deaths

14:45 than COVID deaths right now, because COVID-19 is at a low prevalence. In the United States,

14:52 we finished our second big wave. The second wave is called the Delta outbreak. And in

14:58 the Delta outbreak, because of the numerous cases, there are more numerous COVID deaths

15:03 than vaccine deaths, because the rate of vaccination in the United States plummeted in April. Once

15:10 Americans found out the vaccines could be fatal, the Americans stopped accepting the

15:14 vaccines in April. Now the only people getting vaccination in the United States are those

15:20 being forced into it against their will through mandates. You know, the people who are unvaccinated

15:27 at this point in time have made the choice to be unvaccinated. And if they end up being

15:32 hospitalized, you know, that's part of the choice. The people who chose vaccination,

15:38 we've had 250,000 vaccine related hospitalizations, injuries, and office visits. So those who

15:45 took the vaccine that have either died or permanently disabled from the vaccine, in

15:51 a sense, they've been a burden of the health care. So what we're seeing is a representation

15:56 of choice. So right now, in the United States, according to CMS, which is our best data on

16:02 people over 65, 40% in the hospital are unvaccinated, 60% are vaccinated. Israel in the hospital,

16:12 80% are vaccinated, 20% unvaccinated. In the UK, it's about 60% in the hospital vaccinated

16:21 40% unvaccinated. So right now, it's both vaccinated or unvaccinated are being hospitalized.

16:30 We can't blame one group over another. It's not a crisis of one group or another. It's

16:35 a crisis of everybody together. Yes, there appears to be equal risk because the vaccines

16:43 don't work. So the vaccines don't cover Delta now that the Delta variant has achieved antigenic

16:50 escape. And that's been shown in very good papers, one by Venkata, Christian, it shows

16:55 that the vaccines can't cover Delta. So that's the reason why the vaccines have failed. The

17:02 vaccines weren't changed or adjusted to try to basically neutralize the Delta variant.

17:11 So the virus is mutated and the vaccines failed. I think the vaccines previously had an effect

17:17 on the wild type alpha, beta and some gamma, but the vaccines don't appear to have any

17:22 measurable impact impact on Delta.

17:24 I have to go right on to another meeting, David. Thank you. Thank you. Bye bye.

0:05 I'm going to ask, by the way, that we have all the references that he mentioned, all

0:17 the research that he mentioned will be provided to you. I will put out an email to him, and

0:24 you will have that for experts to back up anything he says. So that all that stuff,

0:31 including everything that Dr. Malone mentions as well, which he's going to be discussing

0:34 as well. We'll, the camera thinks over there. Oh, that is good. Thank you. All right. So

0:46 Dr. Robert Malone, thank you for coming from Virginia here personally to make sure you

0:50 could testify at this court session. Dr. Malone is the inventor of the core MRNA technologies,

0:57 including the idea of the MRNA vaccines. He was extensive experience in clinical trials,

1:05 vaccines, gene therapy, immunology, pharmaceutical and biotechnological industries. All this makes

1:13 Dr. Malone an important witness today to address the safety of the shots. There's a little

1:20 bit more here. I'm just going to let you do it, but I'm going to make sure that everyone

1:23 has your CV, which is a pretty heavy thing, but they can take it home with them. But everyone

1:29 will have the data as well about all the extensive amounts. If anything you want to share, that's

1:33 up to you. But I really thank you for coming from Virginia today.

1:38 I'd like to thank all of you for the opportunity to speak with you. I hope that I can help

1:57 you with what's a very challenging set of decisions. I think all leaders right now,

2:04 whether academic leaders, government leaders, leaders of religious communities and leaders

2:13 of other communities in general, face some really challenging questions in an environment

2:20 in which information is being very carefully controlled and in some cases suppressed. In

2:26 other cases, the appearance is fairly clear that information is being manipulated. I can't

2:34 speak to why this is happening and who's behind it. It's outside of the scope of this discussion

2:40 and my core competence. I'd like to start off, however, by addressing this question

2:47 that you face of who are the experts.

3:17 Just give me a clue where I should start. You can all dance for me.

3:39 Yes, so the AV people have to solve that. That's why I'm holding the mic here instead of using

3:47 a stand. Okay, are we ready? Tell me. I'll just start from the beginning. My name is

4:00 Robert Malone. I'm a physician scientist. I'm grateful for the opportunity to speak

4:05 to you and I hope that the information that I share can help you with what I know to be

4:11 a difficult decision. It's a difficult decision for you as leaders of your religious community

4:18 and leaders of moral leaders, I think, in a more broad sense, global moral leaders really.

4:26 I think that's part of your mission. We have an individual challenge here in terms of rights

4:35 of individuals to determine their own future and determine whether or not they wish to

4:40 accept a medical procedure. I think this is a fundamental right of choice that the individual

4:46 has over their own body. You have responsibilities to provide guidance for your community and

4:54 then you have responsibilities to provide moral leadership, I believe, as do many religious

5:01 leaders in this world for the entire population of the world. In this environment, there's

5:13 two voices that I'm not hearing enough of. I'm not hearing enough from the children that

5:19 are being impacted by these decisions and how they're impacting them and I'm not hearing

5:24 enough from moral leaders. We're hearing a lot from scientists and bureaucrats and politicians

5:33 but we're not hearing enough from our moral leadership and I hope that I can help you

5:41 to think through these difficult decisions and help provide that moral leadership, which

5:49 I believe is sorely lacking. I think that many of the issues that we're facing here

5:55 are fundamentally moral issues. They're big issues about the rights of individuals and

6:03 the rights of society and the desire to contribute to the greater good, I think, is a very important

6:11 moral imperative but that has the rights of the individual to control their own body and

6:21 their own destiny. That's my personal opinion. Now, I'm understanding within your community

6:28 that there's an important topic of who are the experts and who are the experts that merit

6:37 providing testimony and advice on these topics and the challenge that you face in that you're

6:44 hearing conflicting messages. Dr. McCullough, for instance, just testified as one of the

6:51 most eminent scholars and practicing physicians in the United States, if not the world, an

6:58 enormous number of publications and yet you're hearing very different messages from Dr. Fauci

7:06 and other administrative leaders within the government that are subject to the pressures

7:14 and the politics of national leadership within the U.S. government. I suggest for your consideration

7:27 that what one observes is many physicians, frontline physicians, that are doing their

7:35 job as best they can on a daily basis, are very deeply trained in following leadership

7:45 and the centralized communication and information provided by the Centers for Disease Control

7:53 and Protection. The challenge with relying on those types of information in the World

8:01 Health Organization is that the information that those bodies rely on is typically about

8:10 four to six months out of date. What this results in is a situation in which the official guidance

8:38 that's provided to practicing physicians that are just trying to do their job on a daily

8:45 basis is typically about four to six months out of date. In a rapidly moving pandemic

8:52 or epidemic, what I've seen as somebody who has been involved in managing these and leading

8:59 in technology space and application for 30 years now, what I observe again and again

9:06 and again is that these large governmental organizations typically lag in their response

9:14 to the actual data by many months. They rely on consensus decision making and they rely

9:24 on what they believe to be fully verified data. And so as a consequence, they're providing

9:31 directions in this case, for instance, to practicing physicians based on information

9:37 that, for instance, is largely coming from the original strains of the virus and because

9:43 that information takes a long time to get processed and then determined as policy. And

9:50 what we've had, unfortunately, is that the scenario that Dr. VandenBosch has been envisioning

9:59 is coming to pass in real time. And we're seeing the evolution, the selection of new

10:05 viral variants under the pressure of these vaccines that are escaping the ability of

10:11 the vaccines to control that infection. So we know of this as Delta. Now there's Delta

10:17 Plus is moving rapidly into the population. And there is a reasonable prospect that you

10:24 will see a wave of infection here in New York and throughout the states from Delta Plus

10:30 later on this winter. So what to do about it? That's the challenge we all face. And

10:37 how can you guide your community to do this? And right now, in my opinion, the leading

10:47 edge of this very difficult decision has to do with whether or not you believe that it's

10:54 appropriate to vaccinate your children and the children in your community. I believe

11:00 that is both a moral challenge and a scientific technical challenge to work through that

11:08 decision. I believe that the decision is fairly straightforward. And this I wish to read into

11:17 your record a declaration from thousands of physicians that have developed this as a consensus

11:24 statement. This is the same group of over 10,000 physicians worldwide that developed

11:29 the Physicians Declaration in Rome and have endorsed that. That's the declaration that

11:34 we believe that physicians have the right to practice medicine. And that specifically

11:39 relates to early treatment and the efforts that have been made to stop physicians like

11:46 Dr. Zelenko and Peter and many others from practicing medicine as they see fit to save

11:53 their patients' lives. So regarding this resolution, we believe that healthy children

11:59 should not be forced to vaccinate. The reason for that is that there are negligible clinical

12:05 risks from the virus, as Peter has just enumerated with you, that the vaccines provide little,

12:13 if any, clinical protection for most children, that the risk of severe and life-threatening

12:20 adverse events from the vaccines far outweigh any theoretical benefits in terms of providing

12:30 protection to children from these vaccines from the circulating virus. The children generally

12:36 do not get life-threatening disease from this virus. Their immune systems are better than

12:42 ours. They have innate immunity and other assets in their immune response that those

12:49 of us that are elders, as our immune systems age, they become less effective. But the immune

12:56 systems in our children are very potent and very able to take care of this virus with

13:02 few exceptions. Please keep in mind that there has been in the range of 400 deaths total

13:09 in children since the beginning of this outbreak that the CDC is able to attribute to this

13:15 virus. And remember that that means deaths with the virus, not necessarily deaths from

13:21 the virus. That is an important distinction because every single one of these children

13:26 have pre-existing conditions, major pre-existing health problems. So this virus is not a cause

13:33 of disease and death in children. Now, in contrast, the respiratory syncytial virus is.

13:39 And we heard from the press and the CDC a lot of fear about viruses and feeling hospitals

13:47 at the beginning. You will recall this a few months ago and how the children were filling

13:51 the hospitals in the southern states. That was all false information. That was due to

13:56 respiratory syncytial virus, which, by the way, is another lab escape virus that happened

14:02 in the 1950s. That is how that virus got into the population. That virus kills young people.

14:08 This virus does not. The long-term safety of current COVID vaccines in children cannot

14:16 be determined. How do we know that they can't be determined? Because we know that there

14:21 has not been that much time, just the same as the risks in pregnancy cannot be determined.

14:26 The risks of birth defects cannot be determined. I'm not saying that there is major risks in

14:32 pregnancy or risks of birth defects. I'm not saying there isn't. What I'm saying is we

14:38 don't know. The data don't exist. They can't exist because we haven't had enough time for

14:44 that to elapse and determine what those risks are associated with the vaccine. So it's very

14:49 simple. Secondly, we're resolved that naturally immune persons recovered from SARS-CoV-2

14:58 shall not be subject to any restrictions or vaccine mandates. As Peter said, and I've

15:03 experienced personally, I'm a COVID recovered individual. I was infected in late February

15:10 2020, and I had long COVID, and then I accepted the vaccine, Moderna in my case, and I had

15:18 a response that is not that unusual. I developed hypertension with a systolic of over 220,

15:29 so serious hypertension that was life-threatening. Fortunately, it was controlled. After vaccination,

15:36 I also developed after vaccination central nervous system symptoms, and this is common,

15:41 particularly for people that have already had the infection. The infection, if recovered,

15:49 which that's another one of my key messages, please understand that we have been subjected

15:54 to fear, constant fear, constant information, pushing fear, pushing fear into our children,

16:01 pushing fear into our families, pushing fear into our communities. We've been bombarded

16:06 with it, and here in New York, of course, you've experienced the direct effect of the

16:11 first wave, which was enormously threatening. But the truth is that if you're under 65 and

16:18 you don't have major preexisting conditions like morbid obesity, which I don't see any

16:24 morbid obesity on this table at all, the probability of you being hospitalized or dying from this

16:31 virus is significantly less than 1%. In the highest risk categories, it moves up to about

16:39 5% risk of mortality. So many people believe that if they get infected, and I believe this

16:46 when I was infected in February of 2020, I thought I was going to die, because that's

16:52 what we've all been told, all this fear. The truth is that overwhelming majority of all

16:58 of us will recover just fine and we will develop natural immunity. Natural immunity is more

17:04 protective and lasts longer, and it's better in terms of selection of virus escape mutants

17:11 than the vaccine-induced immunity, which is against a single protein, and that is why

17:17 these viruses are able to evolve to escape that type of immunity against that single protein.

17:23 So I wanted to really get across, this isn't in the prepared talks, but it was an opportunity

17:29 to make the point, we have to overcome this fear. And I believe that this is something

17:36 that we can give to all of our communities by acting locally, by providing information,

17:42 and in your cases by providing guidance to your families and those that are under your

17:50 guidance. Let's drop the fear. This is not Ebola. This is not a highly lethal virus.

18:01 We're giving all this message that it is, but it is not a highly lethal virus. There

18:07 are more children that die from influenza typically than die from this virus, or die

18:13 with this virus, I should say. And I particularly focused on the children right now because

18:18 of the current situation and the pressure from the government to vaccinate all the children.

18:24 So natural immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity, both in terms of duration and breath.

18:34 It is the most protective and longest lasting against the development of the disease and

18:39 more serious outcomes. Naturally immune persons are at the lowest risk of transmission, should

18:45 not be subject to travel, professional medical or social restrictions. Natural immunity provides

18:51 the best source of herd immunity. This nirvana that we all seek where we can go back to normal

18:57 and as a population we're no longer bombarded by the disease caused by this virus is herd

19:04 immunity. We all wish to achieve that. And the logic of accepting vaccine on behalf of

19:12 the community I think is noble. And I wish that we had a vaccine that was sufficiently

19:18 effective and sufficiently safe, that those that in the nobility of their own choice wish

19:27 to accept the risk of that vaccine for the benefit of the community, I wish that that

19:33 gesture that they're making voluntarily, in most cases I hope, unfortunately many cases

19:39 mandated. I wish that that was a gesture that would lead us to this goal that we all seek

19:45 which is herd immunity. Unfortunately these vaccines, now that the virus has evolved to

19:51 escape them, will not get us there. So people are accepting this risk out of the goodness

19:57 of their heart for the purpose of the community and it's not doing any good. It's not providing

20:03 benefit. It's not achieving the objective. Health agencies should be prohibited from

20:09 interfering with physicians' ability. We as a community believe that all health agencies

20:16 and institutions self-cease interfering with physicians treating individual patients. Dr.

20:23 Zelenko within your community is clearly one of the world leaders that have pioneered early

20:29 treatments. We're all very grateful for his leadership and yet he's been subjected to

20:35 enormous pressure from political forces, from the press, etc., derision, even threats and

20:44 this must stop, we believe. Health agencies must be prohibited from interfering with physicians.

20:51 No medicine already given regulatory approval shall be restricted from use, off-label use.

20:57 An early intervention with numerous agents, including those that Dr. Zelenko has identified,

21:03 ones that I've identified that are currently in clinical trials funded by the U.S. Army

21:09 and many others that have been identified all over the world, can be used. The good

21:15 news about this virus is that it has two phases in the disease and not everybody gets the

21:22 second phase. The viral phase is the first part is more like influenza and it lasts for

21:30 five to seven days. That is not what kills you. What kills you is your body's response

21:36 to that virus and to the virus fragments that remain in circulation after that period of

21:42 time. This hyper-inflammatory response is what destroys your lungs and destroys your

21:48 other organs and causes you to go to the hospital and be subjected to the drugs and the

21:53 procedures that they perform in the hospital. The good news is that the pharmaceutical companies

21:59 have developed fantastic anti-inflammatory agents and, by the way, one of the ones that

22:05 works quite well is called aspirin. Aspirin, this is a disease of blood clotting and aspirin

22:13 is a very good initial agent that's known to be safe that prevents blood clotting and

22:19 also blocks -- now I'm going to get a little technical. This is virology, molecular biology

22:25 talk. The virus specifically turns on a promoter, a switch in the genes of those that get infected

22:36 and it's called COX-2. The virus has two different pathways that it uses to turn on that inflammation.

22:43 One of them happens to be spike protein based. So there's two pathways that the virus uses

22:49 to turn on COX-2. COX-2 then triggers a whole cascade of inflammation and that cascade of

22:57 inflammation in somebody like myself that already has some pro-inflammatory state, perhaps

23:03 because I'm a little heavier than I should be or I have allergies and these other things,

23:08 causes this cascade, this self-feedback cascade that triggers the overall disease that damages

23:16 your lungs and your body. So COX-2 is one of the inciting events. The virus turns it on.

23:23 Aspirin is a COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitor. It also blocks platelet aggregation and this is largely

23:30 a disease of platelet aggregation. I mention this just because this is one of very many

23:36 anti-inflammatory agents that are available and again I acknowledge Dr. Zalenko and Peter

23:44 Richard Urso, Pierre Corey, many other leaders that have developed these protocols for staged

23:51 intervention with existing drugs to stop the inflammatory cascade. When you add those things

23:57 together we can save the elders if we treat them early as Dr. Zalenko has been teaching us.

24:04 So a lot of this fear also about the risks of the elders is artificial. It's about the risks

24:12 in elders who are not well treated and so this is one of my other messages I hope a gift to you

24:19 and it's one that I'm trying to emphasize with communities all around the world right now

24:24 is in this environment right now where for whatever reason physicians are discouraged

24:31 from treating patients in the outpatient environment which is frankly bizarre.

24:37 I've never heard of any of this. You have medical providers in your community.

24:42 I'm sure they're all committed to providing treatments as soon as possible to patients

24:48 when they start to develop disease and that's the big lesson here is if you do provide treatments

24:54 early on in the course of this disease you'll keep your people out of the hospital in the

24:59 first place. So I suggest that there are many agents we allow physicians to treat.

25:07 We treat as early as possible and that in preparation for what may be another wave of

25:14 Delta Plus that may move through New York and your communities sometime later this winter

25:20 is the current projections. You may wish to consider setting up local-based communities,

25:30 chat groups, call centers, whatever so that you can when somebody identifies

25:37 or you can identify somebody that's starting to have symptoms you can get early intervention

25:42 to them with physicians oversight and then you can follow up so that they have a contact

25:49 so they're not left at home alone at risk of dying.

25:54 So I think that right now one of the things that you can do that will empower you as a

25:59 community is to set up a local response capability that's focused on your people.

26:05 You can't save all of New York City but I'm pretty sure that you can save your people

26:10 if you put the systems in place now and hopefully over time this virus will become less lethal

26:18 if we don't do what we're doing which is hyper vaccinating into the face of the epidemic

26:24 as Gert has warned us about repeatedly.

26:28 Now there's some specific points that I was asked to address and I don't know how much

26:34 time I have but I'll speak as long as you wish me to and I'll be glad to take questions.

26:39 One of those points has to do with reproductive risks and I've mentioned before that the honest

26:48 truth is we don't have the data that I can share with you or Peter or anybody else can

26:53 share with you about whether or not there are risks in pregnancy and risks of birth

26:59 effect we don't know right now.

27:02 There are data suggesting there may be and there are some curious findings that I understand

27:08 are of particular relevance to your community.

27:11 Clearly the vaccines are associated with alterations in women's periods and their cycles

27:18 and those alterations affect the timing, the frequency, the duration and everything else

27:25 and I'm understanding that this is new information to me about your community but this is a topic

27:32 of particular interest for which the rabbis have deep understanding and my understanding

27:40 is that you have direct personal experience verifying that these effects on the cycle

27:46 of women are happening.

27:48 There are data suggesting that there may be increased risk of premature abortion,

27:55 spontaneous abortion in the first and second trimester rather than the third trimester

28:01 is the period where there's the least risk of spontaneous abortion and we're not seeing

28:07 data about vaccine effects there.

28:10 My advice to young women when they ask me about accepting the vaccine is that if you

28:16 must feel like you must take it, it's probably best to take it before you become pregnant

28:22 but then that will interfere with your menses and it may interfere with your ability to

28:26 become pregnant or you should wait after the completion of the pregnancy and then take

28:31 the vaccine.

28:32 That's my personal advice because we don't have the information to know about how safe

28:36 it is or it isn't.

28:38 Let's see if I can pick a couple of other key points which provides more robust protection

28:47 than vaccine or natural immunity.

28:49 Hopefully, in the question of why virologists warn against over vaccinating the population,

28:59 are we over vaccinating now?

29:00 This was the point of Geert Vanden Bossche's testimony.

29:03 This is his key insight and my understanding is that it's useful for you to understand

29:09 that Gert is a veterinary vaccinologist.

29:11 I used to work with him at the company called Solvay and Gert comes from a community in

29:18 the Netherlands that generally doesn't believe in vaccinating flocks and herds.

29:26 The policies there are in order to keep the food supply clean of viruses.

29:32 They prefer not to vaccinate and not to treat but rather to sacrifice those herds if they

29:41 do become infected.

29:43 So that's where he's coming from is the observation in veterinary practice that if you have a virus,

29:49 for instance, Merrick's disease, move into a chicken flock, it's best to sacrifice that

29:54 entire chicken flock.

29:56 If you start vaccinating into that chicken flock reproducibly, you will get more virulent

30:02 virus.

30:03 That means it causes worse disease.

30:04 It replicates at higher levels because you will be selecting for those types of viruses

30:10 by vaccinating into the epidemic.

30:13 So in their population, I'm given to understand that this is important because of your role

30:20 and appreciation of food and food integrity and food cleanliness, that the policy in the

30:26 Netherlands in general, that in the community that Gert comes from, believes strongly in

30:33 this and that's where his core competency is coming from is this deep veterinary experience

30:40 in dealing with vaccine outbreaks and when you can vaccinate and when not to vaccinate.

30:45 And they as a general group in that country have a policy of not vaccinating veterinary

30:52 animals for this very reason that they don't want to have endemic virus develop in their

30:59 food supply.

31:00 Let's see other questions.

31:05 I've spoken to why we have this discordance between people like Peter and myself and Gert

31:13 that are out in the forefront and Dr. Zelenko versus the physicians that are just routinely

31:20 doing what they're told.

31:21 This is what they're trained to do.

31:23 They're trained to follow the directions from the authority figures.

31:27 And unfortunately in this case, the virus is moving so quickly, the authority figures

31:32 are always behind what's actually happening.

31:36 So this is part of why you're asking me for my testimony, and I'm coming here to share

31:41 this with you, is my point of view as somebody who's out on the very front edge constantly

31:46 looking for what the risks are, trying to understand them, trying to predict what's

31:51 going to happen.

31:53 I can't predict fully, but I do think there's a good chance that we're going to see more

31:57 and more vaccine resistant virus, and as Peter has eloquently described and has covered in

32:07 this manuscript that Peter was citing that will be made available to you in this graphic,

32:12 and then also this declaration which has, I think, is it being displayed now?

32:18 So the declaration that will be shared with you has 40 or 50 references that you can refer

32:24 to and I know that data and this kind of technical information is important to your community.

32:33 So these references have been sorted into these three key points that I mentioned, that

32:38 the recovered immunity is durable, that physicians should be allowed to practice, and that vaccinating

32:46 children means that you're going to expose them to unnecessary risks.

32:50 So with that, I hope that I haven't overstayed my welcome.

32:54 I thank you for your attention.

32:55 I hope this was helpful, and I'm glad to take any questions.

32:59 So with regard to heart inflammation, do you speak a little bit about the possibility of heart reduction that's not a hospital, but the child has a certain sense of heart reduction and damage from the vaccine, and also mental reduction?

33:23 And so the damage that's been doing to our children through this pandemic is not just due to the virus.

33:32 It's also due to the social isolation.

33:35 Children and the fear, this constant fear that is being put on our children.

33:40 So children need to have social interaction in order for their brains to grow and develop.

33:47 This is crucial.

33:49 There's now data showing that this cohort of children are having a significant reduction in measurable IQ, not just from the virus, but from all of this other social environment that we're placing them under, where they're constantly subjected to fear.

34:06 The child that's grasping their mother and having to wear a mask, always afraid whether or not their parents are going to die, all of this fear and fear and fear that's being put in our children is damaging their mental health.

34:19 They're having depression, we're seeing a spike in child suicide that we've never seen before.

34:25 It's shocking.

34:26 The children are being harassed, the ones that have not accepted vaccination in their school environments, it is a huge tragedy.

34:36 In addition to that, this signal, you've heard this word myocarditis, this is a medical term, what it means is damage to the heart, and this damage to the heart is not fully understood, but it's clearly associated with the vaccines.

34:56 Why has this damage to the heart been able to be seen in children and does it happen in adults?

35:03 The answer is because children have almost no heart disease without something else happening.

35:09 In the normal background, children don't have heart disease, and so when you start seeing heart disease in children, you know there's something wrong.

35:19 We are seeing that signal of heart disease in children, and that was the first very clear signal that the CDC acknowledged.

35:28 The data now are coming out more and more that this heart disease isn't just in children, it was just most easily seen in children.

35:35 It also affects the adults, it affects the young adults.

35:39 The heart disease in children in general is about six times higher than the risk of death in children associated with this virus.

35:50 It's a small risk, but it is about six times higher than the risk associated with the virus itself.

35:58 Unfortunately, it's also about three times higher in young men than it is in women.

36:03 This probably has to do with androgens, and one of the treatments for early intervention is an antiandrogen drug.

36:12 So there seems to be something about androgens and males that contributes to a higher risk of this heart disease.

36:19 Now, how significant is this?

36:22 This is very hard to get information, and you were asking appropriately for that information,

36:28 and Peter was basically in a position where he couldn't give it to you, because it doesn't exist.

36:34 Why doesn't exist?

36:35 It's a whole host of factors, but there are very strong disincentives for physicians to report these things to the CDC.

36:43 It's a lot of paperwork, they get a lot of pushback, there's a lot of reasons not to report this, and so it's being underreported.

36:50 Now, there are our leaders and investigative reporters, and I suspect we're going to be hearing from an attorney shortly that will speak to this.

37:01 What we are starting to see in the globe population, looking at all-cause mortality, is there seems to be a spike in excess death,

37:13 particularly excess cardiac death, in the U.S., Great Britain, and German databases.

37:20 Why is this excess death that's over the baseline of everything that's been seen before?

37:26 We can't say whether-how much of this is due to the virus and how much is due to the vaccine,

37:32 but we definitely know that the vaccine is contributing to this.

37:35 I hope I've answered your question.

37:37 In terms of the central nervous system problem, both the vaccine-well, here, we're just focusing on the vaccine, not the virus.

37:46 The vaccine does affect the central nervous system.

37:51 We do have symptoms of-we call it brain fog.

37:54 These are consistent with opening the blood-brain barrier, which is kind of a key protective wall that exists between things that are circulating in your blood and the special compartment of the brain.

38:05 So in terms of damaging to the thought process and the mental health of people, particularly children,

38:13 we're having damage from the vaccine, and we're also having damage from the policies that are isolating our children and subjecting them into fear.

38:23 Have I answered your question?

38:26 Yes. Just-is there any data about how much IQ the kids are going down?

38:33 I hesitate to say, because I haven't reviewed the actual paper, what I've heard report is that it may be as much as 20 points.

38:40 With regards to the heart reduction, is there-could you explain a little bit that you can vaccinate a bunch of kids and they actually-they won't report with myocarditis,

38:58 but they will have-they will notice that in their performance, they have a heart reduction ability.

39:02 So you can have kids that you-they just lost their ability to play basketball.

39:06 So he's speaking of-when we talk about myocarditis and the CDC data, it's important to recognize that what the CDC is capturing is clinically significant myocarditis.

39:19 So this is disease that's so bad that it's put a child in the hospital.

39:23 If a child is in the hospital, as Peter testified, there is no such thing as mild carditis in the hospital.

39:29 And it's important to recognize the heart does not heal, it does not regenerate, it scars.

39:35 And there are long-term consequences of having scars in your heart, those can include this disease of sudden cardiac death due to aberrant electrical rhythms.

39:46 Okay, so scarring of the heart is never trivial, it's never minor.

39:52 That's a misnomer.

39:55 When a child or an adult goes to the hospital with a heart problem, that's a severe problem.

40:03 But that's only the tip of the iceberg.

40:06 How do we know that?

40:08 What we're hearing from the individuals that are in the athletic communities, the highly competitive individuals that are functioning at the very top level of their performance capabilities, and they're being monitored.

40:22 These are professional athletes, triathletes, people like this, as well as military personnel that have to be very high performing physically.

40:33 The reason these communities are so hesitant about accepting vaccine is they know that they can be monitored, they are being monitored, and after they accept vaccine, they're seeing numeric indicators that their function, their bodily function, their ability to perform and exert themselves and have stamina is being reduced, is being reduced, you know, 10%, 15%.

40:57 This is not clinically significant, it wouldn't put them in the hospital, but it can be monitored and recognized, so it appears that a large fraction of people are having some damage.

41:08 Now, how else can we measure that?

41:10 Well, if one monitors for this laboratory test called D-dimer, D-dimer is something in the blood that can be detected, and D-dimer is an indicator of the blood clotting problems that happen in the very small vessels.

41:27 As opposed to the big clots that we're familiar with, like current or pelvis and get thrown into our lungs.

41:33 D-dimer measures very small clots, and it's known that D-dimer elevation is associated with the virus infection, but in about 60% of patients that receive vaccine, if you test for D-dimer beforehand and you test for D-dimer levels afterwards, the D-dimers are elevated after vaccine.

41:53 So we clearly know that the vaccine is causing this small vessel coagulation, and the small vessel coagulation seems to be associated with the cardiac damage.

42:04 I've answered that question.

42:05 Yes, regarding the ovaries, is there any data regarding the effect that the vaccine could have on the ovaries? And also pregnancy, like the blood clots, how significant could they be affecting the placenta and the development of a baby?

42:26 So this question of why are we seeing these alterations in MNCs and why are we seeing -- these are things we know are happening. They're not theoretical.

42:36 There are alterations in MNCs. Your community knows that there's alterations in MNCs because you're monitoring those things, okay?

42:43 So you know it's happening in the community that you help and that you serve. There are data which were released by the Japanese government, but otherwise hidden by the USFDA and the European Medicines Agency.

43:03 There were submitted by Pfizer in association with its mRNA product, which now is called Comernity. And those are often overinterpreted.

43:14 What those data show is that this formulation, this product that's injected, has many parts. One of those parts is the RNA. The RNA makes the spike protein.

43:27 Then there's a fat, like butter, that wraps around the RNA and makes it possible for the RNA to slip into cells.

43:35 That fat is synthetic. It has been made in the laboratory. It's never been used widely in humans before. We don't know whether it's toxic or not toxic.

43:46 What we do know from those Pfizer data is that this fat, after the injection is made, these fats end up accumulating in tissues that we wouldn't expect them to accumulate.

44:00 One of those tissues is the ovary. Is this important? Is this chemical that is accumulating in the ovary affecting ovarian function, and perhaps that might be part of what's going on with the menstruation?

44:14 The answer is we don't have the data because the CDC and the FDA rushed everything, and they didn't ask the pharmaceutical companies to do the rigorous studies that they would normally do to answer this question.

44:29 And so we don't have the information. I wish we did. So in response to your question about this, the potential risks associated with this new drug compound, these cationic lipids that are used to slip the RNA into cells, we don't know how safe it is or isn't.

44:48 We do know that it accumulates in ovarian tissue. In terms of the placentation and all of that, we know that these vaccines are causing small blood clots.

45:03 We know that the placenta is a highly vascular organ and that the ability of blood to flow through the placenta is crucial for the ability to move oxygen and nutrients across to baby.

45:18 So is this an effect which is triggering some of these phenomena like potentially spontaneous abortions in the first and second trimester or other things? Again, I'm sorry to tell you, I don't know the answer, but it is a plausible explanation for some of these phenomena.

45:40 Thank you. A question regarding the because there's a mass production and different companies are producing it, there could be impurities that go into the production.

45:52 You know, when a person receives the vaccine, they don't know what they're getting and the storage, perhaps there was improper storage throughout the custody.

46:00 So a person can be getting a vaccine that is no longer viable and actually perhaps dangerous and then the delivery, there's a small chance that it could be delivered into the wrong way and also that could be another mechanism of damage.

46:14 So I'm going to take the last one and then go backwards in your questions, best of my ability. The inadvertent administration of the mRNA vaccine products and remember of the three products available in the United States for vaccines, the J&J adenovirus vectored vaccine, which is also a gene therapy technology applied to vaccinology, the adenovirus.

46:39 That has the highest number of adverse events per dose of any of the three of these.

46:45 Okay, so we should just focus on the mRNA. But in terms of the mRNA, there's a series of mouse studies that show that if you inject the mRNA formulations into the tail vein of the mouse, you reproducibly get large areas of damage to the heart of the mouse.

47:03 And we have this observation of heart damage in people and children. And so is this related to inadvertent direct administration of the formulation through the veins of the body as opposed to into the tissue of the muscle and then slow release.

47:22 And that is a formal possibility that that's driving part of that. Now let's see if I can remember the rest of the questions. Yeah. So for some reason, the pharmaceutical companies have found it necessary to not disclose the full spectrum of ingredients that are in the vial.

47:46 My understanding is this is also important to you as a community, is that anything that's to be injected should be understood in terms of specifically what's in that material.

47:57 And I guess because of their own policies and practices, they don't perhaps, they don't want competitors to copy their product or whatever. They're not disclosing what's in that vial.

48:07 And there's many this is this has led to much speculation about graphene oxide and other potential contaminants. And I can't speak to whether graphene oxide is present in these or not.

48:20 I know it's a common environmental contaminant that many of us have encountered. But there is a glass chips and potential what appear to be metal chips in some of these vials.

48:32 In vaccine manufacturing, there is a formal process that has to happen at very high speed to produce this quantity of vaccines.

48:42 And because of those processes, sometimes the machinery is is worn or it's misaligned during the fill finish, they go into glass vials.

48:54 And sometimes if the machinery doing this isn't properly calibrated, you can end up with glass chips in the vials.

49:01 And this has caused some of these lots of vaccine that have gone out in large numbers, for instance, Japan, to be pulled back.

49:09 So why would that happen? There's normally a process that is very rigorous that ensures that we test the quality of each product as it's coming off the line by sampling a subset of those vials.

49:24 And the fact that we're seeing vials with some of these contaminant materials in them suggests that that may not be done properly, the follow through.

49:34 You know, this would be akin, I understand this as a community that understands diamonds and diamond polishing and diamond manufacturing.

49:41 This would be akin to sending out diamonds without having a senior person check them to make sure they're properly processed and ground.

49:50 And, you know, that might happen if if you were doing this at very high volumes, that would be understandable.

49:57 But it wouldn't make for good quality diamond product and similar with the vaccines.

50:03 The quality assurance is a central part of ensuring that you have an unadulterated product.

50:09 And the question that you're really asking about is what we use this term adulteration, which is that even if we didn't know what's supposed to be in the vial,

50:19 is that in fact what's actually in the vial?

50:21 And the only way we know that is if those vials are rigorously tested and sampled from each lot in a quality controlled fashion.

50:29 And there's appearance that in the rush to put out so much of this stuff, that may have slipped a bit.

50:35 I hope that answered that question. Yes, sir.

50:37 As of now, is the vaccine licensed?

50:42 That's a great question.

50:44 So the FDA did an interesting thing.

50:50 There is a licensed vaccine called Commernity.

50:53 It's produced by BioNTech.

50:55 It is available in Europe.

50:56 It is not available in the United States.

50:59 The product that is available called Pfizer, which the FDA says that the stuff in the vial is virtually identical to Commernity, but legally it's distinct, is under emergency use authorization.

51:13 So that's the Pfizer product, which is not licensed.

51:17 It's under EUA.

51:18 The BioNTech is licensed, but there is no timetable available for when that will be made available into the United States.

51:26 What's the difference?

51:28 We don't know, but we know that it's the packaging, the package insert that describes the risks and benefits, the labeling, all of the things that go into the final product.

51:38 A final vaccine product is not just the stuff that's in the tube.

51:43 It's all of the quality assurance.

51:45 It's the labeling, everything else that goes with it.

51:48 That product that the FDA has licensed, as soon as that comes onto the market, that will require that BioNTech starts doing studies that haven't been done, that the FDA has said these studies haven't been done, so we don't know this information.

52:03 And you're going to have to do it, BioNTech, as soon as you start marketing this.

52:07 What are those studies?

52:09 Safety in children, safety in pregnancy, and birth defects.

52:15 Okay, we don't know that information because those studies haven't been done.

52:20 And for some reason, the company that's received the license, that with that license, they were told they were going to have to do these studies.

52:28 As soon as they make that product available in the United States, that company seems to not be wishing to make that product available in the United States.

52:36 You can draw your own conclusions.

52:38 Now, why are they rushing it for children?

52:41 If it's not licensed still, as of now, what is the reason why they are giving the lawsuit for children?

52:49 There's no mandate for children here.

52:52 There's no risk, it's not licensed, so what is now?

52:56 I agree with you.

52:58 I think, personally, I think this is madness.

53:01 I do not think this is science-based.

53:03 I think it's fear-based.

53:05 I think that there's a lot of people that are driven crazy by fear and they feel like they have to have something, and they've been told that the children are a threat to them.

53:15 The children are not a threat to them, but many people in the population, in general, believe these fear stories.

53:23 They believe that the children are a threat to them, are a threat to their grandparents, are a threat to their teachers, and they're not.

53:30 The only reason they would be a threat to their teachers and their grandparents is because the vaccine doesn't work.

53:36 And that's a true fact, but it's not the children that are driving the problem.

53:42 And vaccinating the children, as Gert has said, is just going to make the problem worse.

53:47 We have a problem of what is right and ethical for the person, and whether or not mandating somebody to accept a product is morally correct, I believe it's not.

54:00 We have a question of what's right for the community.

54:03 Is vaccinating children really going to make your community safer?

54:06 The answer is not.

54:08 It's actually going to create risk for your children.

54:11 And then we have the problem of the broader human population.

54:14 Is vaccinating children going to provide benefit for that?

54:17 And the answer, as Gert has testified, is that it's actually going to drive the development of higher pathogenicity, higher infectivity, vaccine-escaping mutants.

54:28 So it fails on all steps, and I strongly disagree with the decisions that are being made about this.

54:34 And thank you for asking.

54:35 So my next question.

54:37 By children, what are the percentage of spreading the disease?

54:42 I'm sorry, what are the percentage of children that are experiencing the disease?

54:46 Let's say by older people, they spread more or less?

54:52 Oh, the effect of children spreading the disease.

54:55 That's specifically addressed in the references that I've provided for you.

54:59 Then you can look through those about 20 references.

55:02 And in general, although children do contribute to people, children do infect their parents if their parents aren't vaccinated or aren't protected.

55:13 In general, the children are not the major drivers of infection and spread in the population.

55:18 So my next question, I will be.

55:19 So if they, let's say if they would spread it.

55:22 So you're saying that, in general, they're not the big spreaders, right?

55:27 But let's say if they do spread, what percentage they are, what wants they had at the ready?

55:34 Is there a possibility that they should still spread it, or they're immune?

55:38 So thank you for that question.

55:39 What you're asking is the natural immunity question.

55:42 And again, I've given you many references for that, and that's that you can see yourself.

55:47 But the answer is that these children, once they are infected with what's typically a very brief nonclinical infection, it doesn't put them in the hospital.

55:56 They recover very quickly unless they're sick children.

56:00 Then they acquire natural immunity, which is much longer lasting, provides up to 20-fold greater protection than the vaccine does.

56:10 And they actually are our best hope going forward in terms of reaching herd immunity.

56:17 Is the immunity conferred by natural infection and recovery because it's longer lasting and it's broader?

56:24 So that means if the children will get vaccinated, that means you won't get herd immunity?

56:33 That is my belief.

56:35 This will only be on the Delta or Delta Plus?

56:38 Precisely, and then the other problem that we haven't spoken about that the Israeli data, unfortunately, has taught all of us is that the protection to the extent that there is protection is very short lived.

56:51 So then we have to revaccinate and revaccinate.

56:54 The problem with revaccinating and revaccinating is a whole other thing, which is that you can induce what's called high zone tolerance.

57:02 You can actually tolerise against the antigen by repeatedly vaccinating like this.

57:08 So you can actually make things worse.

57:10 This is why we can't just rely on politicians and authority figures saying, oh, we don't have the data, but you should go ahead and take another jab.

57:21 That is really important.

57:23 That requires that we have data showing safety because there's a good chance.

57:29 And any of you who have children that have allergies, that have had to take allergy shots, that's a good example of inducing tolerance against an antigen.

57:39 That's how that works.

57:41 And this is why we shouldn't repeatedly vaccinate.

57:43 In addition, each time we administer the vaccine, we're administering risk to the child or the parent.

57:52 And it doesn't go away just because they didn't have a bad adverse event like I did after two vaccinations doesn't mean they're not going to have it after three vaccinations.

58:01 It's a roll of the dice each time.

58:04 So with this policy, we have short term activity of the vaccines.

58:10 Then we have to have revaccination each time we have another risk of incurring damage to children or to the adults that accept the vaccine.

58:21 If when we have the, like, say, a vaccine escape or immunoscape, will other medicines work?

58:29 So that seems and if you look, if you listen carefully to the messaging coming even from Dr. Fauci, he's saying and from Pfizer, Pfizer is saying this directly.

58:43 The only way we're going to get out of this is with medicines now.

58:48 We cannot vaccinate our way out of this pandemic.

58:51 And the problem is that the medicines that are newly being developed that will be very expensive so far don't work very good.

59:00 But these approaches of anti-inflammatory agents seem to have significant benefits as observed by physicians that are actually practicing and including Dr. Zelenko.

59:13 Are there going to be additional agents? Hopefully over time, but we cannot vaccinate our way out.

59:20 One of the good news is is that we have these antibody cocktails that are licensed, are able to be administered early after infection.

59:30 But I just come back from the state of Hawaii where I did an intervention.

59:37 This was not a vacation. And I learned there that in Hawaii, they now have over 5% of the population are infected with Delta Plus.

59:50 Delta Plus is moving through that island nation.

59:53 And as a consequence, the federal government has now determined that it will no longer allow shipment of one of the two antibody cocktails into Hawaii because the virus has already escaped.

1:00:05 The ability of one of those two cocktails to control the virus.

1:00:09 So we're now down to just the Regeneron cocktail that has activity against Delta Plus.

1:00:14 So that's another specific example of the virus evolving to escape.

1:00:19 The problem with these antivirals like Pfizer is developing and Merck is developing that are both either chain terminators like AZT or protease inhibitors.

1:00:32 Is that a single drug that is an antiviral is probably also going to elicit virus escape units in the same way, just as AIDS did.

1:00:43 And so we're in a we're in a box where we're going to have to come.

1:00:46 If we are going to have effective antivirals, we're going to have to have multiple effective antivirals to deploy at the same time.

1:00:53 Otherwise, we're just going to have the same exact problem again.

1:00:57 Have I answered your question? Yeah.

1:00:59 One more question. Just a quick question. You seem to have said that the data in the United States is being suppressed on the one hand.

1:01:09 And you've also said that there's no incentive for the pharmaceutical companies to do the studies.

1:01:18 Perhaps they're disincentive and that's why they're not putting out certain products.

1:01:22 But if there's no incentive for them to do the studies and if we can't trust the data in the United States, can we trust the data?

1:01:29 Are there any countries we can? And how are we going to get how are we supposed to get reliable data?

1:01:34 Is it does it exist? Is it in the works that will now allow us to make decisions in general?

1:01:42 And I've said this now for months, I'm asked by investors these kinds of questions.

1:01:47 Where can we get good data that's going to predict what's going to happen because they're making market decisions for stock investments.

1:01:54 And I've said all along the best data is going to come out of the Netherlands and out of the Scandinavian countries because they have like Sweden, Finland,

1:02:03 because they have excellent public health systems and they are legally allowed to track data on their patients in ways that we aren't.

1:02:11 And the problem with Israel is it's we had the CDC and many of us had hoped that the Israeli data would be rigorous and accurate.

1:02:23 And we now are hearing again and again reports of data manipulation, data that's being deleted and structural disincentives in the Pfizer contract that make it difficult for the Israeli government to be fully transparent about the data.

1:02:42 So that's that's a problem of, as you know, what's trans by my heart goes out to the people of Israel and and what they've been subjected to and what they're experiencing right now.

1:02:55 They truly are a testing laboratory for Pfizer to be blunt.

1:02:59 And it's it's an unfortunate situation.

1:03:04 Many people believe that the data from Iceland is the best right now.

1:03:08 And answer your question. Thank you for your time.

1:03:14 I hope that was helpful. I did my best.

1:03:19 Thank you very much. Thank you so much.

1:03:25 That was Dr. Robert Malone and his information will be provided as well as the references for everything he spoke about today.

0:02 I like the pleasure of introducing someone who is willing to hitch a ride on a plane from a friend of his to make sure he can come here from Cleveland when he heard we were convening.

0:13 And he said that that the Jewish people were God's chosen people and he wanted to do everything to preserve because that was his goal was to help us.

0:25 And he said, I'm going to come matter how I get there. So thanks for coming here and thanks for doing what you're doing.

0:32 And so we're going to go from the scientific side and we're going to go to the legal side and then they're going to come back after that discuss discuss more of the data out there.

0:40 But attorney Thomas Renz is basically came basically a humble servant of Hashem, got an attorney who is basically working exclusively on issues since Covid-19 began in response to the disease and the vaccine since March of 2020.

1:00 He's on the forefront of a passionately a passionately fighting for the safety of the American people, making sure that the complete and true information is shared.

1:10 So the public can make proper decisions for their families, for their children and for their communities.

1:17 Thomas has also shared with us his views today with great honor to address the rabbinical court in hopes of contributing to the safety of the Jewish people.

1:35 So thank you very much. And and it is truly an honor. I want to I want to open up in a very unconventional way.

1:51 I'd like to open up with an unconventional statement. This is a personal statement.

1:57 To me, I'm addressing a court of God's chosen people. I would view it as as the most egregious of lies.

2:08 If I wasn't truthful in what I'm saying, I want you to know that everything that I will say to this court, I believe whatever from the bottom of my soul.

2:18 So you've heard from a number of scientists. These are brilliant people.

2:24 They have answers. They have science. I'm looking at this and I'm coming at this from a different angle.

2:29 I'm coming at this from someone who, first of all, up till approximately two years ago, had you told me that there were vaccines that were going to be dangerous and killing people,

2:42 I would have said that, well, there's something wrong with you.

2:45 My family, with the exception of the covid vaccination, is fully vaccinated. I myself, with the exception of the covid vaccination, am fully vaccinated.

2:56 And when I started my work into covid, it was actually because I was against the lockdowns.

3:06 I was against I felt that it was a violation of our constitutional rights and I was concerned about what it was going to do through that work.

3:14 I spent a substantial amount of time studying the disease. I've continued doing that and then had to move into studying the vaccine, which was kind of an evolution of my work.

3:29 There's there's I'm going to present you with questions that I think should be answered and I'm going to present you with the information that I have.

3:37 I can't answer all these questions fully because the information suppressed. It's hidden. And I'm firmly of the belief that it's being hidden intentionally.

3:47 Whereas a good doctor was much was very measured in his willingness to assign, for lack of a better word, corruption.

3:57 I'm not. I believe that what's happening is is corrupt. I believe it's abhorrent and I think that what's happened in Israel is a tragedy and I want to prevent it from getting to that point here.

4:13 To that extent, I found evidence of cover up from the beginning. Going way back to March of 2020, one of the first areas I found issue was in relation to death counts.

4:27 In 2003, a guidebook for determining the cause of death was issued is the last revision to the coroner's handbook.

4:35 The coroner's handbook is the instruction manual for determining what what would cause someone's death.

4:42 Well, that book hasn't been revised since 2003, with one exception.

4:48 And I believe May, if I'm not mixing up the date, it's been a while since I've looked at this of 2020, the DHHS put out a memo, which was actually a substantive rule change, but they just called it a memo that said we're going to change the way that we count deaths for anything that could be called COVID-19.

5:08 And I'm paraphrasing, but essentially what they did was they said, if you have something that could possibly be considered COVID-19, it needs to be considered COVID-19.

5:21 And perhaps you'll remember early on there were reports of people who died in motorcycle racks, things like that, they were called COVID deaths.

5:30 Well, that's the result of this memo and legally that was acceptable because if you died with COVID, not from COVID, you would be called a COVID death.

5:39 Every other cause of death out there was from, not with, but they changed in the one circumstance.

5:49 The result, I believe, and we're eager to get to discovery on this, although the other side of the federal government and the state governments have fought very hard to prevent us getting discovery on this, but we firmly believe and have a fair bit of evidence that would suggest that the result has been that the death count of this disease has been highly overinflated.

6:09 We also know the case count has been overinflated. Dr. Malone, Dr. McCullough, all these people could explain to you probably far better than I can, but essentially we know that a PCR test cannot diagnose disease.

6:22 It can detect the presence of fragments of a virus, but not the actual presence of disease, yet PCR tests were used in a drive-through format to demonstrate that there is a disease present.

6:35 This is impossible. And we also know that there's been a number of the PCR kits that have been recalled. They've been recalled because they're inaccurate.

6:45 Now, this is a much more recent development, but it's a very important development because the case counts and the death counts, all of this was used to drive the fear.

6:57 While I was listening to Dr. Malone, I did this just to demonstrate. I ran a Google search on public health and fear, and this is Google Scholar, and what you'll see is if you do that, there are a huge number of documents out there that are related, scientifically related,

7:25 to the use of fear as a tactic in public health. I learned this early on. It led to my belief that this was a coverup and that there were issues as a basis of my litigation.

7:39 As we moved on, the coverup related and the fear that's driven the reaction to COVID-19 has evolved and really been translated into a push to force vaccination.

7:53 Now, I would argue that forced vaccination is egregiously illegal in the United States, and particularly in an emergency use authorized vaccine, I can point to a number of laws that say that outright, yet it seems to be being forced.

8:12 Now, the president and his administration know that he can't force it outright. Otherwise, trust me, there would be a federal vaccine mandate, but instead, because he can't force it outright, what he's done is he's tried to force private entities and other such businesses to force this.

8:32 My question is, is why? If this is a safe and effective vaccine, why would you need to force anyone to do it? Wouldn't, over time, wouldn't we become aware of the safety and efficacy and wouldn't it just become something that people do?

8:49 Instead, what's happened is as time goes on...

8:53 Sure. I'll get there.

9:04 We got to use our common sense. Somebody asked before we get data from. Who asked before we get? I made my own database from people that I know. On a daily basis, I crossed paths to hundreds of people. And I made my own notebook, took data, but that is horrible, it's happened.

9:21 It is. It is. And I'll go over some. In the past week, I could tell you personal stories of people that I've spoken to that haven't damaged.

9:33 And I'll give you data here. We'll go over some specific data.

9:44 We have things for them to have a copy to give to the community that I can leave with me or you can email to them.

9:51 Yeah. So and I'm going to recommend on my website. So what I've done is I've been censored very heavily because of that.

10:00 What I've done is I've used my website as a means of communication.

10:04 So I've posted presentations, discussions, and documents on my website, which is renz-law.com. And anything that I'm talking about, you can find there.

10:16 Also, when I file suit, my suits are very, very, very heavily cited. Part of my challenge in life is translating from doctor to English.

10:28 Some of these doctors, when they speak, they're so brilliant that very few people understand them. And one of the one of the roles that I've taken is to translate to English.

10:38 Are we live? Are we ready, Eric? We're off the record. In that case, I was going to ask you later. We've heard from the doctors and the scientists, and you've said yourself that you've been censored.

11:01 But there's been tremendous pressure on the suppressed data, to change data, to not disallow treatment to see what they would like to offer.

11:12 Do we expect that there will be similar pressure on the judicial system, the judges and the system that will prevent a fear and equitable judgment that we have to come to respect?

11:26 How far off the record am I? Well, I'll tell you that it's my opinion that there's an immense amount of pressure.

11:34 Now, I'm ethically barred from suggesting that anything other than justice will be served, but I will tell you that there is an immense amount of pressure.

11:42 I've witnessed certain things. One of the things that I can point to that's very peculiar is having to wait six months or more for a ruling on a simple 12(b) motion in cases where the next step is discovery.

11:59 Cases thrown out, there's no sensible reason for them to be thrown out. I mean, they're very strong cases. There's a lot of pressure on the judiciary, a lot.

12:15 Wasn't your Supreme Court challenge the other day that was negative for us?

12:23 Well, I mean, we had the big win from New York here, and I believe the Jewish community here was involved in the Archdiocese case.

12:37 And that case was tremendous, and one of the great values to that case, and one of the great values to me being here, was that they very strongly upheld the religious freedoms.

12:50 They said, you know, we can't shut it, and the Supreme Court made a number of statements in that case regarding their support for the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

13:02 That's critical, because I expect that we can, from that, we can deduce that the Court's going to continue to support religious freedom, which if that's the case, then I expect that these cases you're seeing about people requesting religious exemptions will turn out in our favor.

13:19 So that case, that's followed, but I was involved a little bit, and it's true that the Court said you can't prevent the following religious exemptions.

13:31 However, the President that took place a few years ago, that what the religious exceptions ruled on, and that he can rule, it was ruled, that public health trumps the protection of religious freedom, which is a determination of religious exceptions.

13:51 So he said, you can file it. It doesn't stop them from preventing the protection of religious freedoms because of public health.

13:59 That second step, we haven't seen any result of it.

14:02 Well, we'll see where it goes.

14:05 Okay, okay.

14:11 So we've seen a number of things that appear to, and I'm sorry, I've lost my position, so I'm starting kind of in a different spot, but we've seen a lot of things that indicate cover-up, right?

14:23 One of the things that I've worked very hard to do is to find data and find things that are evidentiary in nature, right?

14:31 If you can bring up on the -- well, we'll bring up shortly.

14:38 With regards to the vaccine specifically, one of the things that we did is I've got some whistleblowers that have come forward who have gotten access to real data.

14:50 And also, we found some other things.

14:54 And what I'd like to do is I'd like to start out with a document that we made public that was from the Department of Defense.

15:05 It wasn't a confidential document.

15:12 It wasn't something that was -- it was hidden in plain sight, which is frequently something that happens.

15:18 And this is the document.

15:20 So if you see on the screen, you'll see in the bottom left, that's the Department of Defense SEAL.

15:27 Okay, this was -- they are involved with the creation of this document.

15:31 You'll also see the symbol JAIC.

15:34 That's the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center.

15:37 Umetrix is a platform that puts together health information on this stuff and Project Salus's analysis.

15:46 Now, this is really important.

15:48 I was fact-checked on some of the whistleblower data and some of this stuff.

15:52 And I want to clarify that we were correct and that, frankly, the media is lying.

15:59 I don't know how else to say it.

16:01 So we see the Department of Defense document, right?

16:05 And this is a little out of order because we had to pull it off the web and then we put it on my website.

16:11 But if you scroll down to this page, you'll see something that's very critical.

16:18 You'll see the CMS 100+M weekly Medicare records and the CDC SVI data.

16:25 Okay, so in October of 2020, there was a presentation by the FDA that was leaked.

16:34 And everybody heard about the side effects from this vaccine.

16:39 It ran all over the Internet because they said, "We're looking for these side effects in this vaccine."

16:46 But there's a lot more to that presentation.

16:49 And one of the critical things about it was they said in that presentation that they were going to use the CMS,

16:54 which is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services,

16:58 they were going to use their database to monitor for safety and efficacy of the vaccine.

17:05 But the JAIC, artificial intelligence center, presumably --

17:10 and we obviously are not getting answers from the FDA or anybody else on this --

17:15 but is being used to analyze this CMS data.

17:21 If we go back, you'll also see weekly update.

17:25 So my assumption is that the federal government's given data on a weekly basis

17:30 and that they know the stuff that I'm telling you.

17:34 They're just hiding it.

17:36 Now, I'll get to why in a minute.

17:39 I'm certain that money has a bit to do with it.

17:43 But if you go through this, you see the CMS is one of the inputs to this.

17:48 And it comes out, you know, they analyze this.

17:51 And CMS, what you're looking at when you look at CMS data is you're looking at the bills, right?

17:58 Medicare pays the bills.

18:00 So the hospital says, "We did this, this, and this.

18:03 Here's the bill, and Medicare pays it."

18:05 So despite the fact that they're saying these vaccines are free, they're not.

18:08 Someone's paying for them.

18:10 It's through our tax dollars.

18:12 Well, so what we did is we did some analysis on that, and I'll get to that in a minute.

18:18 But before I do, I'm going to go through the Department of Defense's analysis.

18:22 There's a number of things that come out of this, and I'm going to go real quickly through this.

18:26 And if we have questions, I can go back.

18:29 If we scroll down, you see that -- where is this?

18:38 Case definition.

18:41 Oh, this COVID-19 breakthrough infection definition, the second one.

18:46 More than two weeks after the second dose of Pfizer and Moderna, or two weeks after the first dose of Janssen.

18:56 I want you to remember that.

19:00 You're not considered vaccinated until you are fully vaccinated, and now they're looking at changing the definition again to include a booster.

19:10 So this is numbers related to how many people are vaccinated in the Medicare population.

19:20 Now, this is -- well, within the population examined here, and we don't know with Medicare, Medicaid, and they also have the CDC data, which I don't have access to.

19:33 I haven't got a whistleblower on that yet, although I'm looking.

19:37 If we go through here, I want to point out this.

19:41 Over here, 80% of the population, 65+, is vaccinated.

19:50 71% of new cases occurred in fully vaccinated people.

19:54 71%, that doesn't sound like efficacy to me.

19:59 We scroll down, and a lot of this is about the waning effects of the vaccine.

20:03 The farther out you are from getting the vaccine, the less effective it is.

20:07 We all know that, and this whole presentation backs that up.

20:12 If we scroll down farther, we see this document, and here we see the same thing.

20:21 We start out with hospitalizations doubling as Delta variant became the primary source of infection.

20:37 We also see 60% of hospitalizations that occurred were in fully vaccinated individuals.

20:45 Now, they said that this is a crisis of unvaccinated.

20:49 They said that it's only unvaccinated that are in the hospital.

20:53 But we see by the DOD's own presentation that a full 71% of new cases are occurring in the fully vaccinated,

21:01 and over 60% of the hospitalizations are occurring in the fully vaccinated.

21:06 This is absolute proof using their words that they're lying.

21:11 I don't know what else it could be.

21:13 And I hate using such strong statements, but it's got the DOD stamp on it.

21:20 We know that the DOD has this.

21:23 I'm going to scroll down quickly to this page, which has the same two numbers, the 71% and the 60%.

21:32 But then I'm going to look down here.

21:35 It says graphic adapted from CDC presentation July 30th.

21:41 Now, wait a second.

21:43 I may not be a doctor, but I'm fairly certain the CDC has been telling us that this is safe and effective,

21:49 and this is telling me from the Department of Defense document that they were aware that 71% of cases were breakthrough

21:58 and 60% of hospitalizations are breakthrough.

22:02 We're being lied to, gentlemen.

22:04 I don't know how else to say it.

22:05 I would love to candy coat this.

22:07 I'd love to put it another direction.

22:09 This is, to me, irrefutable proof of a lie.

22:14 I don't know what else it could be.

22:17 There's two other key things that I want to point out in this Department of Defense document.

22:23 The first is that they do specify that natural immunity is the strongest, the best method for preventing breakthroughs, preventing anything.

22:38 Even if you are vaccinated, those with natural immunity are still better.

22:42 Although I will tell you, and I'll leave this to the doctors to discuss,

22:46 there's strong evidence that your natural immunity is diminished substantially if you get the vaccine.

22:52 The other thing I want to point out is this last page.

22:56 So this document was taken down from the metrics website after we published it and made it public.

23:04 Before it was taken down, they modified it to add another bullet point over here.

23:10 But if you see in here, North American natives, Hispanics, and blacks,

23:19 which I find interesting that they didn't use African-American as a terminology,

23:23 but those three racial groups all have a higher breakthrough rate.

23:31 There's no explanation for this.

23:33 I've asked a few doctors, and I want to differentiate between something I can prove and something that I'm working on.

23:43 I'm working on getting to the bottom of that.

23:45 From what I'm hearing, there's a higher concentration of ACE2 receptors in non-whites,

23:51 and ACE2 receptors are one of the mechanisms by which the virus and the spike proteins do damage to your cells.

24:00 I just want to say one thing. It's very clear that people with dark complexions don't absorb vitamin D very well,

24:08 and it's a big, big factor.

24:11 Everybody should be supplementing, especially in the winter, but darker skin, they're right off,

24:19 because they come from areas in Africa where there's such blazing sun that it's not going to affect them adversely.

24:27 But if they're up in the north in Scandinavia or in New York, they have to be taken by them.

24:33 Well, and to that extent, something that I won't have time to get into today,

24:38 but that I hope you'll look into as a council, or as a court, is what's occurring in terms of treatment in the hospitals.

24:47 We have evidence of massive neglect, further evidence of cover-up, evidence of just atrocities.

24:53 I don't know how else to say it.

24:56 But these are things that, at best or at minimum, we need to pray over.

25:04 So this document is very, very -- it's very difficult for them to argue with.

25:12 I mean, it is -- I want to -- I can't reiterate enough.

25:15 I mean, we have, you know, a DOD stamp on this, and we have the Joint Artificial Intelligence --

25:23 it's really difficult to suggest that this isn't a good document.

25:28 I want to pull and show you another document.

25:31 And this is -- these are on my website, so you're welcome to put these.

25:40 Now, this one I hope you'll be able to see.

25:43 And I did a presentation regarding some of the information that we got from the whistleblowers.

25:52 And again, this is the follow-up to that presentation.

25:57 In that presentation, my whistleblowers had access to the Center for Medicare Services Computers,

26:06 which, as I said, is the document that the government claims it's looking at for safety and efficacy.

26:14 Well, we ran searches on that, and I said, you know, these are bills.

26:20 So what we did was we ran searches of these bills, okay?

26:26 I want to remind you, the Department of Defense, they're analyzing the same data.

26:32 So they should -- they're presumably running these same searches.

26:36 If they're not, they ought to be.

26:38 And we asked the question, if we've got this, if we're able to pull it, where's Fauci at on this?

26:45 Why isn't he looking at this?

26:47 Why isn't he asking these questions?

26:49 Because one of the responses when DHHS was asked about this was, no such data exists.

26:58 Well, first of all, I don't believe that.

27:01 And second of all, that would be the most egregiously negligent behavior I've ever heard of.

27:07 If you're not looking at this, there's something wrong.

27:11 So we reposted in this presentation those slides that show that this data most certainly does exist.

27:22 Now, Medicare covers 18.1 percent of the U.S. population, okay?

27:27 And we only have access through our whistleblowers to Medicare.

27:31 So that's a small portion, and mind you, it's generally 65 and up.

27:36 So it's the more at-risk population.

27:42 We ran a search, and we searched the bills.

27:47 We said, okay, what days did you get vaccinated, and how many people died within 14 days of getting that shot?

27:55 Now, I want to be transparent here.

27:57 I don't want to be accused of being misleading.

28:00 This is a 65-plus category.

28:03 It's very possible that some of these people died of natural causes.

28:07 Here's the problem.

28:09 Forty-eight thousand of them died within 14 days of the jab.

28:14 And yet Fauci and Kru are telling us that they're not looking into this.

28:18 They're telling it's safe and effective.

28:21 Now, that number by itself is shocking.

28:25 But that number in conjunction with the VAERS data and everything else we're seeing is terrifying.

28:31 And that number in conjunction with other data I'm going to show you is even worse.

28:35 So we found 48,000 almost, a little under, 48,000 deaths within 14 days.

28:41 Now, we didn't differentiate between one shot, two shots.

28:45 We also didn't wait the 14 days.

28:48 Now, here's the thing that's really egregious about this.

28:51 If you recall in that DOD document, I asked you to remember that until 14 days post-full vaccination,

28:59 you're not considered vaccinated.

29:02 None of these 48,000 are presumably counted as deaths from the vaccine because of that little statistical game they're playing.

29:12 And if they switch this, if they change this, if they say, listen, now you have to have the booster shot too,

29:19 are they going to disregard all of the side effects?

29:23 I mean, they're not reporting what's happening now.

29:26 So, you know, what's going to happen there?

29:31 These next two slides after this are from that FDA presentation that I mentioned was leaked from October of 2020.

29:40 This is the slide that says in red at the bottom we highlighted that they're using CMS data, okay?

29:50 This is the next slide from that presentation, and these are the side effects that the FDA said it was going to look for.

29:57 Now, they said they're monitoring this real time.

30:00 I showed you a DOD document that says weekly report on it.

30:05 Sounds like real time.

30:08 Yet they seem to tell me that they can't find any side effects or adverse events.

30:13 Well, here's what we did.

30:16 This is the state of New York, okay?

30:21 These people in this did not have these side effects.

30:29 We ran a search for the CMS data for the bills.

30:33 We looked in the bills.

30:34 How many people were diagnosed with anaphylaxis, Bell's policy, et cetera, et cetera?

30:39 We excluded anyone to tighten our search zone, we excluded anyone who had had any of these symptoms prior to January 1, 2020.

30:53 So it's at least a year before.

30:55 So it's not people who were paralyzed and were still paralyzed.

30:59 It's people who within 28 days, only 28 days, so basically within one month or less of the vaccination,

31:07 they found themselves victims of these side effects, right?

31:11 These are the side effects that the FDA said they were going to search for.

31:16 Now, you'll see in New York, you'll see over here, 6,586 deaths within 28 days.

31:23 Obviously, you didn't have a death as a side effect prior, but 6,586 people died from the safe and effective vaccine.

31:32 And remember, Medicare only, so this is only in the Medicare population.

31:39 Now, when I look at these, a couple things really stick out to me, and they're down here.

31:45 Because I've never heard of someone quick developing a case of paralysis or seizure convulsion disorder.

31:51 I mean, you don't get seizures unless something happens in your health.

31:55 There's going to be a change.

31:56 If you're a healthy person that doesn't have seizures, you don't wake up one day with seizures.

32:00 And if you're a healthy person that's doing things, you don't wake up paralyzed one day.

32:04 But the safe and effective vaccine in New York resulted in 1,017 people who had started having seizures and convulsions,

32:13 and 1,316 people who were paralyzed.

32:18 If you go down through this presentation, I broke it down for a number of states, but it's the same --

32:24 What about the stroke? How many strokes?

32:27 In New York, we had 2,135.

32:30 But remember, we also have broken out separately thrombocytopenia thrombosis.

32:36 So some of the other clotting diseases are broken out separately.

32:40 And the clotting really seems to be one of the major, major issues with this.

32:45 That seems to really be foundational.

32:48 Again, I'm not a doctor, so I can't go into the specifics of it.

32:52 But I've looked at enough of these numbers to see that there's a real issue.

32:56 I mean, we see embolisms, lots of heart attacks, infarction, myocardial infarctions, things like that.

33:03 So, I mean, we're seeing a lot of things related to that clotting issue.

33:11 So --

33:12 How many people were vaccinated compared to these results?

33:16 Well, I do have those numbers.

33:19 I don't have them with me.

33:21 It is.

33:22 It is.

33:23 And I don't have them with me.

33:25 So what happens when we get this data is frequently we get this in a huge dump of raw data.

33:32 And so we have to kind of go through and put it together and make it something that people can use.

33:38 So it sometimes takes time.

33:41 And it sometimes takes substantial time.

33:43 So we're getting -- we have more data.

33:46 There's going to be a tremendous amount more coming out.

33:49 We just don't have it all analyzed yet.

33:51 And we're working to continue to get more.

33:55 In full disclosure, we are going to -- I believe that we have this in pretty strong evidentiary format now.

34:03 We're going to actually be taking steps to strengthen it to make sure that they can't challenge us when we submit this in court,

34:09 which naturally we'll be doing.

34:11 But any time you have a whistleblower, you have to balance protecting the whistleblower with, you know, being able to limit the ability of the other side to challenge your chain of custody on the evidence.

34:27 I'll tell you that this data has been evaluated.

34:30 And there's several very, very well placed people who are far smarter than I am that have looked at the data that know who the whistleblower is.

34:40 And that have attested to this.

34:44 And we have actually submitted some of this data in federal court already.

34:48 So I've done my due diligence.

34:50 I will stand behind this data.

34:53 And if I were to submit it to court without being able to stand behind it, I could lose my license.

34:58 So when I say this data is good, I firmly believe it's good.

35:01 And as I said even more importantly than that, as I said when I started this, I don't think that I could do much worse than lying to this council.

35:09 So I can assure you I'm standing behind what I have to say.

35:14 >> One more thing.

35:15 How does this compare with the VAERS database?

35:18 >> So VAERS has actually been held in court to be unreliable.

35:24 And it's been -- and the reason for that is it's self-reporting.

35:28 Now the doctors are supposed to report this, but they're not.

35:31 I have more people that have testified that they're not reporting and that they're covering up this stuff than I could possibly list.

35:40 I mean, it's not hard to find whistleblowers on that.

35:43 Find anyone who works in a hospital that's aware of what's going on.

35:46 They'll tell you they're not supposed to report it.

35:52 The VAERS system has historically been determined through the Harvard Pilgrim study that to be between 1 and 10% of the injuries are reported.

36:02 So you can take it and multiply it between 100 and 10, 10 and 100.

36:07 So I mean, it's way underreported.

36:09 You know, I would -- I'd be willing to eat my hat if it wasn't -- if there weren't 200,000 deaths in the U.S. from this.

36:18 I'm quite confident that that number's probably low, but we're probably at least there.

36:26 Here's the real issue, right?

36:28 So when I was asked to come over and to speak with you, you know, one of the issues that was brought up to me is kids.

36:38 Okay.

36:39 So I'm a dad.

36:40 I have an 8-year-old and an 11-year-old.

36:42 And I'll tell you that there is literally nothing on this planet that will get me to give this to my children.

36:48 I've worked around the clock on this exclusively for all -- approaching two years now.

36:55 As a non-doctor, I think I've read about every single thing that you can read.

37:01 I've read more medical journals than I'd ever cared to, more law, more anything.

37:07 And like I said, my job has been to translate this stuff from medical to English.

37:12 And with the help of a lot of brilliant people like Dr. McCullough, you know, I'd like to think we've done an okay job of that.

37:21 This -- this isn't safe.

37:24 Our side effects show that.

37:26 It's not effective.

37:27 Their document shows that.

37:29 And by the way, I don't know if you all caught this, but Wolinski from CDC,

37:36 shortly after -- in fact, the next week after we dropped that DOD document and we really started blowing that up,

37:42 she came out and said that the vaccines can no longer prevent the spread of COVID-19.

37:49 Why are we having this discussion?

37:51 Why is anybody getting this?

37:53 Why would you be experimented on?

37:55 We confirmed through Medicare -- whistleblower sent me some data.

38:00 This isn't public until now.

38:02 Well, you guys will be the first.

38:04 We confirmed that there is no commonality in the United States that has been paid for not a single dose from Medicare.

38:12 It's not licensed.

38:13 When you get the Pfizer shot, it's not licensed.

38:16 And as Dr. Malone said, the fact that it's legally distinct is really important because being legally distinct means that it's a distinct product.

38:24 And since they're not telling us what's in it, who knows what the difference is.

38:34 This is an incredible situation, right?

38:37 This is an incredible situation.

38:40 Why would we allow an experimental jab to be put into our children?

38:48 There's no long-term studies.

38:50 It hasn't been long enough for there to be a long-term study.

38:54 Typically, you're looking 10 to 15 years.

38:58 We have no idea what this is going to do in two years.

39:01 What I do know is having talked to a majority of the doctors working on this in the country, that they're very scared about the two- to five-year range.

39:11 We're seeing numerous things happening already.

39:14 They're quite nervous about this fall.

39:18 What's going to happen because what we're seeing in the numbers, and I'm working on getting these confirmed,

39:25 but the same thing that we've seen with Israel, the highest vaccination rate has the highest COVID rate.

39:32 Everything we're seeing points to this being a disaster, yet we keep pushing full steam ahead.

39:38 Why?

39:39 Why?

39:40 Well, let's look at the relationship between the Department of Health and Human Services and the pharmaceutical industry.

39:48 Billions of dollars a year.

39:51 These guys have a revolving door.

39:53 I'm not going to get into all the details, but you see people go from DHHS to Pfizer to Moderna and back.

40:00 I mean, it's a revolving door where you work, right?

40:04 In the '90s, we passed something called the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, PDUFA for short.

40:10 Basically, what that does is allows pharmaceuticals to give user fees to expedite their drugs being approved.

40:22 Well, those user fees are pretty hefty.

40:25 Now, I'm not suggesting that those user fees, which are many, many, many millions of dollars, would have anything to do with this,

40:34 but, you know, I'll let you guys draw your own conclusions.

40:39 Moderna.

40:41 Do you know how many approved drugs Moderna has on the market?

40:45 Zero.

40:47 Do you know the value of Moderna?

40:49 Last I looked, it was 25 billion.

40:52 Now, how is that?

40:55 The only thing that they've got on the market is this vaccine.

40:59 By the way, NIH, you know, where Fauci works, co-owns the intellectual property rights on that vaccine.

41:08 I'm not saying there's anything shady going on, but I'll let you draw your own conclusions.

41:13 These are questions that we should be asking, right?

41:16 These are questions.

41:19 And whether we go back to the very beginning where, you know, I talked about the death counts being changed from one disease, PCR tests that don't work,

41:34 lies about the safety and the efficacy.

41:37 I mean, what I've done here is over the last however long I've been talking, I've laid out a whole slew of things that you'd be hard-pressed to call anything but a lie.

41:47 Now they want you to trust your children with this.

41:51 There is literally no chance of my child ever getting this injection.

41:56 None.

41:57 I'd leave the country.

41:58 I would do whatever I had to do first.

42:00 It's not going to happen because I love my kids and I know what's going on.

42:05 I pity the people who do not know what's going on.

42:08 The cover-up is abhorrent.

42:10 By the way, just in case you're curious, there is -- it's called the trusted news initiative.

42:17 The trusted news initiative is basically a whole slew of media sites, most of your mainstream news media that's come together and said that they're going to combat vaccine misinformation.

42:30 You'll note that some of the big tech players are in it and some of these other -- all the big media's in it.

42:39 Combatting vaccine misinformation means that they're lying and covering up because we know that the people that own big media also own big tech, big pharma, big everything else.

42:55 It's a very, very, very shady thing that's occurring.

42:59 It's a war on the people of the world by a few that have too much power.

43:07 I don't need to tell this council what happens when too much power is given to one man who doesn't have good intentions.

43:16 And I pray that we remember that.

43:18 And I pray for the people of Israel.

43:20 I pray for the people of America.

43:22 And I pray that this council will find the wisdom to do what God wants you to do.

43:28 Amen.

43:30 Thank you very much.

43:32 Thank you.

43:33 There is a religious point by a Jewish law.

43:38 If the doctor is not responsible, he shouldn't take whatever he has to give to you.

43:48 Who's responsible when someone gets damaged?

43:53 That is a wonderful question.

43:55 And I'm so glad.

43:56 I wish I would have thought to bring that up.

43:58 Nobody.

44:00 There are so many laws indemnifying these people and barring us going after them.

44:09 It has been a great, great challenge.

44:12 Do you know that if I sue Anthony Fauci for lying, which I feel very strongly I could prove,

44:20 that I could potentially be on the hook for his legal fees personally?

44:26 If we had the sort of protections from torts for the general public that the federal government has given itself

44:39 and the pharmaceutical companies, no one would ever sue anyone again.

44:45 It is nearly impossible to sue an individual for damages on this.

44:52 They passed so many laws to do this.

44:54 I'm not saying it's impossible.

44:56 And I assure you, I'll bring cases because I'm just that way.

45:00 But it is a very difficult road to tread.

45:04 And I will tell you that the people who are sick and injured from this,

45:07 and who will become sick and injured from this, they're going to have a great deal of difficulty.

45:13 Will the schools be?

45:26 Probably not.

45:28 They will probably not be responsible.

45:30 There's a possibility.

45:32 We're going to go after it.

45:34 But we don't really know where the court's going to come down on some of these questions yet.

45:40 In all honesty, it's my sincere hope that the people will rise up and demand change,

45:47 that by doing things like this, that the truth will come out and come out to the public broadly,

45:53 and that the people will take a stand because the courts are going to take time.

45:58 But we saw early in litigation, and this is my opinion,

46:03 a lot of the early litigation started with the lockdowns,

46:06 and there were a lot of people that said due process is being violated.

46:10 Well, of course due process was being violated.

46:12 When you say you have to stay in your house and you can't leave without any sort of due process,

46:18 that's akin to house arrest.

46:20 Yet we all agreed to do it to flatten the curve.

46:22 Remember, 14 days almost two years ago.

46:26 Well, the courts, there were a lot of suits over that, and the courts basically said,

46:31 "Well, when there's an emergency, we give some leeway to this."

46:37 And it's a very important point because what the courts came down on the side of the Tenth Amendment

46:45 over due process in a lot of cases.

46:48 Now, that's reasonable to an extent, and let me explain this.

46:51 If a tornado comes through my town and there's power lines down,

46:56 I don't want my kids playing in a mud puddle, okay?

47:00 So that's an emergency.

47:02 You tell the kids, "Stay inside, and we'll clean up the power lines,"

47:06 and then you let them back out, and that takes a day or two.

47:09 The definition of emergency doesn't include things that take a year and a half.

47:14 This isn't an emergency.

47:16 And the fact that most of this is being done in emergency use authorization is plainly illegal.

47:21 We're getting to that. We're working on that as attorneys.

47:23 But the bottom line is that a lot of these things have not been decided in the courts,

47:32 and it's hard to say where they're going to go.

47:34 And I think that it's very important when they made those rules on the emergency,

47:38 they did so in part because they were told if they didn't make these decisions,

47:44 millions of people would die.

47:46 They were lied to, but none of the lawyers were asking for facts at that time.

47:56 Yes. Well, he certainly did that.

48:02 Someone mentioned to me that this that you cannot sue on the COVID vaccine is on all vaccines.

48:08 Is that true?

48:10 It's very difficult to sue for vaccine injury for any vaccine.

48:14 You're required to go through, for lack of a better term, a vaccine court.

48:20 So it's not specifically on the COVID vaccine?

48:23 COVID has additional protections.

48:26 So it's worse for COVID.

48:29 Okay.

48:32 Thank you.

48:34 Thank you. It was an honor.

48:35 And if I can be of service in the future, please,

48:38 I hope that you'll get a chance to look into what's happening at the hospitals as well.

48:45 We're very blessed that we have people in the community willing to take care and look out for our community.

48:50 Thank you so much.

48:52 Thank you.

0:03 Again, I'm Dr. Eric Feintuch.

0:05 I'm going to introduce the pleasure of introducing Dr. Jane Ruby, who's a PhD.

0:10 I want to thank Dr. Jane Ruby for giving her time to testify today.

0:15 Dr. Ruby is a medical professional and a pharmaceutical drug development expert

0:20 with over 20 years of experience in regulatory processes for drug approval with the FDA and EMA.

0:27 Dr. Ruby worked on the human research studies to launch some of the most famous compounds in the world

0:32 for the treatment of depression, Alzheimer's, and cardiac diseases.

0:37 As such, she is eminently qualified to speak on the process that medical products need to go through

0:44 in order to be deemed safe.

0:48 Dr. Ruby has spent the past many months investigating the COVID shot

0:53 and has much information to share.

0:56 She'll be coming in from our contact now through Zoom.

1:06 Okay, Dr. Ruby, can you hear us?

1:15 If you can unmute, we're good.

1:18 Okay, Dr. Ruby, can you hear us?

1:28 All right, one second.

1:43 Dr. Ruby, can you hear us now?

1:48 We can't hear you, unfortunately.

1:53 Just give us a moment.

2:01 Dr. Ruby, can you hear us now?

2:04 I can hear you.

2:07 I could always hear you. It was you now. Thank you to whoever fixed that.

2:23 Okay, thank you. Shalom rabbis and everybody there. I'm Dr. Jane Ruby.

2:28 Thank you for the introduction. I appreciate that.

2:32 You gave my background so you will understand where I'm coming from.

2:36 I want to add to this and I'm honored to come after Thomas Renz

2:40 because I find him to be one of the good guys in this fight.

2:43 He's honest and he's not bought off or compromised

2:48 and everything he said I agree with and I want to add to it.

2:52 But I want to take it back to beginning rabbis.

2:56 This is not a vaccine.

2:59 It's not a vaccine by any definition, anywhere in the world.

3:04 And I'll tell you why. Because a vaccine implies protection.

3:08 It confers immunity in two parts.

3:12 Your body learns to recognize anything that looks like that pathogen

3:15 if it ever sees it again and it trains part of your killer T cells

3:19 to take that out of your body and neutralize it if it ever does occur.

3:24 These injections do neither.

3:27 In fact, what these injections do is the opposite.

3:31 And everything else for populations, this is not for any human being.

3:37 It's not for animals because the animal never made it out of preclinical

3:40 in SARS-CoV-1 because this cavity is dangerous and it's dead.

3:47 Okay. What this does is it is a computer generated chimera molecule.

3:54 chimera means it's like a Frankenstein.

3:56 It's pieces from different cell lines.

3:58 Part of it is an amortisse, same cell line.

4:01 It's been in the genome bank for years, macaque monkeys.

4:04 So you're integrating a computer, a computer-generated molecule.

4:10 That is the reason the lipid nanoparticle, which is the transport,

4:13 gets into every cell in your body, as Dr. Malone indicated,

4:16 is because it's a nanotechnology. It doesn't need to be absorbed.

4:19 It's almost immediately into the blood compartment

4:21 and it gets a lot of different organs.

4:23 And when it does, it does integrate your own DNA.

4:25 And if you don't want to believe me, that's fine.

4:27 Go to their own website.

4:28 They brag out how their mRNA technology in a research genetic code.

4:33 Now, in addition to being a researcher, a former clinician

4:37 who's taking care of patients in the hospital,

4:39 I'm also a Jewish mother and I'm a Jewish grandmother.

4:42 And I'm nervous about the genetic nature of the Jewish people

4:46 because this is an outrage.

4:48 Nothing. No of these shots.

4:50 If there is a result, those air becomes a manufacturing plant

4:54 and I'm making up the number of spike proteins.

4:57 The spike proteins have never before been seen in a human.

5:01 They've never been tested in a human.

5:03 So when Mr. Ress said that, you know, there is a long-term data.

5:07 Ress, there is a real short-term data.

5:11 The institutions have collapsed.

5:13 The SDS at Pfizer.

5:16 The CDC is a patent-holding company.

5:19 You want to talk about conflicts of interest.

5:25 And it's with animal DNA.

5:27 If I can think of a greater affront to a child

5:31 than to modify it, whether it's children, the L,

5:36 my message is if you have taken it, do not take it.

5:38 I don't care if you're 100 years old or 1-year-old.

5:41 If you've taken one, take the other.

5:44 And if you've taken both, for God's sake, please don't take a booster.

5:49 Now, a couple of other words about myocarditis.

5:52 I'm a cardiac nurse practitioner in addition to the rest of my medical career.

5:58 I'm an expert in preventive, surgical, and metapardiology.

6:02 And I'm here to tell you that I've never seen a case of mild myocarditis.

6:08 That's like saying I've seen a case of mild death.

6:10 Now, I know I'm dramatic, but that's the important point of it all.

6:14 Any inflammatory process leaves behind the remnants

6:18 of a very complex cascade of events that creates fibrosis.

6:22 Dampampus heart is an electrochemical conducting organ.

7:07 You can't fight fibrosis or scar up that tissue

7:11 because signals get stuck or they go around year-oldness

7:14 if the person is lucky to live that long.

7:17 I want to show you if it comes up because I have a green screen.

7:23 We found that companies will not -- what company have you ever seen

7:27 that would see this kind of death and not out and do damage control?

7:31 Doesn't it -- I mean, their science should be highly suspicious.

7:35 So we look to other countries like Israel and Canada

7:38 that have heard of governments and that have accomplished great actions.

7:41 And I wonder if you can see it.

7:42 This is the latest data.

7:44 And what it shows -- and this is what I'm afraid of.

7:46 And this is why I'm passionate about the children.

7:48 And side-effect, not just card.

7:50 And go down age group from the '60s to the '50s to the '40s.

7:54 The end goes up.

7:56 Now, this is my guess.

7:57 This is Canada as October 17.

8:03 This is one in 76,000 cases of myocarditis 40-year-old plus.

8:09 If you go down age 25-39, it drops in half to one in 39,000.

8:15 And 18 to 24-year-olds down again in half to one in 14,000.

8:19 And then we see the latest from 12-17.

8:22 Because these age groups are pharmaceutical-developed.

8:25 They're reporting age groups.

8:26 They're very anonymous.

8:28 So the 12-17-year-olds that have been jammed in the last three or four months,

8:32 what I'm seeing is one in 5,200.

8:35 The deadline is what I'm seeing -- if this gets into 5-11-year-olds,

8:41 the younger you go, the more robust your immune system is.

8:45 That's why they're not as often as older adults.

8:47 They have a very good immune system.

8:51 And so we're about to see -- if we all don't work together to stop it,

8:55 we are about to see devastation, death, injury in small, relatively healthy after 5 to 11.

9:01 Because again, they're reporting age groups.

9:04 It's six months to four years.

9:09 Terrible, terrible.

9:11 This is a flu with a statistical recovery rate of 100%.

9:15 And there hasn't been a lot of discussion today on movement.

9:19 And the reason early treatment has been bad and subdued and made illegal in some states

9:24 or governors in the United States have blocked the access through their Department of Health

9:28 and threat doctors and nurse practitioners is because they never legally get away

9:33 with use authorization, they do not batch or say that the other -- the HTQ and the Ivernaut effective.

9:41 There's no secret, okay, lay public.

9:44 As a prescriber, I prescribe something for as long as it's FDA approved.

9:49 I can prescribe something for something other than that which it was approved.

9:52 That's called off-label prescribing.

9:55 It's not illegal.

9:56 What is illegal is for a pharma company to market anything for anything outside its label.

10:02 And that's gotten the slight of hand and the double the approval.

10:05 It's not an approval.

10:06 This is biggest -- it's just the big hoax perpetrate.

10:10 And I was arrested.

10:11 It only was lighting at this point.

10:32 I don't know if you can hear.

11:50 >> Dr. Ruby, we're sorry.

11:51 We had some technical difficulties.

11:52 We're getting back online right now.

12:01 >> The damage to your blood.

12:07 >> Dr. Ruby, you're going to have to come back a little bit.

12:09 What happened was we lost you about three minutes ago.

12:11 You're going to have to start with that story again.

12:13 I'm sorry.

12:14 Go back a little bit to --

12:16 >> Where were we at?

12:17 Sorry.

12:19 >> About the hoax.

12:20 Okay.

12:21 We were talking about --

12:24 >> About it's safe.

12:25 About it being safe.

12:26 And then we got disconnected for about three minutes.

12:28 I'm sorry about that.

12:29 >> This is the biggest hoax.

12:30 >> This is the biggest hoax is where you were --

12:31 >> I just said that, the hoax.

12:33 But I don't think I said too much after that.

12:36 I don't know if anyone's taken notes.

12:38 You know, I don't really prepare a lot of notes because I'm living, eating,

12:41 and sleeping this every single day like many other experts on the front line.

12:46 So I pour it out from my heart.

12:49 I pour it out from what I understand.

12:51 If somebody can just tell me a word or two, what I was -- do you recall?

12:57 I think you've gotten the gist of it if you've gotten everything except the last

13:00 three minutes.

13:01 I just want to tell you that this is the line in the sand, rabbis.

13:06 This is your line in the sand.

13:08 This is irreversible.

13:11 It's highly toxic.

13:13 And the spike proteins which are synthetic and based on a computer-generated model

13:18 never before seen in nature, we have no idea what is to come.

13:24 But if you don't take it and if you spare your children, you will know what is to come.

13:30 And that is at least they will have a shot at a life and they will have a shot at

13:36 continuing the Jewish legacy.

13:38 And I appeal to you for that.

13:40 And I'm happy to answer any questions.

13:41 There's -- I could talk for two hours.

13:43 I know you don't have it.

13:45 You know, we had our FDA briefing yesterday.

13:47 I believe they're voting on it today.

13:50 The Pfizer briefing document is a complete lie.

13:53 It's a circus.

13:55 I want to make one other point.

13:57 I've been in pharmaceutical drug development for 20 years.

13:59 I've launched some of the most famous drugs in the world.

14:02 I've been at the table with -- the FDA has collapsed.

14:08 When I tell you they've collapsed, what I mean is they did not even follow their own

14:12 guidance documents, their own regulations.

14:15 I've developed drugs for 20 years.

14:17 There's a process.

14:19 This process is absent.

14:21 And if you want some proof of it, go to the Pfizer website and download the PDF

14:27 for the Conernati, the branded version that supposedly isn't available, but it's

14:31 interchangeable, or the other one that they're sticking to everyone with.

14:34 And look at the package inserts.

14:36 It's called a prescriber information.

14:38 Every pharma company lives and breathes by that document because that's your

14:42 marketing authorization.

14:44 That's your lifeblood.

14:46 And if you compare that package insert with something that's been, you know,

14:50 genuinely approved years ago by the FDA, you will see a dearth.

14:54 You will just see the absence of important information.

14:58 There's no pharmacokinetics.

15:00 There's no pharmacodynamics.

15:02 There's no safety data on special populations like the elderly, like renal

15:07 failure, like kidney impairment, you know, liver impairment.

15:10 There's none of that.

15:12 There's no dose adjustment because they just rammed it through.

15:17 You've been warned with respect and affection.

15:22 It's a fellow Jew.

15:24 And I implore you, make your children untouchable right now.

15:27 They don't get it.

15:29 They don't spread it.

15:34 And they don't need this.

15:37 Thank you for listening.

15:39 Thank you very much.

15:41 Thank you so much, Dr. Jane Ruby, for coming here.

15:44 And your testimony is very well received.

15:47 And thank you for your effort and your concern.

15:50 And the love of your family, which is obvious, is extended to the whole

15:55 family of the Jewish people.

15:57 Thank you so much.

15:59 My pleasure.

16:00 My pleasure.

16:01 If there are any questions, I'm happy to answer them.

16:03 Jess, you mentioned --

16:05 Microphone.

16:08 You mentioned that I think I heard you say that for the 20 years you were

16:11 involved with production of drugs or of the -- did I get that right?

16:17 Or did she mention that?

16:19 Yes.

16:20 Yes.

16:21 Yes.

16:22 You mentioned that I think I heard you say that for the 20 years you were

16:25 involved with production of drugs or of the -- did I get that right?

16:31 Or did she mention that?

16:33 Yes.

16:34 Yes.

16:35 In the process, yes.

16:36 Okay.

16:37 My question is, in this particular case, I mean, I guess the question is

16:40 all about all vaccines, but this one especially, are the doctors

16:44 administering these -- are they knowledgeable?

16:48 Do they understand what's in it?

16:49 Do they understand how it works?

16:51 Do they understand what the risks and the benefits are?

16:55 Or are they -- in other words, are they knowledgeable?

16:57 My question is, are doctors knowledgeable?

17:00 It's been very frustrating.

17:02 It's an excellent question because it's been very frustrating.

17:05 I've asked hundreds of doctors, some of them off the record.

17:09 I get a similar answer every time.

17:11 The medical doctors in the United States were trained to take the CDC's

17:15 word, but, you know, they can't get off on that anymore.

17:18 If I can figure this out, they can figure it out.

17:20 And then the other reason is they're afraid to lose their license.

17:23 And as Dr. Stella Emanuel, who's one of the frontline doctors from the

17:26 very beginning, has said, you're worried about your license?

17:29 You took an oath to preserve life, not take it, right?

17:32 But I want to give you one other quick insight.

17:34 I know we're limited on time.

17:36 That process I'm talking about, if you as a company make it out of pre-clinical,

17:41 which is animals and petri dishes, okay, with your safety.

17:44 You have enough of a safety, it's okay that they allow you -- the FDA,

17:48 this is how it used to work -- allowed you to go into the four phases

17:52 of human research.

17:53 That's called clinical research, phases one through four.

17:56 We'll leave on four because that's post-marketing surveillance,

17:59 where the companies are obligated to feed back continual safety for years.

18:04 But let's focus on phase one.

18:06 It's like 10 or 15 healthy people.

18:08 They get compensated well because they're the first humans, they're healthy.

18:12 And then you also do your frontal kinetic studies.

18:15 You need to know, how long does the drug stay in the body?

18:18 Where does it accumulate?

18:19 Where -- how does it get eliminated?

18:21 What's the half-life?

18:22 What's the concentration time?

18:25 Et cetera, et cetera.

18:26 None of that appears anywhere.

18:28 And that occurs normally in phase one.

18:31 And you get -- it's your big safety beginning, okay?

18:34 It's more about safety because you have healthy people, it's not about efficacy.

18:38 This is general drug development.

18:39 Phase two, larger number of people, if it's a drug to treat something,

18:44 there are usually people that have very simple, straightforward, no comorbidities,

18:48 and they're being tested for efficacy and safety.

18:51 Then you get to the early phase three, A, you're looking at your pivotal trials,

18:56 right, which you're going to send back to the FDA for consideration for approval.

19:00 Now, the thing about that is that phase three should be done a certain way.

19:04 There's a standard, good clinical practices, good research practices,

19:09 and that is randomized, equally randomized placebo-controlled trial.

19:14 This company admitted on page seven at the top of that package insert

19:18 that they had a group around January or February of $43,000.

19:23 They half of them were getting placebo.

19:25 They broke the blind.

19:26 When they broke the blind, this is why we don't have the right kind of information

19:30 and why the FDA, I feel, illegally approved this because it wasn't the right data, right?

19:36 But what they did was they turned their randomized placebo-controlled trial

19:40 into an open label, because everybody knows what they're getting,

19:43 that's called an open label, observational trial.

19:46 That is not the standard.

19:48 That type of data that you get in is not the standard,

19:51 but they got away with not doing the proper studies.

19:55 You see, and if you look at the Pfizer, the protocol is C459-1001.

20:03 I memorize it because I talk about it all the time.

20:05 The title tells you it's criminal.

20:07 The title starts out a phase one/two/three study.

20:13 You can't do phases one, two, and three simultaneously.

20:16 Why?

20:17 Because each phase directs the design for the second phase,

20:22 for the third, the second one dictates because you take that safety information

20:27 and you infiltrate it, you interweave it so that you can't do them all together.

20:35 To me, it's unethical.

20:37 I think it's criminal, and I think it got us away from the real data

20:41 because, rabbis, if they did it the right way,

20:45 they never would have been able to get this through.

20:48 They never would have been able to get through.

20:49 So I wanted you to understand there is a bonfire process.

20:52 You can look up on the FDA website.

20:54 Look under guidance documents.

20:56 You'll see hundreds of them.

20:58 We even have one on how to design a trial for shedding of viral material and vaccines.

21:05 Interesting, right?

21:06 So thank you for that question.

21:08 It gives me a chance to share that information with you

21:11 on the process of drug development in humans.

21:15 Thank you, Dr. Ruby.

21:16 To follow up on that question, when a based-in has a procedure,

21:22 the based-in has to solicit and has to take testimony from Mumkum, from experts.

21:30 Many times we've encountered in this procedure,

21:34 we've encountered that there are doctors who are in the front line of treating.

21:41 Now, the question over here is whether we take a vaccine or not,

21:44 whether we administer vaccines to particular populations.

21:48 Those questions of medical treatment have traditionally been the province of treating physicians.

21:55 We've heard from a host of scientists and academic professionals.

22:01 Some of them are doctors, some of them are not doctors,

22:03 but they're coming as you just gave us a pretty detailed explanation

22:09 of scientific procedures and scientific acceptance of treatment options.

22:19 But there seems to be a tension between the two.

22:24 So with that background, maybe you could comment on the expertise

22:32 of the average clinical treating physician as opposed to those who are trained in research procedures,

22:42 those who are scientists changed in research, because that seems to be a difficulty here.

22:49 Okay, sure.

22:50 I'm going to defer on the details around the qualifications of physicians.

22:57 Well, I do understand them quite well, but I do defer when I'm not that type of expert.

23:04 In terms of the tension and the disagreement,

23:08 I think practitioners are with patients every single day, which I've had that experience.

23:12 But there's a very different specialty to being, say, any kind of a doctor,

23:18 an MD or a PhD in pharma drug development.

23:21 If you happen to be in pharma drug development, you were previously an MD or a nurse practitioner,

23:26 you actually have, in my opinion, a fuller understanding of all the different sides of things.

23:32 So from my perspective, and just for full disclosure,

23:35 I'm a licensed nurse practitioner, internal medicine, subspecialty, surgical, and medical cardiology.

23:41 I have full prescriptive privileges, including the full federal schedule.

23:45 I have an independent license to practice.

23:48 I took all of my coursework in the medical school

23:50 and at the nursing school at the prestigious University of Rochester.

23:53 Two doctors, two master's degrees, one obviously in nursing, the other in health economics.

23:58 I'm published in health economics predominantly, but I'm on other papers as well.

24:03 But I think that when you have a doctor or a PhD or an MD or a nurse practitioner,

24:08 or both, who is in pharma drug development,

24:11 you're seeing someone who has a very high level of understanding

24:16 and a working knowledge of biochemistry and inorganic,

24:20 I mean, on a daily basis, pharmacokinetics, dynamics, receptor physiology, pathophysiology.

24:26 So I think that we're a lot of medical doctors who are just pure, I say just, with all due respect,

24:33 that are purely practitioners.

24:35 They don't have the insight, understanding of how the sausage is made.

24:39 That's kind of where I come in. I'm a little bit unique in that way.

24:42 And I know I only have two or three other colleagues that have come forward,

24:45 like Dr. Mead and Karen Kingston, that I know of.

24:48 There could be more. But anyway, so there's a whole other world

24:52 in terms of how this is supposed to go.

24:56 So when I see all of these parts missing and skipped over,

25:00 and when I say to you that the FDA has collapsed, I mean it.

25:04 It's gone. You don't have oversight.

25:07 And Dr. Malone made a comment about how there's an obligation for oversight bodies

25:14 to go into these manufacturing plants.

25:17 It wasn't just the Japanese. The Japanese did a FOIA request.

25:21 That's how they got that information.

25:23 But they also got shipments, right?

25:26 I can tell you, I can give you links and contact information

25:30 for literally hundreds of doctors who are scientists, microscopy experts,

25:37 with all their files on what they have found in hundreds of vials now.

25:42 It started out with one vial in Spain with La Quinta, Colombia.

25:45 It is now blossomed to hundreds of vials with verified chain of custody, right?

25:53 That's important. But you're talking, you know, you can't.

25:56 It's not a little contamination. It's an intentional,

26:01 I don't know what the end game is, I'm not going to speculate,

26:03 but I can tell you that there was nothing beneficial in these vials.

26:08 And there was a Polish doctor, researcher, who recently came out,

26:13 and we're still vetting him, full disclosure, Dr. Frank Soluski.

26:18 And he had a batch, which was very interesting to me.

26:22 The batch had two vials in them that were pure normal saline, right?

26:28 Natural, very compatible with the body. It's really nothing.

26:31 And then two vials had these sort of, these chemical parasites,

26:37 which we can get into another time, but it's all, you know,

26:41 other doctors that have found these parasites now.

26:44 And then one other vial that had a lot of graphene-looking,

26:48 you know, other elements, pieces that are unidentifiable,

26:53 even other electron microscopy. Something wrong is going on here.

26:57 And you all, you're getting such an incredible,

27:00 I'm so honored to be with the people that are here today,

27:03 because you are getting the value of probably the world's best minds.

27:09 And I leave myself out, humbly, but today.

27:12 And if you don't shut this thing down for the Jewish people in general,

27:16 much less the children, I don't know.

27:19 You know what, rabbis?

27:20 I at least can look up in the sky at night and say,

27:23 "I did everything you asked me to do today."

27:26 That's okay. Thank you.

27:31 Thank you so much. Again, any of the information that you want to provide

27:36 to our rabbis, you can forward it to us,

27:40 and we will make sure that they can have it.

27:42 Anything you mention that you want the references,

27:45 just make sure that we have it for them to, you know,

27:49 have for the communities that they serve.

27:51 You have one question?

27:53 We have one more question.

27:54 Yes. You said in the beginning that the children are not sparing it.

27:59 What did you mean by that?

28:02 First of all, children don't really get full-blown flu,

28:06 like a major epidemic.

28:09 That's just scientific fact.

28:12 They're not vectors, right?

28:14 I mean, yeah, you can catch a cold from a kid,

28:17 but children probably develop their antibodies so robustly and so rapidly.

28:22 And again, this is, you know, immunology is not my specialty.

28:26 I can only go so far as I can go, honestly.

28:29 They're not big spreaders.

28:32 That was a lie to push this age group down, down, down, right?

28:37 And I want to reiterate that the danger is, and you're seeing it,

28:41 that the lower you go in age, and this is for every side effect,

28:48 the greater the adverse events.

28:51 You've been warned.

28:53 You've been warned.

28:54 Please don't test it out.

28:56 Please don't test it out.

28:58 Children should not be injected with a poison to protect adults.

29:03 It's not a vaccine.

29:04 I want to say it three times.

29:06 It's not a vaccine.

29:07 You should go to bed tonight and say it's not a vaccine.

29:10 It's not a vaccine.

29:12 It's not a vaccine, rabbis.

29:14 You've got to start training yourself.

29:17 Like Dr. David Martin says, if you continue to call it a vaccine,

29:20 you've lost the argument.

29:21 It's over, because nobody can hear you.

29:25 It's not a thing. It's the opposite.

29:29 So the point is that they're getting immune faster,

29:32 so then there is no way that they should spread it once they're immune ready.

29:36 That's the point?

29:37 I would agree with that from some of the papers I've read.

29:40 But again, I'm not a child immunologist,

29:43 but this is what those types of experts have been touting.

29:46 So I'm kind of relaying it, but I'm not saying it myself, absolutely.

29:51 Thank you.

29:52 I do believe it.

29:53 I do believe that.

29:55 She definitely has a question.

29:56 Thank you, Dr. Ruby.

29:57 And thank you for coming and taking the time

29:59 to share your information with our court.

30:02 Okay, let's go to the next question.

30:04 I'm honored to do it.

30:05 Very honored to.

30:06 Thank you for having me again.

30:07 Thank you.

0:00 Thank you.

0:01 Our next speaker is Dr. Christiane Northrup,

0:05 who's an MD, is a board-certified obstetrician and gynecologist,

0:10 a former assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology

0:14 at the University of Vermont College of Medicine.

0:18 She's a former surgeon.

0:20 She was a three-time New York Times bestseller author

0:23 about women's health.

0:24 In 2013, she was empowered, her empowered approach,

0:29 which teaches women how to create health.

0:33 Sorry, excuse me.

0:34 I'm sorry.

0:35 In 2013, she was named one of the 100 most trusted people in America.

0:40 She's internationally known for the approach

0:44 that teaches women how to create health.

0:48 And Dr. Northrup is ideally situated

0:51 to address questions of fertility related to the current shots.

0:57 Thank you so much for that introduction.

1:00 And also, it is my honor to present what I know

1:04 in my bone marrow to the rabbis and those who are holding,

1:11 holding the faith of the Jewish people.

1:14 This shot I have set from the beginning is a murder weapon.

1:19 My colleague, Dr. Lawrence Belewski,

1:22 was the first to bring this to my attention

1:26 that COVID was not a respiratory virus.

1:31 It is a poison.

1:33 And as Dr. Jane Ruby so brilliantly pointed out,

1:37 this is not a vaccine.

1:39 What we are seeing that was astounding to all of us

1:46 was we began to see a pattern in which little babies,

1:50 young babies, 18-month-old babies,

1:53 around recently vaccinated, not well, recently inoculated,

1:58 ranking us, were bleeding, having blood clots the size of eggs

2:03 coming from their vaginas.

2:05 The bleeding that we are seeing in young women, old women,

2:09 children is unprecedented.

2:13 The doctors in my hospital, where I no longer practice,

2:18 because I would not practice in today's hospitals,

2:22 they are doing hysterectomies on women in their 20s and 30s

2:27 to stop them bleeding.

2:29 The other thing that we are seeing,

2:31 and Dr. Lindsay is going to testify on this,

2:35 is infertility clinics.

2:38 The eggs of those who have received the shot

2:41 are no longer developing into embryos.

2:44 The sperm of men who have received the shot

2:48 are no longer motile.

2:51 We are seeing a miscarriage rate 366 times

2:57 what it should be over normal that was recently in the exposé,

3:02 a British journal, the CDC manipulated data

3:06 to show that the COVID-19 vaccines, non-vaccines,

3:10 are safe for pregnant women when, in reality,

3:13 four in five suffered a miscarriage

3:16 when those shots were given in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.

3:20 A comparison of official government reports suggest

3:23 that the fully vaccinated are developing

3:26 acquired immune deficiency syndrome

3:29 much faster than anticipated.

3:32 What we are seeing is the targeting

3:37 of the human reproductive system

3:40 so that in those who have had the shot,

3:43 there is something in the shot called SM-102.

3:47 It is a poison and it's also called luciferase.

3:51 It sequesters in the ovaries at 64 times

3:55 what it does in other organs.

3:58 And now, as Dr. Ruby has pointed out,

4:02 these effects, these so-called side effects,

4:05 are going to be worse in children.

4:09 I have a pediatric cardiologist friend

4:12 and a 15-year-old just came into his office

4:15 with myocarditis following the shot.

4:19 And he said, "I would like you," she was an athlete,

4:23 "I would like you to not do sports for a month

4:26 so that we can minimize the cardiac damage

4:30 that you have suffered."

4:32 What happened?

4:34 The mother was so angry that the doctor would tell the truth

4:38 that she reported him to the board of registration in medicine.

4:44 This is one of the things that is happening.

4:46 There is an absolute hypnosis going on

4:51 within the medical profession.

4:54 My fellow OB/GYNs are telling pregnant women

5:00 that it's fine to get this shot.

5:03 We know from the research of many,

5:06 including Dr. Ruby, Dr. Karen Kingston,

5:09 and Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, that the shot interacts

5:14 with 28 different human tissues.

5:17 It crosses the eyes.

5:19 One of those tissues is called sin-cytin.

5:23 Sin-cytin is actually derived from ancient viruses

5:29 and it is responsible for what's called the sin-cytrotoclast,

5:33 an absolutely essential substance to make a placenta.

5:38 This COVID shot cross-reacts with sin-cytin

5:45 and that is why there are so many miscarriages.

5:50 The other thing that we have seen clinically

5:53 is when pregnant women get the shot,

5:55 many times the placenta itself, because of this cross-reactivity,

6:00 begins to become inflamed.

6:03 And then what you have is a very strange-looking eyes.

6:08 And do I have data on this, controlled, prospective clinical trials?

6:15 No, I do not.

6:17 Because of the, as Dr. Ruby said, the FDA has collapsed.

6:22 As far as I can tell, the clinical acumen,

6:26 the ability to see what's going on right in front of them,

6:30 has also collapsed within a huge majority of my profession.

6:37 How anyone could tell a pregnant woman that it's worse to get COVID,

6:43 which 99.9% of people will recover from,

6:47 especially with early treatment, that it's worse to get COVID,

6:50 so you better get this shot, which is under EUA.

6:55 So how can you mandate anything legally under emergency use authorization?

7:01 How they can do that, frankly?

7:04 I was stunned in the 90s when we started to give all pregnant women

7:09 a flu shot and a DPT in the second trimester of pregnancy.

7:16 It used to be that the pregnant woman and her body

7:21 and her unborn baby were untouchable.

7:25 We told pregnant women,

7:27 "Watch the amount of fish that you eat because of the mercury."

7:32 And now we're injecting them with no toxins by the thousands.

7:39 I loved what Dr. Jane Ruby said,

7:42 which is that she is worried for the entire Jewish population.

7:49 One of my Jewish friends just said to me,

7:53 "The Jews themselves are finishing the job that Hitler began."

7:58 That is a very strong language, I understand.

8:02 We did in Arkler of Millions Against Medical Mandates

8:06 a study called "My Cycle Story,"

8:09 where we collected about 5,000 stories of women

8:14 and children who were leading in very strange ways,

8:19 not only from the inoculation,

8:21 but just being around those who had been inoculated.

8:25 Facebook had a group of maybe 30,000, 40,000 people

8:32 who were talking about their experiences with bleeding.

8:36 Facebook removed it.

8:39 "My Cycle Story" also has stories of women trying to get pregnant

8:45 when their partners are inoculated.

8:49 Instead of getting pregnant,

8:51 the women are passing what are called decidual casts,

8:56 meaning the entire inside decidual of the uterus

9:01 is falling out in one spell swoop.

9:05 There are so many pictures that women have sent us of this kind of thing.

9:10 I was talking with Dr. Lee Merritt, with whom I work.

9:14 She is a Navy spine surgeon, orthopedic surgeon,

9:20 and she said that the doctors that she's talking to

9:24 who are in the academic world

9:27 are in this bubble of peer-reviewed literature.

9:31 She said peer review at this point is nothing like it,

9:34 nothing but the Politburo of the communist countries.

9:38 They don't look outside the peer-reviewed literature.

9:41 They're told, "Don't look over here.

9:44 I'm interested in the experience of those on the front lines,

9:49 the nurse practitioners, the doctors,

9:52 those whose eyes can see and whose ears can hear."

9:57 Now, I testified in front of our legislature here in Maine in March of 2020.

10:03 Against vaccine mandates in general,

10:07 because we are now mandating 72 different vaccines by the age of 18.

10:12 I watched my colleagues one by one.

10:15 We had three overflow rooms of parents with vaccine-injured children.

10:20 Every doctor in the white coat got up there and said,

10:24 "Vaccines are safe and effective," like they put in a date deck.

10:28 Vaccines are safe and effective,

10:30 and the adverse side effects are less than one in a million.

10:34 This is absolutely wrong.

10:37 If you look at the VAERS data,

10:39 and then you look at other data from the World Health Organization,

10:42 and as Tom Reince has pointed out,

10:45 the injuries and deaths are in the thousands, possibly even in the millions.

10:51 If we begin, how many children are we going to have to inject and kill

10:58 for people to wake up to this crime against humanity?

11:05 We can't wait for the controlled prospective trials.

11:10 We have enough cautionary data that if you inject your child with this,

11:16 it's between you and God.

11:19 It's on you.

11:21 Those of you who cannot see this, I pray that you wake up.

11:28 Thank you.

11:29 Thank you.

11:38 Any questions?

11:39 Yes.

11:42 Dr. Northrup, we have a question.

11:45 Yes.

11:47 Do you have any numbers of bleeding or stuff like this, percentages?

11:58 We have not yet compiled our data from my cycle story,

12:05 and that is a survey that we put together so that we could get these numbers.

12:11 Because I agree with you, we need the numbers,

12:15 but the clinical experience of so many is so horrific.

12:19 I would love to give you those numbers,

12:21 and we are in the midst of collecting that data.

12:25 One thing we do have is that New England Journal of Medicine article

12:29 from earlier this spring that shows that four out of five women

12:35 who received the shot in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy had a miscarriage.

12:40 It's interesting that that data is hidden within the study,

12:44 and I remember getting a text from a medical student from Israel,

12:48 and he said to me, "Am I interpreting this right?"

12:53 Many doctors emailed me and said, "Am I interpreting this right?"

12:57 Because it looks like 80% are miscarrying.

13:00 I said, "That's exactly right."

13:02 But it's not reported, and it's hidden in the data.

13:06 Can you make sure we get access to that actual article for us, please?

13:10 Yes, I will do that. If you can give me the email address to send it, I'd be happy to.

13:15 Okay. We'll make sure that we ask you to request that,

13:18 because that's very important information.

13:20 Yes.

13:21 Another question.

13:22 Yeah, so you mentioned at the very beginning of your speech

13:27 that you said that Dr. Lawrence Pollewski brought it to your attention

13:31 that COVID is not a respiratory virus.

13:36 I didn't catch what it is.

13:40 He said it's a poison.

13:42 It's a poison.

13:43 And here's what he said, because Dr. Pollewski ran a pediatric ICU,

13:49 and he said that these people who got whatever this is,

13:56 they were acting like they were poisoned,

14:00 like somehow the blood was not getting oxygenated,

14:04 that the hemoglobin wasn't getting oxygenated.

14:08 It was like cyanide poisoning.

14:10 And I remember at the beginning, in March of 2020,

14:13 there was a respiratory intensive care doctor who went on YouTube,

14:18 and he said, "What I'm seeing does not match a respiratory virus."

14:24 These people have high-altitude pulmonary edema.

14:29 There's something else going on.

14:31 And of course, that video was pulled off of YouTube immediately.

14:36 The amount of censorship of anything other than,

14:41 "We need a vaccine to save humanity,"

14:43 the amount of censorship is absolutely unprecedented.

14:48 I was censored.

14:49 I had 170,000 people on Instagram

14:52 and then lost a second channel of 70,000 people on Instagram.

14:56 And all I've been doing is the same thing I've been doing my entire career,

15:01 which is helping people prevent illness.

15:05 As you know, Dr. Zelenko and his early protocol

15:09 could have saved 80 to 85% of those who have died of whatever this thing is.

15:17 But I'll tell you what, it is not a basic respiratory virus.

15:24 Why did we see so much miscarriages in the middle of the pandemic

15:29 or before people got vaccinated also?

15:34 Does this virus harm the whole system?

15:40 I believe that it can,

15:43 because the spike protein itself appears to be the bio-weapon.

15:49 But no one knows exactly. Dr. Tom Cowen and Dr. Andrew Kaufman

15:55 have said from the very, very beginning that this is not a virus.

16:01 So there's so much that's unknown,

16:04 and the usual sources to which we turn,

16:08 the FDA, the CDC, the so-called trusted sources,

16:12 can no longer be trusted.

16:17 But at least if by the virus this happened,

16:21 by the vaccine, it will happen much, much more.

16:24 That is correct, because the vaccine injects 50 billion spike proteins

16:30 into the person, and then the person becomes a factory for spike proteins.

16:38 It's turning the genetic machinery of the recipient

16:43 into a factory for not only spike proteins,

16:46 but antibodies to the spike proteins.

16:49 I would refer you to Dr. Sherry Timpenny's monograph,

16:53 "The 40 Mechanisms of Injury" from this shot,

16:58 and I can provide that for you.

17:01 Please do. Is there anything that you've seen

17:05 that you know we're making spike proteins?

17:08 Is there anything you've seen in the literature about turning it off?

17:12 Because it seems like they have the on switch.

17:14 Has anything been done, research, in any way, shape, or form,

17:18 peer-to-peer, anything that's out there that regards it shutting off?

17:25 We have some things that are promising,

17:29 and believe me, I'm going to go into that area as deeply as I can.

17:34 One thing I want to say is we know that the shot turns off type 2 macrophages.

17:41 Type 2 macrophages are the ones in the immune system

17:45 that come in to clean up inflammation.

17:48 It's kind of like a fire starts in your house,

17:51 and then you call the fire department,

17:53 and they come in, and they stop the fire.

17:56 What the shot does is it starts the fire,

17:58 and then turns off the fire so that they cannot come in and stop it,

18:02 and that's the cytokine storm.

18:04 Now, we're having some success with homeopathy, with different cleanses.

18:14 These are so far outside standard conventional medicine

18:20 that only those who have seen the big picture would even go near them,

18:26 and this includes therapeutic baths.

18:29 Dr. Karimane talks about this with Epsom salt, with Borax.

18:34 There are detoxification protocols.

18:37 Now, I don't believe that they're going to entirely reverse the damage that was done,

18:43 but I do believe that they'll allow somebody to have a life,

18:50 and I'm doing a lot more research on that, and I'll include the five docs.

18:55 Dr. Sherry Tinpenny, Dr. Kerimane, Dr. Lee Merit, Larry Gillespie, and myself

19:01 are all going to move forward investigating this,

19:05 because that's what's going to be most important in the future.

19:09 At this point, all I can say, again, as Dr. Jane Ruby said,

19:14 if you've had a shot, do not get another one.

19:17 Let's stop the carnage now, because the cleanup is going to be massive.

19:24 Thank you, thank you, thank you, Dr. Christiane Northrup.

19:29 Thank you for your time, for your energy, for your devotion to the human society

19:36 that we are all part of, that without people like yourself,

19:39 we wouldn't even know about the options that are available to us.

19:43 Thank you so much.

19:45 Thank you. It has been my honor and my pleasure.

19:48 Thank you.

0:01 So we now have Dr. Michael Yeadon, who's a PhD,

0:06 who is basically going to testify from the UK.

0:10 Dr. Yeadon is an immunologist and a toxicologist

0:13 with a PhD degree in pharmacology.

0:17 He's the owner of Yeadon Consulting Professional,

0:21 which gives advice on research, and is president and CEO and co-founder

0:27 of Zarko Pharma LTD, a clinical...

0:32 Oh, I said it wrong, right? I'm sorry.

0:35 You want to correct? Okay, you're going to correct me in a second.

0:38 Clinical Stage Biotechnology Company, and a consultant to

0:42 Aplis Pharmaceuticals Guidance on Scientific and Strategic Matters,

0:48 and a consultant to Pull Matrix Operating Company, Inc.,

0:54 for over 17 years.

0:57 He was vice president of Pfizer and was the scientific officer

1:03 with Allergy and Respiratory Research at Pfizer Research and Development.

1:08 That's between 1995 and 2011.

1:13 He left Pfizer on good terms to start his own company,

1:17 and we are honored to have you here to testify.

1:23 Okay, thank you very much indeed, and honored, Rabbi.

1:29 It's a real privilege for me to be able to speak to you.

1:32 I've been listening to the last two presenters,

1:34 and I'm sure a lot of what I'm going to say will overlap,

1:38 but because I bring a PhD or a research scientist viewpoint,

1:42 I probably will be able to fill in some other blanks.

1:45 So in addition to it being an honor,

1:48 I have the urgent and extreme warnings to build on what Dr. Grigee certainly said.

1:55 I'm seriously, I'm convinced that the entire free-eat-human species

2:03 is months from permanent loss of freedom.

2:07 I can't say it more strongly than that.

2:10 I am a Gentile from Christian, non-fact-sent.

2:14 I was honored to be adopted by a U.K. Jewish family lately in childhood,

2:19 and they saved me, and I owe a lot of what's happened in my life to them,

2:24 God bless their souls.

2:27 I'm paying to speak to you today.

2:30 Although I was semi-retired, I had a good reputation,

2:33 I had lots of part-time biotech clients, I had a very good life,

2:37 but for reasons I'm going to tell you about,

2:40 I realized someone needed to speak up very early,

2:44 and so I came back for, shall we say, five from every biotech advisory board

2:49 I was a member of, written to by former Pfizer colleagues,

2:53 who were appalled at what I was saying.

2:55 I'm 100% certain about what I'm going to tell you,

2:59 and I will not speculate beyond the errors

3:02 where I'm certainly inviting and beginning to do it,

3:04 so I'll tell you what I'm doing.

3:06 So I'm an honorable man, I'm not so conspiracy theorist,

3:10 I have never spoken publicly about anything in my entire life

3:15 until 2020, my only public offices would be in the trade press

3:20 of my field, biotechnology.

3:23 I would also comment, a lot of people think,

3:26 well, this can't be happening because institution A, B, or C would surely stop at this.

3:32 Here's my comment, certainly about the United Kingdom.

3:36 All institutions that normally protect the whole democracy are dead,

3:42 all of them, including Westminster.

3:44 The medicines and healthcare regulatory authority is also corrupt and dead.

3:49 All the royal colleges of surgery, obstetrics and psychology are dead,

3:55 none of them are saying anything, and they ought to be dead.

3:59 I've heard from other people who are psychologists that they believe

4:03 the world is caught in what they've described as a mass psychosis.

4:07 So the example we've all heard of is, say, the witch trials.

4:10 So if you imagine kind of ludicrous, exaggerated beliefs,

4:14 instead of being in one small eastern set of villages

4:19 some hundreds of years ago in the US,

4:21 imagine it's now everywhere, every continent, in every home,

4:25 pushed there by psychological operations driven from

4:29 television, internet, print media, radio, relentlessly, day after day after day.

4:35 And the psychologists say that those who are susceptible,

4:39 sadly as most, are now, I think we're in part and parcel of a mass psychosis.

4:45 So these are being claimed, but let me just, I wanted to get off the top.

4:50 I'm not a conspiracy theorist, so I've spent 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry.

4:54 I love trying to create innovatively medicines,

4:57 and I will always back at them, provided they've been properly tested,

5:01 have good profile, and are used appropriately.

5:04 When we come to the vaccines, I will demonstrate to you that

5:07 none of those things are true.

5:09 Okay, so before I get into the answers to the questions,

5:13 it's important that I tell you my view about what happened prior to vaccination.

5:19 Because if you get nothing else from my testimony,

5:22 it will be, I think, to question everything.

5:25 If I have one special talent as a scientist,

5:30 a boss told me that he thought I had a remarkable

5:34 facility to detect failed patterns in sparse data

5:40 longer for other people.

5:42 Sometimes it means I get it wrong, and I see a monster that isn't there.

5:46 But I think that's true. I think almost everything I've done

5:49 that's gone well is because I'm constantly

5:52 probing the data, processing it, looking at the facts.

5:55 And so it was because of that particular attribute,

5:59 and the fact that I was an hourly retire,

6:01 and come to do a delight.

6:03 And I noticed a few odd things about things that

6:07 government scientists were saying.

6:09 And so as early as May 2020, I thought we are in serious trouble.

6:14 My wife tells me I was running up and down the stairs saying,

6:17 "We are in so much trouble. We should have done what's leading it."

6:20 So I would say the responses to the news of an emerging virus from China

6:28 was completely inappropriate.

6:31 And I'm going to demonstrate worse than that.

6:33 It was fraudulent and arranged at an international level.

6:38 Again, it's been claimed that it's re-orphic style.

6:41 I'll point it out to you, and please, like Jane Ruby said,

6:44 "Do not evoke your eyes. However fantastic this sounds, it's true."

6:48 And I will also say, until two years ago,

6:51 I was a travel genican at a conspiracy theorist

6:54 because, of course, I'm such what we call a "normy" middle-class guy.

6:59 You read the ordinary blockchain papers,

7:01 what's the main national broadcaster,

7:04 listens to the radio station from the BBC for 41 years.

7:07 That's how "normy" I am.

7:09 So once I was knocked out of my fur-lined rut,

7:13 I started to feel frightened.

7:16 This is a malign thing.

7:18 It's a malign thing that has taken years to decades to plan.

7:22 It has involved very great skills,

7:24 I suspect, of intelligence core,

7:26 people who understand how to use propaganda, really, through the media.

7:33 And so here we are.

7:34 So why not make data?

7:36 This is a really important opening statement.

7:38 Governments around the world responded to the news

7:42 of this emerging virus with quotes and measures.

7:46 There's a lot of measures, right?

7:47 Masks, lockdowns, business clothes.

7:50 And they responded with measures,

7:52 every one of which is inappropriate or a lie.

7:56 Mostly, they're just straightforward lies.

7:59 And I think that's been part of the bringing about mass psychosis.

8:05 I think our own intelligence services have been co-opted by corrupt people,

8:10 probably over decades.

8:13 And I can show some evidence for that.

8:15 And essentially, they've used sort of a silo of warfare

8:19 against their own people consistently.

8:23 So what did they do?

8:24 What did they do?

8:25 I'll just step through about eight lies.

8:27 So one of my more famous acts is I just walked through all the measures

8:31 that we were required to take, all the characteristics of the virus,

8:35 and then they're all untrue.

8:37 I would say, actually, that one of the--

8:40 I know several of the people who were involved in this.

8:42 So Sir Patrick valence is the chief scientific advisor to the UK government.

8:47 You know, I know that 13 years ago, we were colleagues at local research labs.

8:51 I haven't spoken to him since, but I kept looking at him on the TV,

8:55 singing, "Pat, what the hell are you doing?"

8:57 So I don't know whether he's been on a bright record

9:00 or whatever it's been saying or he's saying, or is he part of some plan.

9:04 I also know Person Johnson Johnson, who's running the vaccine program,

9:08 Dr. Mattime Ann, who I understood to be a very, very good man.

9:13 But he's running the vaccine program, and it gives both drugs and dangers.

9:17 And in AstraZeneca, some men and less, too many handoffs.

9:23 He's running the research on the vaccine side,

9:25 a former psychologist for many years, again, nice guy.

9:28 None of the law parts might even be on top course,

9:30 which is really interesting, isn't it?

9:32 It won't.

9:34 So what are those things, then, that we were told about?

9:37 So as some of his land, you might think, "Oh, my god, he's right."

9:41 So we were told, initially, this new virus had arisen,

9:45 maybe from bats, maybe from lambs, who knows?

9:48 But it had high lethality,

9:51 high proportion of people infected by it were sicker than dying.

9:55 That wasn't true.

9:57 Why would the world find appropriate to take measures

10:01 that were very different from what we've done previously?

10:04 So that's the impression he'd been given.

10:06 I'm sure you think that.

10:08 It's a really frightening virus, it kills lots of people.

10:11 The truth is, now, and we knew it by summer,

10:15 from last year, the latest, that it's lethality.

10:19 That is, the proportion of representative size of the population,

10:23 the proportion of infected who go on to die

10:26 are about the same as seasonal influenza.

10:29 Perhaps a little bit higher,

10:31 but not higher than the worst cases of flu.

10:34 Not at all. Not.

10:36 So this is not an average respiratory virus,

10:39 as a previous witness said,

10:42 but in terms of the fraction of people it killed,

10:45 it's exactly the same of each.

10:47 It's worse at most than an average influenza,

10:51 and since influenza's slightly worse than some years,

10:53 it's slightly less bad than other years.

10:55 I'm telling you, this is well within the envelope

10:58 of the last 20 years of influenza,

11:01 in normal hemisphere lenses and so on.

11:03 Why are we doing all that we're doing?

11:06 See, they just told you it was lethal,

11:09 and it ain't so.

11:11 Next thing, we were given the impression

11:14 that almost anyone who catches and parishes die,

11:17 it's a lie.

11:19 Almost everybody who has got seriously in

11:22 and went on to die

11:24 were close to the end of their life.

11:26 And you know with this one, and it's true when I tell you,

11:29 a median age of someone who's died with COVID

11:33 is within one year of the expected life expectancy

11:37 in any of the community studies.

11:39 In fact, in Britain, it's slightly older.

11:41 83 years is the median age of the last 18 months.

11:45 If someone has died with COVID,

11:47 82 is the median age of this population.

11:50 That means there's no excess deaths.

11:52 No, aren't there?

11:53 So it's not unusual.

11:56 And it doesn't target people that flu doesn't target.

11:59 So by virtue of a great age and chronic illnesses,

12:03 usually two to three or four of them,

12:05 we don't know this without, and I'm not joking,

12:08 everybody knows that there comes a year

12:10 where you don't think you're next birthday.

12:12 And in many cases,

12:13 there will be a respiratory virus in the window

12:15 that will take you away.

12:16 That's what this is.

12:17 Nothing more than that.

12:20 Next thing is we were told this is a new virus,

12:23 and so no one will have immunity.

12:26 That's a lie.

12:27 We know the sequence of this thing.

12:29 It's 80% or more similar to viruses

12:34 that have been around for decades, sometimes many decades.

12:37 What that means is a lot of people have been exposed

12:40 to something somewhat similar to it previously.

12:43 And that means they have what's called acquired immunity,

12:46 which usually lasts for years,

12:48 sometimes lifelong.

12:50 And it means that a big proportion of the population

12:52 haven't got the slightest risk

12:54 of even becoming ill that they won't die.

12:57 We know that there are at least 30 peer-reviewed

13:00 general articles showing this.

13:03 Definitely.

13:04 I know an immunologist.

13:05 It's one of my skill sets.

13:06 I read all the literature.

13:08 I'm absolutely certain of what I've just told you.

13:11 So that's three lies.

13:13 Not everyone is a rare thing.

13:14 And there was prior immunity.

13:16 Why can you scatter through the population?

13:18 PCR testing.

13:20 We're all fed up probably with PCR testing.

13:23 PCR is a wonderful technique.

13:25 It amplifies pieces of nucleic acid,

13:28 so DNA and RNA sequences.

13:30 And it does so in an elegant technique

13:33 invented by a guy who won a Nobel Prize for it.

13:38 And he said this is a great technique for making something.

13:41 So he put a template in,

13:43 and he run what I call probes, and he run cycles of amplification.

13:47 He makes a lot of something out of something,

13:49 as he used to say with a southern girl.

13:51 But he said it's completely unsuitable

13:54 for diagnosing clinical illness.

13:57 So if my nose and throat are swapped,

13:59 I've had to keep several times,

14:01 if they have advice enough,

14:03 you can usually get something out of nothing.

14:06 In other words, a false positive.

14:07 We know that if 40 cycles of amplification,

14:11 which is heating, cooling, and sort of making a copy.

14:14 So if you just imagine I go,

14:16 this is getting that kind of printer.

14:18 Every time it turns out, it makes another,

14:20 in fact, it makes a double of it.

14:22 And if you use 40 cycles,

14:24 which most countries have been using in their public health departments,

14:27 almost all of the positive results are so-called false positive.

14:31 Over-amplified it.

14:32 You know, it's like turning the amplifiers on your speakers up to 11.

14:36 It's just distortion, distortion.

14:39 And so this test, the PCR test,

14:42 is effectively fraudulent.

14:44 And I knew it was fraudulent very early on.

14:47 And I wrote a key to Professor Kristin Joshkin in Berlin.

14:51 He's the same person who designed the PCR test

14:54 for the swine flu pandemic in 2009.

14:58 That method was developed over the weekend

15:02 after his lab received its sequence from women.

15:05 And the WHO was recommending it.

15:09 Test, test, test.

15:10 Remember, using this test, designed by Joshkin,

15:13 it's a low-fidelity test.

15:15 It's used as excessive scientific application.

15:17 It's meaningless.

15:19 In the UK, we're running a million tests a day,

15:22 a million tests a day,

15:24 excessive to almost anyone.

15:26 And the positivity rate,

15:28 the rates of tests that are positive results point to 25%.

15:32 So that produces, I think, 25,000 a day.

15:36 I can tell you, and I've discussed this with a very experienced diagnostic pathologist.

15:42 It's probably the most famous one in the UK.

15:44 We agree about this discussion.

15:46 It'd be really hard to get what's called the false positive rate,

15:49 much below 1% for a technique like this.

15:53 You used it in like a production line.

15:55 Normally, these techniques, you have to do them really carefully.

15:58 I'm not joking.

15:59 That's next to it. You walk backwards away from your bench.

16:02 Otherwise, you will contaminate things.

16:04 The idea that we've got inexperienced graduates

16:07 running this test in private facilities,

16:09 a million a day, multiple steps,

16:12 and it being at any one of those, it's always just one.

16:15 A friend of mine spent 30 years running this test

16:18 and volunteered to work in one of these labs,

16:21 in Milton Keynes in the UK,

16:23 and he came out three weeks later saying it's utter garbage.

16:26 The false positive rate would be any number,

16:28 and they don't determine it.

16:30 So they don't determine the false positive rate.

16:32 They never put known negative samples

16:36 blinded through the chain of custody, nowhere.

16:39 That's criminal.

16:41 This is the most important diagnostic test ever run on earth.

16:45 Everywhere, no one is running negative controls.

16:48 I just told you, positivity in the UK, 0.25%.

16:52 I think that's generously the false positive rate.

16:56 I think that almost all false positives.

16:59 Next, and here we're told, go get tested.

17:02 This is something, and then you do something.

17:04 If you're positive, you're different than you can make it.

17:06 It's just not a good test.

17:09 Masks.

17:10 Often, the word of a mask mandate,

17:13 you've said the right to wear them,

17:14 and there are plenty of people.

17:16 I'm afraid masks have been studied.

17:18 And remember, my field is respiratory,

17:20 so I understand a lot about small particles

17:23 positioned in the upper and lower railways of human beings.

17:26 It's a really difficult thing to do,

17:28 so my expertise comes from working with

17:30 inhaler device manufacturers for asthma and chronic pancreatitis.

17:35 It's really hard to get particles to deposit in the lung.

17:38 You have to unsound the distribution of aerosol sizes, by the way.

17:44 Masks have got huge pores in them,

17:47 and a mix of loads of breathing out through them.

17:50 Other viral particles are about a thousand times smaller than the next.

17:54 It's literally not possible.

17:56 If you have viruses in your breath,

17:59 in your exhaled breath, which will drop their tiny droplets,

18:02 they'll just go in and out through the mask.

18:04 Masks don't work.

18:05 They also don't work, because they don't filter.

18:07 We all know this.

18:08 You put one of those blue masks on,

18:10 you've got glasses like me, glasses like the first breath.

18:13 All your breath just goes around between the mask and your face.

18:16 They're pure theatre.

18:18 We knew they didn't work.

18:19 We didn't know I immediately did this work.

18:21 Do you know what they're for?

18:23 They're not for protecting patients from a physician's bacteria or anything.

18:27 In fact, that was studied in the '90s by very brave surgeons

18:30 who did about 500 operations, sometimes with a mask,

18:34 sometimes with the permission of patients.

18:37 No difference whatsoever in postoperative infections.

18:41 The band was slightly lower than the group that didn't wear masks.

18:45 What do masks do?

18:47 What do physicians and nurses occasionally wear them?

18:50 What the main reason if they're doing any surgery

18:53 or respecting a person in accident and immersibility or the ER

18:57 is to make sure that blood, pus, and other fluids don't enter their nose and mouth.

19:03 That's what they're for.

19:05 And they're pretty good at that,

19:07 but they have absolutely zero impact on respiratory virus transmission.

19:11 And if you search on the internet, you can find Dr. Fanti saying exactly that.

19:16 He said it's actually that.

19:17 And I'm telling you, there's a specialist in respiratory vascular devastation,

19:20 and there are loads of papers.

19:22 If you want me, I can cite papers to support each of the things I'm saying.

19:26 I've got two or three of them.

19:28 Three other lies.

19:30 Transmission, asymptomatic transmission.

19:33 I think you'll probably know what that is.

19:35 It means people without symptoms infecting other people.

19:39 It's a lie.

19:40 You're probably not surprised.

19:42 It's been studied in great detail,

19:44 and they studied family members who were positive by PCR

19:49 who had had symptoms and those who did not.

19:51 And they followed them out several weeks.

19:53 They found that people who were symptomatic

19:55 were able to infect close family members about one in five times.

20:00 You might think he was more, but remember what I told you,

20:03 that a lot of people had RNA vaccine.

20:06 But the people without symptoms,

20:08 they managed to infect a family member about 0.7%.

20:13 Which I believe is the false positive rate of test.

20:16 I think it either never happens

20:18 or is epidemiologically irrelevant.

20:21 And we've known this.

20:22 Our mothers told us this.

20:23 Don't fuck with people, you know.

20:25 You know, you look fit and well, you can go to school.

20:28 If you feel sick, you've got symptoms.

20:30 Stay at home.

20:31 Don't be selfish.

20:32 So asymptomatic transmission is a lie.

20:36 But it's a really important lie.

20:38 Because on the basis of,

20:40 I could be healthy-looking and be a respiratory virus threat

20:43 to you that might kill you.

20:45 Means you'll be frightened of me as we approach on the sidewalk.

20:48 People throw themselves on the sofa tracker.

20:50 But if you are free of symptoms,

20:52 it's not possible to infect someone else.

20:56 And so this isn't just for me asotic.

20:58 Let me explain why that is.

21:00 To be a good source of respiratory virus,

21:03 you need to have a lot of it in your airways.

21:06 If you have a lot of virus in your airways,

21:08 it's attacking you.

21:10 You are fighting back.

21:12 That's symptoms.

21:14 You can't have lots of virus in the airways,

21:16 thus be a good source of infection without symptoms.

21:20 It ain't possible.

21:22 It's been true all the time.

21:24 It's an adaptation right from, you know,

21:26 coming down out of the trees.

21:28 It meant that one of the things that could kill you

21:30 is if you capture a respiratory virus,

21:32 like flu that might make you ill for a couple of weeks,

21:34 you could die back in the next day.

21:36 So we are really good at detecting

21:38 whether someone approaching us

21:40 looks like they have respiratory symptoms.

21:42 And if they do, we steer clear of them.

21:44 It's just automatic.

21:46 The reason this is so important to tell you is

21:49 they've instilled fear into people

21:53 that a perfectly healthy person,

21:55 as far as I can see, could kill them.

21:57 And it's not true.

21:58 But what a clever sign-up that's been.

22:00 And then the next is,

22:01 we're going to make you wear masks

22:03 to protect you and God will wear masks.

22:05 Not a clever sign-up.

22:06 So now that you feel anxious all the time,

22:08 looking around you,

22:09 seeing dangerous signs of people wearing masks.

22:12 And then, of course, lockdowns.

22:16 And it's awful.

22:17 We do know now that what we call lockdowns,

22:21 and they vary from place to place,

22:23 could essentially stare at home orders,

22:25 business closures, sometimes public transport closures,

22:29 and some extreme places, house arrest,

22:31 literally, not a lot of outside.

22:33 It's been studied probably about half of the world now

22:37 has been studied through that spring period

22:39 and published in more than 30 peer-reviewed journal articles.

22:44 This is a very frustrating time for me as a scientist

22:47 because everything I'm telling you

22:49 is supported in peer-reviewed journals.

22:51 So you might think, well, why isn't that being broadcast?

22:55 And it's because all the media organisations

22:57 are party to censorship, lies, and suppression

23:01 of people like me.

23:03 I'm not making it up.

23:05 So lockdowns have been studied.

23:09 They make absolutely no difference

23:11 to the spreading of the respiratory viruses.

23:14 And you might think that simply can't be true,

23:16 not to you, because surely this is a disease

23:19 that's transmitting from person to person.

23:21 It reduces the number of interactions

23:23 that must reduce spreading.

23:26 I understand the argument.

23:28 I couldn't counter it for a while, but I can now.

23:30 And it comes back to the idea of asymptomatic transmission.

23:36 If you are a good source of infection,

23:39 if you have a lot of virus in the airways,

23:41 you have symptoms.

23:43 We used to call that being ill.

23:45 If you're ill with something like flu,

23:47 if you've ever had flu, like I did about three months ago,

23:50 you're still not properly better.

23:52 You're not going out to work.

23:54 You're not going to the supermarket.

23:56 You might stumble to the corner store

23:58 to get my blueprint done or whatever.

24:01 Here's my key point.

24:02 The people who were good sources of transmission,

24:06 self-selected to stay at home.

24:09 So outside, if you walked around in normal lives,

24:12 sharks would encounter a good source of respiratory virus

24:15 and catch code it.

24:17 At the height of the pandemic, it was roughly zero

24:20 because there were almost no people who could have

24:22 affected you as they're ill and they're at home.

24:24 Now transmission definitely does occur.

24:27 And it occurs very well when people are symptomatic

24:30 and are kind of trapped next to susceptible people.

24:34 What do I mean?

24:35 Where in the world are there people

24:37 who are involuntarily mobilized

24:40 and encounter susceptible people?

24:42 In answer, hospitals, care homes,

24:45 to a small extent private residential home.

24:48 I think almost all of transmission happened there,

24:51 obviously so, because that's the only place

24:53 where you get symptomatic virus-filled people,

24:57 next to susceptible people, and it never happened.

24:59 I don't think a single case has been

25:01 absolutely certainly confirmed to be outside

25:04 ever in the whole world during the last 18 months.

25:07 So lockdowns didn't work

25:10 and we knew they wouldn't just follow the logic.

25:13 So by the time we were in our third lockdown,

25:16 I knew, I knew, and one accepted.

25:20 I knew that there was a plot going on.

25:23 It's not a mistake.

25:25 Those are the main lives.

25:27 I'm not penalized.

25:28 All of these things are lies.

25:30 They're not mistakes.

25:32 Airframe response contradicts decades

25:35 of settled pandemic preparedness planning,

25:39 decades of settled pandemic preparedness plans.

25:43 The WHO and each individual country

25:45 had their pandemic preparedness plans,

25:47 which included none of these things.

25:50 None of these things hand-wash, pretty much,

25:52 and stare home into your symptomatic real deal.

25:55 Now that was the plan plan.

25:56 No border crossings, no mass testings of the well,

25:59 no masking, certainly no lockdowns.

26:03 So that's the thing.

26:05 If you can find a patched copy of the WHO pandemic,

26:09 preparedness plans for influenza,

26:11 and of course this is rather similar in its lethality,

26:14 didn't have opinions for things that we're being required to do.

26:17 See, now we've seen acceptings as kind of mold.

26:20 They're all nonsense.

26:22 And they make people fearful.

26:24 They destroy the economy.

26:25 They smash the society.

26:27 But here's the thing that terrified me when I realized,

26:30 because I focused on PCR testing because it was my real house.

26:34 But when I realized all of the things that we're telling us

26:37 were just a little bit detected,

26:38 every single one of them is a flat line.

26:40 It's almost chutzpah, isn't it?

26:42 They're lying this much.

26:44 I remember realizing this at 3 in the morning,

26:47 and I almost got howled because I realized what this meant.

26:50 Dozens of countries within a few days in the spring of 2020

26:55 discarded their well-thought-through pandemic preparedness plans

26:59 that I simply as I just explained,

27:01 and instead installed these eight lines.

27:04 And they came out of the TV and the radio and the print media,

27:07 and all the experts just kept saying it again and again and then.

27:10 I didn't know where they hypnotized, were they bright or threatened.

27:13 I didn't know.

27:14 It could be that most people just went and went and went in particular direction,

27:17 and that's where they go.

27:19 I'm not like that.

27:20 I've always been a little bit difficult.

27:22 I'm cooperative, but I want to know that what I'm doing makes sense.

27:26 The last really horrible lie was this for some reason,

27:32 this COVID-19, the respiratory virus illness

27:37 was not susceptible to any treatments.

27:39 And so, you know, sadly, you know, stare at home and hope that they're dying.

27:43 Please don't turn up to the hospital unless you're blue in prison.

27:46 That's exaggerating what people have said.

27:48 In fact, other people like Dr. Peter McCullough, Pierre Corrie,

27:52 Tess Lorry, Zetilenko, I Will Miss People,

27:56 and Didier in South France,

27:59 they did not accept treatment nihilism.

28:03 They thought, this is crazy.

28:04 This is a viral pneumonia of some kind.

28:07 Let's try the things that we would normally do

28:10 to try out the slow viral replication of inflammation in the mid-space

28:15 below clotting later on.

28:17 And there are at least six recognized treatments,

28:20 hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, zinc, zeptomycin,

28:25 predesinide, dexamine, and fluvoxamine.

28:28 I fade off into the corner.

28:30 There was a big peer-reviewed journal article

28:32 with about 70 authors, led by Peter McCullough in Texas,

28:36 the most published cardiac renal physician in the world.

28:41 And as I said, he greatly suffered some scenarios

28:45 of being fired and smeared and so on

28:47 to make sure that this paper came together

28:49 working across the world.

28:51 So these treatments have been suppressed, repressed.

28:55 Anyone mentioned can call it a conspiracy theorist or lunatic.

29:00 But they worked logically early on, which is viral replication.

29:04 It's viral replication later, inflammation later, like clots.

29:07 And a small number of people still unfortunately died.

29:10 But if you use these treatments, 810 people,

29:12 even the Elgin people, get better.

29:15 And yet there's a being banned in some places.

29:18 Prescription is not filled with pharmacies and so on.

29:21 It's just relentless.

29:23 So I'm going to now speak about the vaccines.

29:25 I'm going to get on to your questions, and I'll show you some quick notes.

29:28 And thank you for the clarity of your questions.

29:30 It will allow me to be very precise.

29:32 But I hope you can hear in my engagement and emotion

29:37 how important it is to communicate to you

29:40 that this whole bloody thing-- excuse my language--

29:43 it's a fraud.

29:46 It's absolutely a fraud.

29:48 The virus is unpleasant.

29:50 I really wouldn't want to catch it.

29:52 But it's not a big deal in public health terms.

29:56 It's actually probably one of the more treatable

30:00 respiratory viral illnesses.

30:01 You won't hear that step on CNN.

30:04 It's one of the more well treatable respiratory viral illnesses

30:08 we've ever encountered.

30:09 Much better than influenza.

30:10 We do much better with COVID.

30:13 So before I talk about the vaccines,

30:16 I'm just going to tell you three things about the vaccines.

30:19 I'm a massive fan of innovative medicines and vaccines.

30:23 I have all the vaccines you would expect.

30:25 My children did.

30:27 My grandchildren not.

30:28 I don't trust the pharmaceutical industry anymore.

30:31 I don't recognize the industry.

30:33 I spent 32 years in something horrible that's happened.

30:36 So these vaccines aren't needed

30:40 because most people wouldn't sit in or die.

30:43 And the ones that got very sick could easily be treated

30:47 successfully in 80% of the cases

30:49 by the treatments I've just summarized.

30:51 So great if they work and they're safe, that's great.

30:54 But if we didn't have them, we could come through this easily.

30:57 So they're not needed.

30:58 They don't work very well.

31:00 I think we all know that.

31:02 People have been vaccinated near 90% in some communities,

31:06 even higher in cases breaking out.

31:08 People are getting sick and dying.

31:10 They're not working very well.

31:12 And then not safe.

31:13 The public database of adverse event reporting

31:17 is just a towering mass of suffering, humanness, and death.

31:22 So that's why I'm going to tell you about the virus,

31:25 the battle vaccines.

31:27 But as I say, I'm a big fan of innovative new medicines.

31:30 I wasn't a mob for those few years.

31:32 I love science.

31:33 I love applied science.

31:34 My things don't work, how to make them better.

31:37 That's what my job was.

31:39 So as long as the vaccines are well-designed, properly tested,

31:45 should be safe and effective, used appropriately,

31:48 I would get behind, stand to the side of any person

31:52 wanting to move forward.

31:54 But unfortunately, these gene-based so-called vaccines,

31:58 I really do think they're gene therapy,

32:00 but they're none of the above.

32:03 They don't even faintly meet any of the four criteria,

32:07 let alone all of them.

32:09 And just in brief, there are no such--

32:12 there are no products like this on the market

32:15 anywhere in the world.

32:17 So people have said, oh, well, we're building on 30 years

32:20 of research, and this is just its culmination.

32:22 Well, far enough, there are zero products,

32:25 like it's not even treatment of rare cancers or something

32:28 where the medical need is so high,

32:31 you'd be willing to take something that's novel

32:33 and therefore might not work.

32:35 It might be dangerous.

32:36 The idea that we can go from where we were 10 years ago

32:41 to vaccinating the world, and that's

32:43 a safe and reasonable thing to do, is just luminosity.

32:46 10 years ago, when I left Pfizer, the kind of technology

32:51 that's installed in these--

32:53 well, I call them the regime best vaccines to be kind,

32:55 but they're really just-- they are kind of temporary therapy.

32:59 I would say the fair characterization

33:01 was that they were a very interesting laboratory tool

33:05 and curiosity, but a very long way from prime time,

33:10 even being rare cancers.

33:12 So when I learned in the middle of 2020,

33:15 the design of these things were absolutely terrifying,

33:18 because I knew 10 years ago they were

33:20 with unreliable lactose, and now they're

33:22 telling me they're going to be vaccines.

33:24 Now, we all know, don't we, that what's

33:27 the number one requirement for any public health medical

33:31 intervention, safety, safety, safety?

33:34 Because you're going to expose so many people.

33:37 That's your chocolate con.

33:38 It's even ahead of it.

33:39 Does it work?

33:40 It's like, is it safe?

33:41 I can't believe it.

33:42 It's brand new technology.

33:44 We've not done very much testing.

33:46 And then I knew, just by looking at it,

33:50 I knew by looking at their design, they would be unsafe.

33:53 Why do I say that?

33:55 All of them, two have encoded in DNA and two encoded mRNA,

34:00 just a different stage of genes to protein.

34:03 They all encoded-- the coronavirus spike protein,

34:08 the sticky antibiotic that you see,

34:11 like the noughts on a mine floating in the water,

34:16 like the triggers.

34:17 So the spike protein.

34:19 I can kind of understand maybe roughly, visually,

34:22 why the spike protein.

34:23 Because people will think, well, that's

34:25 on the outside of the virus.

34:26 So that's what your immune system will see.

34:29 But unfortunately-- and we've definitely

34:31 known this for more than 10 years--

34:33 the spike proteins on coronaviruses

34:36 are biologically active.

34:38 They cause cells to stick together,

34:40 and they initiate blood coagulation.

34:44 And there's a literature showing this,

34:46 and that's why it was absolutely terrifying.

34:48 I thought, digging it from metabolic disorders

34:50 in a fraction of the people who've been tested.

34:53 And together with a public health doctor called Dr. Wolfgang

34:56 Bogard in Germany, it turns out, I

34:59 think we probably wrote the first serious scientific

35:02 treaties of concern publicly.

35:04 There was a petition for the European Medicine Agency

35:06 to say, we really think you should slow down

35:09 and not approve under emergency conditions these vaccines.

35:13 Because here's the general concern

35:15 that they're not what we've no idea what they will do.

35:18 And you've only tested a few people for two and a half

35:21 months at that time.

35:22 And you're planning on injecting the world.

35:24 We guess right there.

35:27 But here are four or five specific concerns

35:30 that we had of the ones that have been tested.

35:34 They've all come out, I'm afraid, the way we warned.

35:38 So we warned for a small proportion of people

35:40 would have a cute allergic reactions called

35:42 damnitolactyl reactions.

35:43 That's what happened on day one in the UK.

35:46 That's one of our concerns.

35:48 In other words, blood clots.

35:49 I mean, it's--

35:50 700% of the severe drug residents

35:52 are formically involved, clotting and bleeding.

35:55 It's obvious from this point of view.

35:58 You have to be-- if you're scientifically aware,

36:01 you're in denial or lying to yourself.

36:03 You could disagree with what I just said.

36:06 And I predicted it before we even went to the mass market.

36:09 Another one, unfortunately, does relate to pregnancy,

36:13 fertilization pregnancy.

36:15 So I'm going to go over it now.

36:16 I would say the jury is out, but there's--

36:18 there are worrying signs emerging.

36:20 And then the long-term one is long-term.

36:23 It's we've no idea what this will do.

36:25 If you inject it in a 15-year-old,

36:27 how will they be in 10 years?

36:29 No idea.

36:30 How come you know that?

36:31 We haven't-- we've got six months of data.

36:33 We can't possibly know it.

36:35 How can this be anything other than stupid and reckless?

36:39 You know, I've been in novel medicines all of my life,

36:43 and one of my close degrees was toxicology.

36:46 We often find out things are toxic,

36:48 and afterwards we worked out why that was.

36:51 So thalidomide is one of the famous cases, right?

36:54 So we didn't start trying to poison pregnant women.

36:58 But when that happened, it later was found out how it happened.

37:02 And it later changes in the regulation of testing.

37:06 So I'm just saying, rock out.

37:09 So I would say the vaccines are being misused right now.

37:12 It's simply not necessary.

37:14 It follows from what I said earlier,

37:16 that it's not the whole population that's at risk.

37:19 If we look at the people who get ill and die,

37:22 as mentioned earlier,

37:23 generally people of advanced years who are also chronically ill.

37:26 Why do I want a vaccine in my children,

37:28 but in their 20s healthy government, they're unprecedented.

37:33 And I think soon their babies,

37:35 you know, between less than one year and less than three.

37:38 This is insane.

37:40 I know the people who get seriously ill and die

37:42 in their 60s, 70s, 80s, and 61.

37:44 I don't think at any time they get COVID.

37:46 I'm far too late.

37:48 And if I do, well, that's just tough luck.

37:50 You don't vaccinate the entire population

37:52 against a risk that's extraordinary and relative.

37:55 Give it to the volunteers who want to take it

37:58 and feel vulnerable and stop.

38:00 In fact, if they didn't do that,

38:02 it tells them this is a take-over.

38:04 They're going to vaccinate.

38:05 It's going to be a needle in every arm.

38:08 It's not a conspiracy theory.

38:10 In fact, that's what they're doing.

38:12 They're threatening you,

38:13 and everybody can't have a freedom back unless you do it.

38:16 It's nonsense.

38:17 This is a control tool.

38:19 And then vaccine passports to confirm that you've been jagged.

38:22 Remember, we've recently learned

38:25 that these vaccines are so poor,

38:27 they work so poorly,

38:28 they don't stop you getting infected

38:30 and they don't stop you transmitting it.

38:32 Well, that's the end of the argument

38:34 for vaccine passports.

38:36 Nevertheless, they are being pushed.

38:38 They'll be rolled out in my country in the next few weeks.

38:41 They are a movement license.

38:43 Once you're digitally on this system,

38:46 and everyone on the world is,

38:47 it's an end of human freedom,

38:49 because they will regulate access to food

38:52 based on the presence of a valid vaccines.

38:56 They will tell you you have to be boosted

38:58 every six months, like Israel.

39:00 If you don't turn up with vaccines expires,

39:02 you can't get food,

39:04 or go to work, or public transport.

39:07 You guys, if you don't say something,

39:11 it's the end of humanity.

39:13 Now, I'm taking a risk,

39:14 and every person that's spoken to has taken a risk,

39:16 and they're all paying for it.

39:17 I can tell you, I don't feel safe.

39:20 But it's not likely stopping,

39:22 because there's no peace in denial.

39:25 And we've been lied to by every government agency.

39:29 They've told us characteristics of the virus

39:31 and how we should behave that are destructive,

39:34 and their lives, every single one of them.

39:36 It's so ambitious, the lies.

39:38 And, you know, so that's where we are.

39:40 And now we've got these vaccines that are rushed in development,

39:44 not only in technology. By design, unfortunately,

39:47 dangerous, have killed hundreds of thousands of people

39:51 around the world dying within days to weeks of vaccination.

39:54 Not COVID, but the side effects of expression

39:57 in the body of spike-crowsiness.

39:59 I think one of your earlier contributors has said

40:03 you would expect with a new medication to study

40:06 what's called kinetics, where does it go,

40:08 how long does it last, how much does it make,

40:11 how long, and in some people's locations,

40:14 not one part of that has been studied.

40:17 And, you know, obviously, in some poor people,

40:20 it ends up in the draining cerebral veins.

40:23 They're named up with cerebral veins,

40:25 and that's the thrombosis brain blood clot did.

40:28 Lots of young women have had that.

40:30 Or it might go to your heart and get it with myocarditis.

40:33 Lots of young men have been guessing that.

40:35 Or deep veins thrombosis.

40:37 Or just a generalized stroke.

40:39 Or pulmonary embolism, blood clots in the lungs.

40:42 That is occurring at 400 times the frequency

40:46 we normally see after vaccination,

40:48 which is really low.

40:50 But it's at 400 times more common.

40:53 And of course, we're injecting into people

40:56 gene sequences, which then copy, make your body

40:59 into a factory for a blood clot-promoting spike protein.

41:04 And like I said, as a toxicologist,

41:07 this is going to fully reach the market.

41:09 And my Dr. Vodar's petition is in the public record

41:13 dated 1st of December last year.

41:16 So to children, to your questions,

41:19 I can go through them really quickly,

41:21 and then you can ask me things if I'm not being clear.

41:24 So should the children get the vaccine widely?

41:26 No.

41:27 I think arguably, not so.

41:29 I don't even think vulnerable children should get it.

41:31 I think it's far too dangerous.

41:33 You should give them instead, if they need it,

41:35 the safe and effective therapies the doctor,

41:37 Peter Madalik and others have promoted.

41:39 That's what we should do.

41:41 So why not then?

41:43 Children are not at risk.

41:45 They very rarely seem to even catch the virus.

41:48 They encounter it, and their immune system

41:50 learns what it is, and it's now immune.

41:53 They don't seem to get ill.

41:54 We understand something of why children don't get ill.

41:58 We probably know, as far as it binds to something

42:01 called ACE-2 receptors.

42:02 It's like a docking receptor on a service and setup.

42:06 Young children have a low density of ACE-2 receptors

42:09 in their nose and nasopharynx.

42:11 So for that, maybe, and for other reasons,

42:14 children don't seem to get infected very easily.

42:17 They rarely get ill.

42:18 Extraordinarily, rarely have to go to hospital.

42:21 And I think the number of children in Britain,

42:24 for example, who died of the virus rather than with it,

42:27 who were previously healthy, approximate zero.

42:30 It may be five or so.

42:32 But remember, 1% of the population die every year anyway.

42:35 So I'm sorry to ever get the stand,

42:38 but it may not be unusual or tragic.

42:40 And it's simply not the case that children are at risk.

42:43 But here's back to this point on earlier

42:45 about ACE symptomatic transmission.

42:47 If children don't get floridly ill,

42:50 and they're not coughing and covering themselves

42:52 in mucus and so on, they can't infect around that.

42:56 And that's the truth.

42:58 And we know this is true.

43:00 Sweden was the only country

43:02 that never closed its primary schools

43:04 through the whole pandemic.

43:06 And they studied afterwards,

43:08 in the summer of last year and published it.

43:10 What was the fraction of children

43:13 who ended up going to hospital or dying?

43:15 Was it different from any current group of children?

43:17 The answer was no.

43:19 They then also looked at the medical experiences

43:22 of their teachers.

43:24 And it turned out there was slightly less at risk of COVID

43:28 than people who didn't work with children.

43:30 And I think it's probably because they got meningidosis

43:32 of virus around the classroom.

43:35 And people got south of China.

43:37 They got essentially vaccinated with each other

43:39 by giving them south clinically non-infectious basis.

43:42 So that's the truth.

43:43 And it's the only country that never closed their schools.

43:46 And so that's the living laboratory.

43:48 And they did it because they had clever,

43:50 presumably non-corrupted public health officials.

43:53 So that's why we shouldn't do it.

43:56 And then I was asked,

43:57 is the vaccine harmful to children?

43:59 Unfortunately, in adults, we're seeing something like 60,

44:03 60 times the normal rate of deaths.

44:07 So I'm not implying that normal vaccines kill me,

44:11 but I think that is extremely rare.

44:14 But coincident, because people die throughout the year

44:18 and people get vaccinated at various times,

44:20 you will find coincident within days.

44:22 Two weeks of vaccination, some people will die.

44:24 And that's how statistical, overlapping vaccination

44:27 schedules and, you know, it being your time.

44:30 And so we see in the US VAERS system,

44:35 a self-report system where it is suspected,

44:38 but not obviously known,

44:40 that the vaccination caused the side effect,

44:42 in this case, death,

44:43 which is normally like a couple hundred coincident at the year.

44:47 It's now up to, I think, 17 or 18,000

44:50 in the sort of nine or 10 months of this year.

44:53 It's not small, you know, this is not a subtle effect.

44:56 You don't need to argue about it.

44:58 It's just, I'm afraid, public health experts, the media,

45:02 they're either going to denial or they're simply choosing

45:05 not to report the data.

45:06 But we've been all over the data,

45:08 and there's simply no question that it's going to be,

45:11 well, it's about 60 times the normal rate.

45:13 So in other words, it is causative.

45:15 I know it's causative as well,

45:17 because if it was just random,

45:19 the time between injection and death would be random,

45:22 but in fact, it's not.

45:24 So something like a third of the people were going to die

45:26 dying the first 36 hours and over half in two days.

45:30 So, you know, the proximity to the injection and the event,

45:33 proximity of the injection and the event have been really short,

45:36 tells us it's likely to be causative.

45:38 And then finally, plausibility.

45:40 What are they dying of?

45:41 And 70% dying of blood clots and bleeding,

45:44 and I just told you by design,

45:45 he's bringing it out from embolic disorders.

45:49 So that's that.

45:50 And then, D, what's the cost-benefit ratio?

45:53 I think there's an opening harm for children.

45:56 I think they're not at risk,

45:58 not at special risk to warrant to do anything

46:01 as a public health measure.

46:03 Certainly, we should take the handouts off of physicians.

46:08 Actually, we should be allowed to use, you know,

46:11 medicines that look like there's pretty good data.

46:14 They shouldn't be barred or fired or have these drugs.

46:17 There have been, in many cases, for decades,

46:20 either acting as one of the world health organizations,

46:23 essential drugs.

46:24 They say every country should have dense children.

46:27 It's been prescribed, I think, over three and a half billion times.

46:31 It's not experimental medicine.

46:32 It's not a horse-based either.

46:34 It was designed for humans.

46:36 It's derived from a natural product.

46:38 Initially, humans.

46:39 Later on, they found some bad,

46:41 very similar excuses as well.

46:44 So, these drugs have been around for a long time.

46:46 Hydroxychloroquine, an anti-malarial drug,

46:48 it was known in the SARS epidemic in 2003

46:52 that hydroxychloroquine and its predecessor

46:56 are really quite useful antivirals.

46:58 People like factory knew that.

47:00 They published on Vegas.

47:01 So, the literature is what it is.

47:03 It's people denying it.

47:05 So, I would say these vaccines are probably killing,

47:07 but I'm sure they came more than they saved.

47:09 Certainly, today, specifically on children,

47:12 I would run and never look back

47:14 if someone came near my grandchild

47:16 or, you know, people who were the only children.

47:20 There's a negative prospect, absolutely.

47:23 My government's all over the world doing this.

47:26 It was not on the hardcore side.

47:28 So, as I explained earlier, I'm sorry.

47:30 I think there is a conspiracy.

47:32 There's nothing theoretical about what's happening.

47:36 I mean, just starting a pandemic preparedness plan

47:39 scores the countries at the same time

47:42 and adopting all of those measures

47:44 and characteristics and statements that are lies checkable.

47:48 You can get a check answer of the examples just to see.

47:51 You know, you won't catch the answers.

47:53 I spent 15 to 18 hours a day,

47:55 so I fell some 18 months doing this.

47:59 So, I think it's a conspiracy to vaccinate

48:02 every person on the planet,

48:03 and to use that status registered in a vaccine passport

48:07 or a digital ID to do whatever they will.

48:10 I personally think that they're going to kill

48:12 most of the population.

48:14 The reason I say that is there's been such reckless behavior

48:17 in people's health that's led to hundreds of thousands

48:20 of avoidable deaths.

48:23 Anyone whose plan has that and has allowed that to happen,

48:26 even if it wasn't required, it's just a consequence.

48:30 So, in enough cases, in complete psychostics,

48:33 these are not people who are going to let us have a nice

48:36 Chinese state of credit system,

48:38 not liable to live in a world like that anyway.

48:40 So, I think they're going to use...

48:42 I don't think they're going to use boosters during 2022

48:46 to murder a big proportion of the world's population.

48:49 It's so easy to do it now.

48:51 That's why I said earlier, we are weeks to months, at most,

48:55 from the end of human freedoms,

48:57 when vaccine passports are introduced everywhere

48:59 and brought to you by the public and demanded by vendors

49:03 and, you know, shopkeepers and so on.

49:05 There's no escape.

49:07 Even if you laser beam, oh, my God, this is what they're doing.

49:09 What are you going to do?

49:11 Stop using them. Well, good luck getting food.

49:13 Once you've allowed, once we meet soon,

49:16 you have allowed the system to take a route

49:19 and to be used to regulate access to essential materials

49:23 like fuel, money, food, to end the human freedom.

49:28 Using database, common format has never happened to humanity.

49:33 That's what is being formed at tremendous speed right now.

49:37 We can still take our freedoms back right now,

49:40 but if we just sort of shuffle and look at our shoes

49:43 for a few more weeks, we'll be in a good way,

49:45 and we're not going to know.

49:47 So, that's what I think they're going to do.

49:50 So, that's why I think the government's going on with it,

49:52 provisions are going to put me on the stand.

49:54 I suspect money and threats and brides have been used.

49:59 I will say it's quite clear that planning to cope with

50:05 genuine pandemic emergencies has been a preoccupation

50:10 of the American administration

50:12 and increasingly other countries and organizations,

50:15 including WHO and the EU, over 30 years.

50:19 There's a good film on YouTube by Paul Schrayer,

50:22 one of the German journalists,

50:24 and it's called Pandemic Stimulations,

50:26 Preparation from New Age, question mark,

50:29 and it takes you through the last 30 years of table top

50:32 pandemic preparation exercises,

50:34 the last of which was event two of one in October 2019,

50:39 which simulates a coronavirus emerging in China

50:43 and spreading around the world.

50:45 And their greatest preoccupation as they went through

50:48 the pandemic plan was how much of tourism they should use

50:51 and how quickly to get that season into people.

50:54 And I'd say that was probably the 10th or 15th

50:56 of a long line of pandemic preparedness plans.

51:00 So I'm sorry they have had an opportunity to rehearse,

51:03 but the things I've noted about event two of one,

51:06 every single player involved around the table

51:10 are currently around their tables

51:13 doing exactly the role they did in simulation in October 2019.

51:18 For example, our world in data or whatever it's called,

51:21 where we can all go and find the data.

51:23 The database is supplied by Johns Hopkins University,

51:26 and that was the role they held in October 2019 for event two of one.

51:31 You know, seriously, all this laughing in our faces,

51:34 that planning exercise,

51:36 I think was the last rehearsal for what actually happened.

51:39 So everyone just...

51:41 And we are where we are.

51:43 So just quickly, the last few questions.

51:45 Our vaccine is hard to prevent, really.

51:48 I'm not certain, but remember thalidomide

51:51 and the less than thalidomide.

51:53 If you don't know, we never, since 1960,

51:56 give novel untested medicines to pregnant women.

52:00 We never do.

52:02 You know, people wouldn't even have, you know,

52:05 I don't know, a drink or one tablet if they're pregnant.

52:09 It's very common enough for people to be extremely careful

52:11 because they're aware that developing babies

52:13 are going to be incredibly sensitive

52:15 and not protected inside Johns Hopkins.

52:17 But incredibly sensitive as they go to all these developing stages

52:21 to any interference.

52:23 It's mad and reckless to vaccinating women.

52:27 And I actually think...

52:30 So not only is it that like it just in principle,

52:33 probably in practice,

52:35 but the effects we warned in our petition,

52:39 Dr. Bogel and I,

52:40 we said one, the vaccine might make you ill just generally.

52:43 And that's clearly not good for the developing baby.

52:46 But two things, one we knew, one we did.

52:49 The one we knew is that the spike protein

52:52 has a weak real and worrying similarity

52:55 to a hormone ascension pregnancy.

52:57 And it was mentioned earlier today since it was one.

53:00 But the similarity is not great.

53:03 But it's just enough for someone like me

53:05 and Dr. Bogel to notice it.

53:07 And we thought, well, if you bring about immunity

53:10 to the spike protein,

53:11 it's possible some immune reactions could now occur

53:14 to related proteins.

53:16 So let's just check that that doesn't occur.

53:18 Of course, as soon as we mentioned it,

53:20 we were all conspiracy theorists.

53:22 But that's what's happened.

53:23 There's been a recent publication,

53:25 15 women vaccinated,

53:27 and all 15 of them showed a prompt and marked,

53:30 suddenly maybe almost two and a half fold increase

53:33 in antibodies against their own percentage in 16.1.

53:37 We don't know what the consequences are,

53:39 but I think people should stop saying

53:41 as you can start listening to people who are sincere

53:44 and offer us concerned advice.

53:46 And the other thing we learned late after the petition

53:50 is at least the mRNA vaccines,

53:53 that's modernizer,

53:55 they're made by old school

54:00 and someone gave a testimony earlier today,

54:03 said a Japanese study that had been done for Pfizer

54:08 on their behalf had been made available

54:12 for free information.

54:15 And it shows that at least the vaccine codes,

54:18 the non-fast gods,

54:20 accumulates in rodent ovaries.

54:22 And there's a paper, a peer review to be announced

54:25 at nine years old, 2012,

54:28 in which multiple species have been tested with multiple

54:31 of these lipid nanoparticle vehicles.

54:34 And the paper has even caused lipid nanocarriers

54:41 in the literature.

54:43 And yet they use these kind of things as the design

54:46 for the vaccine to went ahead.

54:48 So--

54:50 - Could you repeat that, sorry, Dr. Eden,

54:52 could you just repeat the name of the article,

54:54 you got a little bit interference?

54:56 - Yes, I can certainly send a copy to you,

54:59 but it's something like,

55:01 I think it's like lipid nanoparticle formulations

55:06 and unrealized ovarian or fertility risk.

55:10 I will send you,

55:11 I will send the paper to David Newman,

55:13 perhaps if he would like,

55:15 I can certainly send that.

55:16 So that's in the lecture nine years ago.

55:19 And yet in 2019 or 2020,

55:23 these two companies chose to use that formulation

55:25 and they didn't bother to do any testing

55:27 or tell us about it.

55:29 So we had to find it out by FOI and Japan.

55:32 So I'm afraid that's one of my,

55:34 when I realized this, I completely,

55:37 I realized that, you know,

55:39 in the sense my life's been a lie,

55:41 I've been an honest sincere soldier,

55:43 a full soldier trying to discover new medicines,

55:45 but it seems to me that some colleagues are willing

55:48 to do things that, you know,

55:51 you really shouldn't do, crimes against humanity.

55:54 But that design is going to lead to accumulation in liveries.

55:58 We've seen it repeatedly.

56:00 Well, that's what's going to happen again.

56:02 It wasn't tested.

56:03 No one told us.

56:04 Anyway, can this possibly be benign?

56:07 No, it isn't.

56:08 Nothing I told you is benign.

56:10 So you can disagree or say it's crazy

56:12 about when this is going.

56:14 But it's pretty obvious to me that it's malign

56:18 and deliberate right from the beginning,

56:20 right from prior to mass transparency

56:22 and still to today,

56:24 the authoritarianism is frightening.

56:26 I can't remember.

56:28 So, five, I don't think I have anything useful to add about

56:33 our toxic substances.

56:35 I can do so much and I just chose,

56:37 I've chosen not to drop nothing into things

56:41 like grumpy and oxide.

56:42 I don't know.

56:43 So I'm not saying it's not nothing,

56:45 nothing useful to add.

56:47 Are all vaccines,

56:49 are all of the COVID-19 vaccines similarly toxic?

56:51 I would say qualitatively, yes.

56:54 One might be slightly worse than another,

56:56 but they all bring about expression in the body

56:59 of spike proteins, which are phrombogenic.

57:03 And they will all do it rather variably,

57:05 depending on how the vaccine distributes

57:07 after it's been injected into your shoulder,

57:10 into your arm.

57:11 So, and there have been reports of blood toxin deaths

57:14 shortly after vaccination with all of them.

57:16 I would be terrified if I was required

57:19 to be vaccinated knowing what I'm not.

57:21 I've chosen not to.

57:22 I'm not vulnerable.

57:23 I'm happy to take the chances.

57:25 I'm definitely, I'm very worried about safety.

57:28 And then lastly, about the issue of

57:32 natural immunity versus vaccine immunity.

57:34 It's really important.

57:37 I would say that natural immunity,

57:39 our immune system is really good

57:42 at doing what I would describe as dismantling,

57:45 testing and memorizing.

57:47 Everything compares to the pathogen.

57:50 So, you know, there are specialized cells in our body

57:52 that would be unsurprised to hear,

57:54 and their job is to recognize a non-self,

57:57 living human, non-self.

57:59 Proteins arriving, they grab it, cut it into pieces,

58:02 and then they compare it with all of the repertoire

58:05 of our immune system and pick out a few dozen,

58:08 which are very different from seven,

58:11 very characteristic of the pathogen,

58:13 and then we basically do what's called

58:15 clinical expansion, we then grow up,

58:17 cells capable of recognizing that little piece again.

58:21 And that collection of sort of anti-foreign substance,

58:25 anti-pathogen immune recognition,

58:28 that's called our immune repertoire.

58:31 If you are infected and spied,

58:33 which almost everybody does,

58:35 then you will have complete durable

58:38 and adaptable immunity to this

58:41 and related viruses, probably for life.

58:44 But certainly for many years, based on the 2003 SARS,

58:48 people who infected the spike are still immune

58:52 to SARS-1 and SARS-2 17 years later.

58:56 So they have cross-immunity,

58:58 as I said, to related viruses.

59:00 So that's great, natural immunity.

59:02 You examine every part of it,

59:04 the outside, the inside, the meat,

59:06 the appearance of the capsule, the spike, and so on.

59:08 And our body chooses which of the bits

59:11 that are most characteristic of the pathogen

59:14 that are most different from us.

59:16 So we fire the weapons at the end,

59:18 not for ends we fire.

59:20 And that leads you immune to variants as well.

59:24 We don't want to vaccinate people

59:26 who could survive the virus because

59:29 when they survive the virus and not get real,

59:32 they end up with this complete

59:34 durable and adaptable immunity,

59:36 which means they'll cope with what are covariates

59:39 and gotten the nature throws up.

59:41 But if you use the vaccine,

59:44 because they've been designed only

59:46 to make your body manufacture one part of the virus,

59:49 the spike, that's the immunity

59:52 that you acquire after vaccination.

59:55 And worse than that, there are several risks

59:58 from doing vaccines like this,

1:00:01 where you just use portion of it.

1:00:03 What is called original antigenic sieve,

1:00:06 and I think that it's being locked onto one target.

1:00:09 If we give an intense burst of just one protein

1:00:12 to the immune system,

1:00:14 it thinks this is so involved, in a sense,

1:00:17 that it will learn assiduously

1:00:19 to recognize just this spike protein.

1:00:22 If you present it with something

1:00:24 that's a little bit different,

1:00:25 it doesn't really understand.

1:00:27 It's like when you want to be focused on this one.

1:00:29 So it makes antibodies and T cells

1:00:31 to the original one, so 2020, COVID variant.

1:00:35 And I think this original antigenic sieve means

1:00:39 that's all your immune system can do.

1:00:41 And so you could get ill to a variant,

1:00:43 at least that's the theory.

1:00:44 We're not sure, but that's a serious worry.

1:00:47 And it has happened before with, say,

1:00:50 daily fever vaccines.

1:00:52 It has to be withdrawn from the market,

1:00:53 because it turned out people who've been vaccinated

1:00:56 actually got sicker than unvaccinated people.

1:00:59 So it protected many people,

1:01:01 but many people actually got worse disease.

1:01:04 And so, you know, as you heard me say,

1:01:08 I don't think I'm sure that vaccines are not necessary.

1:01:11 They don't work very well and they're not safe.

1:01:13 We've suppressed effective memory treatments,

1:01:16 we've lied to the populations to scare the hell out of them,

1:01:19 and crushed the economy and civil society.

1:01:22 And we're now moving very close to the end

1:01:25 of the free humanity with the introduction of mandatory,

1:01:28 near mandatory vaccinations or coercive vaccinations.

1:01:31 It's really hard to go about it.

1:01:33 And accompanying that by digital vaccine proof,

1:01:38 it's a digital ID.

1:01:40 On the back of that can be introduced to everything digital,

1:01:43 including surveillance and money.

1:01:45 Anyway, so I think you've got a choice really.

1:01:49 If you believe anything you've been told,

1:01:51 you can either eventually work out together

1:01:54 how you're going to tell Jewish people

1:01:56 and how you're going to tell the world,

1:01:58 gliding over the last functioning institution on the planet,

1:02:01 if you want to it.

1:02:03 If you look at the floor,

1:02:05 then we'll all go over a barrel within the free humanity.

1:02:09 So I urge you, as your previous witnesses did,

1:02:15 to take this more seriously than anything you ever had in the past.

1:02:19 I have.

1:02:20 That's what my life has been dedicated to this

1:02:23 and has told us that we can't prevent it.

1:02:25 So I'll stop at that point.

1:02:27 And I'm happy to take any questions.

1:02:29 Thank you so much for coming in from the UK to testify.

1:02:37 Dr. Yeadon, your information is shared with the court

1:02:41 and we are very grateful for your passion,

1:02:44 for your years of dedication,

1:02:46 and for you trying to make sure that we hear loud and clear

1:02:49 what you're trying to communicate to us

1:02:51 and how dire we are in a situation

1:02:54 and that this court can make a decision

1:02:57 to maybe change or reverse history.

1:03:00 So I thank you.

1:03:02 Questions?

1:03:05 Yes.

1:03:07 Question.

1:03:09 Okay.

1:03:10 Okay, so Dr. Yeadon, thank you again.

1:03:12 And would you please forward any articles to our contact people

1:03:16 so we could share that with the communities that our rabbis serve.

1:03:20 And again, thank you for your service to humanity

1:03:23 and for your time today.

1:03:25 And if you want to get it, I'm going to be able to choose to speak.

1:03:28 All right, thank you.

1:03:32 So we have Dr. -- oh, sorry.

1:03:35 He should give you the names of the --

1:03:38 what he claims could harm the reproductive system.

1:03:41 Yes, all those articles, yes.

1:03:42 I'm going to ask him for all of them.

1:03:43 We'll make sure that we get it precisely from his --

1:03:46 Specify the ingredients.

1:03:48 Right, so every little thing that he can put down,

1:03:50 we're going to ask you if he's not back there.

1:03:52 Okay, so we're going to make sure he gets all the information

1:03:54 for you guys to have for your community.

1:03:57 Right.

1:03:58 So you don't want just the article.

1:04:00 You want to know where to look in the article so that we don't --

1:04:02 because we don't have to read, let's say, medical journals, per se.

1:04:05 And this way, specifically, you can say,

1:04:07 "Here's what the spike protein does to the ovaries.

1:04:10 Here's what this was done."

1:04:11 Yes, okay, so we're going to ask him for both a narrative,

1:04:14 which is an explanation, as well as the article.

1:04:18 Okay.

0:00 Okay.

0:01 Dr. Janci Lindsay, thank you for coming,

0:07 and she's a PhD, and we thank you for agreeing to testify today.

0:12 Dr. Lindsay is a toxicologist and a molecular biologist

0:16 with over 30 years of experience.

0:19 She's worked on a human vaccine herself

0:21 that unintentionally caused autoimmune ovarian destruction,

0:25 so she's aware of the dangers of sidestepping animal studies.

0:30 Dr. Lindsay has extensive studied both the COVID virus

0:34 and the genetic biological vaccines.

0:37 Today, she will talk to us about the effects of the COVID shot

0:41 on our bodies and its effect on reproduction.

0:45 Dr. Lindsay, can you hear us?

0:48 Yes, I can. Can you hear me?

0:50 Yes, we can.

0:51 Thank you so much for being here and for testifying.

0:54 Absolutely.

0:56 Thank you for having me. I appreciate it.

0:59 I hope that what I impart to you today will be helpful

1:02 to not only your community, but to all of us,

1:05 because I truly believe that you have the unique opportunity

1:09 to perhaps save all of us by the decisions that you make.

1:13 I echo the sentiments of so many others

1:17 that our regulatory and safety agencies have been captured.

1:21 They no longer are performing the role that they were assigned to do,

1:25 which is to protect our health and safety,

1:27 especially those of our sensitive sub-populations,

1:30 which include our precious children, the unborn, and our elderly.

1:35 Ironically, the very shots that were designed to protect our elderly,

1:41 who were the most at risk from this infection,

1:44 are the shots that are killing them in numbers we've never seen.

1:48 There's an alarming correlation between the shots globally

1:52 and the increases in not only COVID cases, but COVID deaths.

1:56 I'm sure you've seen this in a number of simulations

1:59 and videos and papers.

2:01 Despite this, we are told to not believe our eyes,

2:05 told to not believe the data,

2:07 but to believe the propaganda that is paid for by the pharmaceutical companies,

2:11 the pharmacia companies that are orchestrating this.

2:16 I also echo the sentiments of Dr. Yeaton

2:20 in believing that this is an orchestrated event.

2:24 There is just too much pointing to that

2:28 for me not to believe that as a scientist and so many logically thinks.

2:34 Most of us feel that way, if not all of us.

2:37 There was a discussion early on as to whether to talk about this publicly

2:41 for fear of sounding like we were engaging in some kind of conspiracy.

2:48 I think it's important to realize when you get to the point

2:52 when the logic does not allow for any other explanation,

2:57 but the thing which is considered a conspiracy

3:00 and I believe that we are well past that now.

3:03 I'm most concerned for our children, for our conscious children.

3:08 I have two children of my own.

3:10 My husband and I have a 10-year-old and a 14-year-old girl.

3:14 We're older parents.

3:16 We like everybody else who wants to protect the future for our children.

3:21 I looked into Dr. Yeaton, Dr. Woodard's petition

3:24 to the European Medicines Agency back in December of 220.

3:28 I also came up with the same conclusions

3:32 with respect to the syncytin proteins.

3:35 I also submitted something to the rabbinical courts

3:38 on an analysis of the syncytin proteins similarities

3:42 and their functions enroll in reproduction.

3:46 In fact, I believe it was July 27th of 2021 this year.

3:52 So I will send that again, updated version.

3:56 I also would have recently sent to the CDC

3:59 that also shows the similarities between the syncytin proteins,

4:04 which are endogenous proteins.

4:06 That means proteins that we produce ourselves

4:10 that are very similar to the spike protein

4:14 to which all the vaccines are made.

4:19 So the vaccines, all of them,

4:22 as you've heard from other witnesses,

4:25 instruct our body to make this spike protein,

4:29 this fusogenic spike protein,

4:31 and then to express it on our cells.

4:34 Once it's expressed on our cells,

4:36 we are then to create antibodies

4:38 against the very spike protein that's expressed on our cells.

4:42 I believe this to be an extremely dangerous technology.

4:46 In fact, we've shown that it's an extremely dangerous technology

4:50 with the increased numbers of deaths that we've seen.

4:54 I know a lot of people have covered the deaths,

4:58 so I want to try to stick to some numbers

5:01 that other people have not covered.

5:03 I know that you had asked Dr. Christiane Northrup earlier

5:07 what the numbers were for menstrual disorders

5:12 for miscarriage, for vaginal hemorrhage.

5:17 So I wanted to relate those numbers to you,

5:20 and I can also provide the link for that.

5:22 So the numbers of miscarriage from the last update

5:26 are 2,508 miscarriages assigned to the Bayer system.

5:32 Of course, we know from a Harvard study

5:34 that the Bayer system contains only between,

5:38 well, the Harvard study said less than 1% of all adverse events.

5:43 Some people have said that now it may contain up to 10% at most.

5:50 I still believe that it's less than 1%,

5:53 because as others might relate to you,

5:56 there are 11 other databases that are being reported into

6:00 by the pharmaceutical companies,

6:02 people in the clinical trials.

6:04 And we don't know whether or not those are being filed back

6:08 into the Bayer's reporting system as they're supposed to be.

6:11 The CDC has not been transparent in its classification

6:18 of who is vaccinated and who is not vaccinated.

6:21 As some others may have relayed to you,

6:24 you were not considered fully vaccinated in the United States

6:27 until you were 14 days from the second shot

6:31 for the mRNA vaccines.

6:33 And 14 days from the first shot,

6:36 the only shot for the J&J formulation,

6:39 that of course is grossly inaccurate.

6:42 Other countries, the UK and Israel, thank goodness,

6:45 are tracking things a little bit better.

6:48 Can you be okay?

6:49 Yes, yes, yes.

6:51 I just want to make sure, okay.

6:54 So we know that there have been an alarming number of miscarriages

7:02 in the population.

7:05 And if it's less than 1% that's being reported at 2,508,

7:13 then of course the numbers would be much, much greater.

7:17 We know from the two New England Journal of Medicine studies

7:22 that there is a greatly increased risk of miscarriage

7:26 among women that are vaccinated in the first trimester.

7:30 And I want to tell you that there are a lot of debunkers out there

7:34 that are paid by the pharmaceutical industry

7:36 and I was taken aside here to say that I have also worked

7:39 for the pharmaceutical industry.

7:42 I know how this works.

7:43 I am a paid consultant.

7:45 I am a toxicologist.

7:47 I am not being paid to do any of what I'm doing here.

7:50 In fact, I have lost clients over speaking out about this.

7:54 There's no financial incentive for any of us on this panel

7:58 to relay what we're relating to you.

8:00 We are only trying to save lives.

8:04 But I wanted to let you know that the other--

8:10 I'm sorry, I lost my place there for a moment.

8:14 But there's other symptoms that have been coming up

8:17 in the registry that have to do with reproduction

8:22 and that is testicular pain and swelling.

8:25 There were a thousand cases reported of that

8:28 and also performance impairment with respect to men.

8:35 There were 279 cases reported of that.

8:39 I've also been contacted by a gal who works in a fertility clinic

8:45 early on after my testimony to the CDC

8:48 where I said I was extremely worried

8:50 that we would see perhaps fertility and even stability

8:55 of an entire generation or more than a generation

8:59 through the use of these vaccines due to cross-reaction

9:02 to the sincitin proteins.

9:06 She let me know that they were early on seeing embryo arrest

9:10 at the precise day that we would expect

9:14 the sincitin expression to take place

9:18 and that's around day five and the embryo

9:20 is also important in embryogenesis.

9:23 So they were seeing previously--

9:27 couples that they had used previously for donor egg

9:30 and donor sperm when the egg was fertilized

9:35 and the embryo started to grow

9:37 that the embryo would spontaneously die at day five.

9:41 They're also seeing that they're having trouble

9:45 with miscarriage among the vaccinated women

9:48 that come in for IVF treatment.

9:51 Other people have reached out to me,

9:53 nurses have reached out to me talking about

9:55 the alarming rate of stillbirths.

9:59 As far as the reproductive and menstrual disorders,

10:04 we have many reported, of course,

10:08 Dr. Northrup talked about the thousands and thousands

10:11 of cases that were reported on the internet,

10:14 but I personally, being one of the American frontline doctor

10:19 associated scientists,

10:21 have spoken with our Spanish outreach woman helper

10:27 and her daughter, since she was old,

10:31 had to undergo some physical therapy for a couple weeks

10:36 and the physical therapist that gave her the treatment

10:40 had just gotten a shot.

10:43 Well, following a week of physical therapy daily

10:46 with this physical therapist in their home,

10:49 her six-year-old daughter started menstruating.

10:53 They can't reverse it.

10:55 They've been to several doctors.

10:57 They just have to accept this.

11:02 There are countless reports, I've gotten calls and emails

11:06 from many women, women miscarried from being the presence

11:11 of a mother-in-law or their husband

11:15 who recently got the shot.

11:18 They miscarriage their child at a time

11:20 when they wouldn't normally be at great risk to miscarry.